Promoting teacher and school development through co-enquiry: Developing interactive whiteboard use in a 'dialogic classroom'

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 303-324

  Warwick, Paul ^a   Hennessy, Sara ^a   Mercer, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

co inquiry; dialogic approach; dialogue; interactive whiteboard; pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952905789     PISSN: 13540602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2011.554704     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York: Dialogos.
2. Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school-university research partnerships: an analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching, 13(4), 411.
3. Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the 'wow' factor: Developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
4. BESA. (2009). ICT in UK State Schools 2009: Summary report. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://www.besa.org.uk/besa/documents/view.jsp?item=1326
5. Daniels, H. (Ed.). (2005). An introduction to Vygotsky (2nd ed.). East Sussex: Routledge.
6. Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking Together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds.
7. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
8. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Karen Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2006, April 9). A learning revolution? Investigating the pedagogic practice around Interactive Whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
9. Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Optimising the use of interactive whiteboards: And application of developmental work research (DWR) in the UK. Professional Development in Education 35(3), 469-484.
10. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.
11. Hennessy, S., Warwick, P., & Mercer, N. (2011, in press). A dialogic inquiry approach to working with teachers in developing classroom dialogue. Teachers College Record, 113(9).
12. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Topping, K., Christie, D., Livingston, K., Jessiman, E., & Donaldson, C. (2007). Group work in elementary science: Towards organisational principles for supporting pupil learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 549-563.
13. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy, learning: A multimodality approach. London: Routledge.
14. Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teacher design of texts for interactive white boards in the secondary school classroom. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 303-317.
15. Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
16. Laurillard, D. (2004). Re-thinking the teaching of Science. In R. Holliman & E. Scanlon (Eds.), Mediating science learning through information and communications technology (pp. 27-50). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
17. Lewin, C., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B., & Haldane, M. (2009). The impact of formal and informal professional development opportunities on primary teachers' adoption of interactive whiteboards. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 173-185.
18. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, PA: Multilingual Matters.
19. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York: Routledge.
20. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168.
21. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 367-385.
22. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
23. Mercer, N., Kershner, R., Warwick, P., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). Can the Interactive Whiteboard help to provide 'dialogic space' for children's collaborative activity? Language and Education, 24(5), 367-384.
24. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
25. Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507-528.
26. Mohon, E.H. (2008). SMART moves? A case study of one teacher's pedagogical change through the use of the interactive whiteboard. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 301-312.
27. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.
28. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levačić, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The Interactive Whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) project: London challenge (DfES Research Report RR816). London: DfES.
29. Postholm, M.B. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of using ICT - As a mediating artefact in classrooms compared to alternative tools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(6), 587-599.
30. Rathgen, E. (2006). In the voice of teachers: The promise and challenge of participating in classroom-based research for teachers' professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(5), 580-591.
31. Rawlins, D. (2009). From theory into practice: Creating the conditions which will support the development of dialogic teaching through the use of the Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) in an urban primary school. Unpublished CfPS submission: Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge
32. Rojas-Drummond, S., Littleton, K., Hernández, F., & Zúniga, M. (2010). Dialogical interactions among peers in collaborative writing contexts. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 128-148). Abingdon: Routledge.
33. Rudd, T. (2007). Interactive whiteboards in the classroom. Bristol: Futurelab Report - IWBs.
34. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). Impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
35. Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
36. Stenhouse, L.A. (1975). The teacher as researcher. In L.A. Stenhouse (Ed.), An introduction to curriculum research and development (pp. 142-165). London: Heinemann.
37. Sutherland, R., Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Brawn, R., Gall, M., Matthewman, S., ... John, P. (2004). Transforming teaching and learning: Embedding ICT into every-day classroom practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 413-425.
38. Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: Information and communication technology, professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 426-439.
39. Warwick, P., & Kershner, R. (2008). Primary teachers' understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children's collaborative learning and knowledge-building. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 269-287.
40. Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55, 350-362.
41. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
42. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1998). Software design to support discussion in the primary curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 199-211.