Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 223-236

  Hale, J ^a   Alfonso, V ^b   Berninger, V ^b   Bracken, B ^b   Christo, C ^b   Clark, E ^b   Cohen, M ^b   Davis, A ^b   Decker, S ^b   Denckla, M ^b   Dumont, R ^b   Elliott, C ^b   Feifer, S ^b   Fiorello, C ^b   Flanagan, D ^b   Fletcher Janzen, E ^b   Geary, D ^b   Gerber, M ^b   Gerner, M ^b   Goldstein, S ^b   Gregg, N ^b   Hagin, R ^b   Jaffe, L ^b   Kaufman, A ^b   Kaufman, N ^b   Keith, T ^b   Kline, F ^b   Kochhar Bryant, C ^b   Lerner, J ^b   Marshall, G ^b   Mascolo, J ^b   Mather, N ^b   Mazzocco, M ^b   McCloskey, G ^b   McGrew, K ^b   Miller, D ^b   Miller, J ^b   Mostert, M ^b   Naglieri, J ^b   Ortiz, S ^b   Phelps, L ^b   Podhajski, B ^b   Reddy, L ^b   Reynolds, C ^b   Riccio, C ^b   Schrank, F ^b   Schultz, E ^b   Semrud Clikeman, M ^b   Shaywitz, S ^b   Simon, J ^b   Silver, L ^b   Swanson, L ^b   Urso, A ^b   Wasserman, T ^b   Willis, J ^b   Wodrich, D ^b   Wright, P ^b   Yalof, J ^b   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952459457     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: 2168376X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300310     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Aaron P. G.. The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research. 1997 ; 67: 461-502
2. Ardoin S. P., Witt J. C., Connell J. E., Koenig J. L.. Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identifi cation of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2005 ; 23: 362-380
3. Barnett D. W., Daly E. J., Jones K. M., Lentz F. E.. Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education. 2004 ; 38: 66-79
4. Barnett D. W., Elliott N., Graden J., Ihio T., MacMann G., Nantais M., Prasse D.. Technical adequacy for response to intervention practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2009 ; 32: 20-31
5. Barth A. E., Stuebing K. K., Anthony J. L., Denton C. A., Mathes P. G., Fletcher J. M., Francis D.J.. Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and Individiual Differences. 2008 ; 18: 296-307
6. Berkeley S., Bender W. N., Peaster L. G., Saunders L.. Implementation of response to intervention. A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2009 ; 42: 85-89
7. Berninger V. W.. Research-supported ideas for implementing reauthorized IDEA with intelligent professional psychological services. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 781-796
8. Berninger V. W., Abbott R. D. Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. Lyon R. G., ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes ; 1994: 163-183.
9. Berninger V. W., Holdnack J. A. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 68-81.
10. Berninger V. W., Abbott R. D., Brooksher R., Lemos Z., Ogier S., Zook D., et al. A connectionist approach to making the predictability of English orthography explicit to at-risk beginning readers: Evidence for alternative, effective strategies. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2000 ; 17: 241-271
11. Bocian K., Beebe M., MacMillan D., Gresham F. M.. Competing paradigms in learning disabilities classification by schools and the variations in the meaning of discrepant achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 1999 ; 14: 1-14
12. Brown-Chidsey R., Steege M. W. Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford ; 2005
13. Burns M. K., Senesac B. V.. Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention. Journal of School Psychology. 2005 ; 43: 393-406
14. Caterino L.C., Sullivan A. L., Long L., Bacal E.. A survey of Arizona school psychologists on the new IDEIA. The School Psychologist. 2005 ; 62 (2). 45-49
15. Chenault B., Thomson J., Abbott R. D., Berninger V. W.. Effects of prior training on child dyslexics' response to composition instruction. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2006 ; 29: 243-260
16. Daly E. J., Martens B. K., Barnett D., Witt J. C., Olson S. C.. Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review. 2007 ; 36: 562-581
17. Decker S. L.. School neuropsychology consultation in neurodevelopmental disorders. Psychology in the Schools. 2008 ; 45: 799-811
18. Decker S. L., Carboni J. A., Oliver J. A. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 192-199.
19. Deno S. L. Best Practices in School Psychology IV. Thomas A. Grimes J., ed. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists ; 2002: 37-56.
