Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs

Teachers College Record

Volumn 108, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1155-1185

  Fisler, Jennifer L ^a   Firestone, William A ^b,c  

^a MESSIAH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744722025     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00689.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and, sustaining innovations (Prepared under contract no. HEW-OS-73-216 with the U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
2. Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1997). How the emergence of teacher leadership helped build a professional development school. In M. Levine & R. Trachtman (Eds.), Making professional development schools work (pp. 52-75). New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practice (pp. 35-66). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (1996). Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement. Chicago: University of Chicago, Center for School Improvement.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Chester, M. D., & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233-257.
7. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (Eds.). (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Esselman, M. E., & Moore, W. P. (1992, April). In search of organizational variables which can be altered to promote an increased sense of teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
10. Firestone, W. A., & Fisler, J. L. (2002). Politics, community, and leadership in a school-university partnership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 449-493.
11. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13.
12. Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 41-17.
13. Guskey, T.R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69.
14. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School. Journal, 93, 355-372.
15. Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in social context. London: Croom Helm.
16. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1990). Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92, 105-122.
17. Loucks, S. F., & Hall, G. E. (1979). Implementing innovations in schools: A concerns-based approach. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
18. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
20. Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1-30.
21. Smylie, M. A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 92-113). New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & Seashore K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 171-187.
24. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-249.
25. Whitford, B. L. (1994). Permission, persistence, and resistance: Linking high school restructuring with teacher education reform. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession (pp. 74-97). New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA.