A dialogic inquiry approach to working with teachers in developing classroom dialogue

Teachers College Record

Volumn 113, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1906-1959

  Hennessy, Sara ^a   Mercer, Neil ^a   Warwick, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952962481     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alexander, R. J. (1984). Innovation and continuity in the initial teacher education curriculum. In R. J. Alexander, M. Craft, & J. Lynch (Eds.), Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins (pp. 103-160). London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Alexander, R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge, England: Dialogos UK Ltd.
3. Armstrong, V., & Curran, S. (2006). Developing a collaborative mode of research using digital video. Computers and Education, 46, 336-347.
4. Bakhtin, M. N. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bakhtin, M. N. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school-university research partnerships: An analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 411-427.
7. Bjuland, R., & Jaworski, B. (2009). Teachers' perspectives on collaboration with didacticians to create an inquiry community. Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 21-38.
8. Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
9. Brown, S. (2005). How can research inform ideas of good practice in teaching? The contributions of some official initiatives in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 383-406.
10. Butler, D. L., Laushcer, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers' professional development Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435-455.
11. Cardellichio, T, & Field, W. (1997). Seven strategies that encourage neural branching. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 33-36.
12. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. (Pubitemid 36209336)
13. Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers' and students' perspectives. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
14. Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking Together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham, England: Imaginative Minds.
15. de Freitas, S., Oliver, M., Mee, A., & Mayes, T. (2008). The practitioner perspective on the modeling of pedagogy and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24(1), 26-38.
16. Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2006). Teachers' developing "practical theories" of the contribution of information and communication technologies to subject teaching and learning: An analysis of cases from English secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 459-480. (Pubitemid 43704188)
17. di Sessa, A. (1991). Local sciences: Viewing the design of human-computer systems as cognitive science. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 162-202). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Edwards, J.-A., & Jones, K. (2003). Co-learning in the collaborative mathematics classroom. In A. Peter-Koop, A. Begg, C. Breen, & V. Santos-Wagner (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 135-151). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. Elden, M. (1981). Sharing the research work: Participative research and its role demands. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research (pp. 253-266). Chichester, England: Wiley.
20. Elliott, J. (2004). Using research to improve practice: The notion of evidence-based practice. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 264-290). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
21. Feito, J. A. (2007). Allowing not-knowing in a dialogic discussion. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern. edu/ijsotl/vlnl/feito/ij-feito.htm
22. Fisler, J. L., & Firestone, W. A. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108, 1155-1185. (Pubitemid 43824314)
23. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Litdeton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A "learning revolution"? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary schools. Learning Media and Technology, 32, 243-256.
24. Goodchild, S. (2007). Inside the outside: Seeking evidence of didacticians' learning by expansion. In B. Jaworski, A. B. Fuglestad, R. Bjuland, T. Breiteig, S. Goodchild, & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Learning communities in mathematics (pp. 189-203). Straume, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
25. Groundwater-Smith, S., & Dadds, M. (2004). Critical practitioner inquiry: Towards responsible professional communities of practice. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 238-263). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
26. Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 122-144.
27. Hennessy, S. (2011). The role of digital artefacts on the interactive whiteboard in mediating dialogic teaching and learning. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00416.x.
28. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009a). The impact of collaborative video analysis by practitioners and researchers upon pedagogical thinking and practice: A follow-up study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 617-638.
29. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009b). "Intermediate theory" building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111, 1753-1795.
30. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Dawes, M., & Bowker, A. (2008). Supporting professional development for ICT use in the secondary classroom using a multimedia resource: Final Report to NCETM. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, England.
31. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning Media and Technology, 52(3), 283-301.
32. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31, 3-15. Retrieved September 2009 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3594422.
33. Howe, C, Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Livingston, K., et al. (2007). Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 549-563.
34. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211. (Pubitemid 44480212)
35. Jaworski, B. (2007). Introducing LCM-Learning Communities in Mathematics. In B. Jaworski, A. B. Fuglestad, R. Bjuland, T. Breiteig, S. Goodchild, & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Learning communities in mathematics (pp. 13-25). Straume, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
36. Jones, S., Tanner, H., Kennewell, S., Parkinson, J., Denny, H., Anthony, C, et al. (2009). Using video stimulated reflective dialogue to support the development of ICT based pedagogy in mathematics and science. Welsh Journal of Education, 14(2), 63-77.
37. Leat, D. (2009). Thinking differently about research outputs [Electronic version]. Research Intelligence: News from the British Educational Research Association. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://www.bera.ac.uk/files/2009/ 01/ril05-final.pdf
38. Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665-708). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
39. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeid, P. C, Krajik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1998). New technologies for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 33-52.
40. McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 357-382. (Pubitemid 43024113)
41. McLaughlin, C, Black-Hawkins, K., Brindley, S., McIntyre, D., & Taber, K. (2006). Researching schools: Stories from a school-university partnership for educational research. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
42. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York: Routledge.
43. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137-168.
44. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
45. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. London: Routledge.
46. Mercer, N., & Scott, P. (2007). Dialogic teaching in science classrooms: Final Report to ESRC (No. RES-000-23-0939).
47. Miller, D., & Glover, D. (2007). Into the unknown: The professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning Media and Technology, 32, 319-332.
48. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
49. Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: a critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 273-306.
50. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16-25.
51. Powell, A., Francisco, J., & Maher, C. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435. (Pubitemid 37449809)
52. Putnam, R. X, & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
53. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2007). Theory into practice: A matter of transfer. Theory Into Practice, 46, 334-342.
54. Rathgen, E. (2006). In the voice of teachers: The promise and challenge of participating in classroom-based research for teachers' professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(5), 580-591. (Pubitemid 43578276)
55. Rudd, T. (2007). Interactive whiteboards in the classroom. Bristol, England: Futurelab.
56. Ruthven, K. (2001). Mathematics teaching, teacher education, and educational research: Developing "practical theorising" in initial teacher education. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 165-183). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
57. Ruthven, K. (2002). Linking researching with teaching: Towards synergy of scholarly and craft knowledge. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 581-598). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in teaching and learning secondary English, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 259-275. (Pubitemid 38461953)
59. Ruthven, K., Laborde, C, Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329-342.
60. Simons, H., Kushner, S., Jones, K, & James, D. (2003). From evidence-based practice to practice-based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education, 18, 347-364.
61. Sorensen, P. D., Newton, L. R., & Harrison, C. (2006, September). The professional development of teachers through interaction with digital video. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), University of Warwick.
62. Stenhouse, L. A. (1975). The teacher as researcher. In L. A. Stenhouse (Ed.), An introduction to curriculum research and development (pp. 142-165). London: Heinemann.
63. Sutherland, R., Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Brawn, R., Breeze, N., Gall, M., et al. (2004). Transforming teaching and learning: Embedding ICT into everyday classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 413-425. (Pubitemid 40004756)
64. Saljo, R. (1995). Mental and physical artifacts in cognitive practices. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 83-96). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
65. Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: Information and communication technology, professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 426-439. (Pubitemid 40004757)
66. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner co-operation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
67. Warwick, P., Hennessy, S., & Mercer, N. (2011). Promoting teaching and school development through co-enquiry: Developing interactive whiteboard use in a "dialogic classroom." Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 303-324.
68. Warwick, P., & Kershner, R. (2008). Primary teachers' understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children's collaborative learning and knowledge-building. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 269-287.
69. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
70. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
71. Wiske, M. S. (1995). A cultural perspective on school-university collaboration. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 187-212). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.