Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 283-301

  Hennessy, Sara ^a   Deaney, Rosemary ^a   Ruthven, Kenneth ^a   Winterbottom, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547844055     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880701511131     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alsop, S., Bencze, L. & Pedretti, E. (Eds) (2004) Analysing exemplary science teaching (Buckingham, Open University Press).
2. Baggott La Velle, L., Mcfarlane, A., John, P. D. & Brawn, R. (2004) According to the promises: the sub-culture of school science, teachers' pedagogic identity and the challenge of ICT, Education, Communication & Information, 4(1), 109-129.
3. Bauersfeld, H. (1988) Interaction, construction, and knowledge: alternative perspectives for mathematics education, in: D. Grouws, T. Cooney & D. Jones (Eds) Perspectives on research on effective mathematics learning (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum), 27-46.
4. Beauchamp, G. & Parkinson, J. (2005) Beyond the 'wow' factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard, School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
5. Becta (2003) What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Available online at: http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/ wtrs_whiteboards.pdf (accessed 24 February 2007).
6. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. & Anderson, J. H. (1980) Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics, American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1074-1079.
7. Clarke, D. (2004) Kikan-Shido - between desks instruction, paper presented as part of symposium Lesson events as the basis for international comparisons of classroom practice. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, 12-16 April.
8. Denvir, H. & Askew, M. (2001) Pupils' participation in the classroom examined in relation to 'interactive whole class teaching', in: Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (Manchester, Manchester Metropolitan University).
9. Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (Eds) (1985) Children's ideas in science (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
10. Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987) Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom (London, Routledge).
11. Godwin, S. & Sutherland, R. (2004) Whole class technology for learning mathematics: the case of functions and graphs, Education, Communication & Information, 4(1), 131-152.
12. Gray, B. V. (1999) Science education in the developing world: issues and considerations, Journal of Research in Teaching, 36(3), 261-268.
13. Hargreaves, L., Moyles, J., Merry, R., Paterson, F., Pell, A. A. & Esarte-Sarries, V. (2003) How do primary school teachers define and implement 'interactive teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy in England?, Research Papers in Education, 18(3), 217-236.
14. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K. & Brindley, S. (2005) Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution and change, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
15. Heppell, S. (2004) Interactive whiteboards are useful stepping stones to other technologies (interviewed by George Cole), TES Online.
16. Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., et al. (2005) Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies. Final Report (Newcastle upon Tyne, Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University).
17. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2002) Science education from 14 to 19 (London, Stationery Office).
18. Jones, S. & Tanner, H. (2002) Teachers' interpretations of effective whole-class interactive teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms, Educational Studies, 28(3), 265-274.
19. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H. F., Jones, S., Parkinson, J., Norman, N. A. & Meiring, L. (2005) Characterising interactivity in the teaching of different subjects using ICT in secondary schools, paper presented in symposium on Interactive Teaching and Interactive Technologies, BERA 2005, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, 15-17 September.
20. Kerr, S. T. (1991) Lever and fulcrum: educational technology in teachers' thought and practice, Teachers College Record, 93(1), 114-136.
21. Levy, P. (2002) Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study (Sheffield, Department of Information Studies). Available online at: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/ wboards.htm (accessed 24 February 2007).
22. Mercer, N. (1995) The guided construction of knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners (Clevedon/Philadelphia, Multilingual Matters).
23. Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2004) Matching technology and pedagogy in teaching mathematics: understanding fractions using a 'virtual manipulative' fraction wall, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), Manchester, 16-18 September.
24. Mortimer, E. F. & Scott, P. H. (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
25. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levacic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A. & Castle, F. (2007) The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: an evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge (London, DfES).
26. Niederhauser, D. & Stoddart, T. (2001) Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-31.
27. NRC (Ed.) (1996) National Science Education Standards (Washington, DC, National Academy Press).
28. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. & Mcgillicuddy, K. (1996) Explaining science in the classroom (Buckingham, Open University Press).
29. Olson, J. (2000) Trojan horse or teacher's pet? Computers and the culture of the school, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 1-8.
30. Osborne, R. J. (1985) Building on children's intuitive ideas, in: R. J. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds) Learning in science: the implications of children's science (Auckland, Heinemann), 41-50.
31. Pollard, A. & Filer, A. (1996) The social world of children's learning: case studies of pupils from four to seven (London, Cassell).
32. Rogers, L. & Finlayson, H. (2004) Developing successful pedagogy with ICT-how are science teachers meeting the challenge?, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 287-305.
33. Rogoff, B. (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
34. Rogoff, B. (1995) Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, in: J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds) Sociocultural studies of mind (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 139-164.
35. Smith, F., Hardman, F. & Higgins, S. (2006) The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacherpupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies, British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
36. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005) Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
37. Stein, G. (2005) How does ICT support personalised and individualised learning? Available online at: http://client.canterbury.ac.uk/research/ papers/georgina-stein/ (accessed 24 February 2007).
38. Stenning, K., Mckendree, J., Lee, J., Cox, R., Dineen, F. & Mayes, T. (1999) Vicarious learning from educational dialogue, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Palo Alto, CA. Available online at: http://portal.acm.org/portal.cfm (accessed 24 February 2007).
39. Taber, K. S. (2003) Responding to alternative conceptions in the classroom, School Science Review, 84(308), 84-108.
40. Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2005) Interactive whole class teaching and interactive whiteboards, paper presented at the 28th Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA 28), Melbourne, 7-9 July.