20. Dombrowski S. C., Kamphaus R. W., Reynolds C. R.. After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2004 ; 35: 364-372
21. Elliott C. D. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 210-218.
22. Feifer S. G., Toffalo D. A. Delia Integrating RTI with cognitive neuropsychology. A scientific approach to reading. Middletown, MD: School Neuropsych Press ; 2007
23. Feifer S. G.. Integrating response to intervention (RTI) with neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Psychology in the Schools. 2008 ; 45: 812-825
24. Ferrer E., Shaywitz B., Holahan J., Marchione K., Shaywitz S.. Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science. 2010 ; 21: 93-101
25. Fiorello C. A., Hale J. B., Snyder L. E.. Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading disabilities. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 835-854
26. Fiorello C. A., Hale J. B., Snyder L. E.. Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading disabilities. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 835-854
27. Fiorello C. A., Hale J. B., Decker S. L., Coleman S. Handbook of education, training and supervision of school psychologists in school and community. Garcia-Vazquez E. Crespi T. D. Riccio C. A., ed. New York: Taylor & Francis ; 2009: 213-232.
28. Fiorello C. A., Hale J. B., Snyder L. E., Forrest E., Teodori A. Applied cognitive research in K-3 classrooms. Thurman S. K. Fiorello C. A., ed. New York: Routledge ; 2008: 232-254.
29. Flanagan D. P., Ortiz S. O., Alfonso V. C. Essentials of cross battery assessment. 2007 ). Essentials of cross battery assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Flanagan D. P. Alfonso V. C., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc ; 2007
30. Flanagan D. P., Alfonso V. C., Mascolo J., Hale J. B. Handbook of pediatric neuropsychology. Davis A. S., ed. New York: Springer Publishing ;
31. Flanagan D. P., Ortiz S. O., Alfonso V. C., Dynda A. M.. Integration of response to intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 807-825
32. Fletcher J. M., Vaughn S.. Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives. 2007 ; 3: 30-37
33. Fletcher J. M., Denton C., Francis D.J.. Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 545-552
34. Fletcher J. M., Lyon G. R., Barnes M., Stuebing K. K., Francis D. J., Olson R. K., et al Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Bradley R. Danielson L. Hallahan D., ed. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum ; 2002: 185-250.
35. Fletcher-Janzen E. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 315-325.
36. Fletcher-Janzen E., Reynolds C. R. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008
37. Fuchs D., Deshler D. D.. What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2007 ; 22: 129-136
38. Fuchs D., Fuchs L. S.. Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?. Reading Research Quarterly. 2006 ; 41: 93-99
39. Fuchs D., Fuchs L. S., Compton D. L.. Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2004 ; 27: 216-227
40. Fuchs D., Fuchs L. S., Mathes P. G., Lipsey M. L., Roberts P. H. Identification of learning disabilities. Bradley R. Danielson L. Hallahan D., ed. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum ; 2002: 737-762.
41. Geary D. C., Hoard M. K. Handbook of mathematical cognition. Campbell J. I. D., ed. New York: Psychology Press ; 2005: 253-267.
42. Gerber M. M.. Teachers are still the test. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38 (6). 516-524
43. Gersten R., Dimino J. A.. New directions in research RTI (Response to Intervntion): Rethinking special education for students with reading disabilities. Reading Research Quarterly. 2006 ; 41: 43-58
44. Gresham F. M.. Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review. 2004 ; 33: 326-343
45. Grigorenko E. L.. Dynamic assessment and response-to-intervention. Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2009 ; 42: 111-132
46. Gunderson L., Siegal L.. The evils of the use of the IQ test to define learning disabilities in first and second language learners. The Reading Teacher. 2001 ; 55: 48-55
47. Gustafson S., Ferreira J., Ronnberg J.. Phonological or orthographic training for children with phonological or orthographic deficits. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice. 2007 ; 13: 211-228
48. Hain L. A., Hale J. B., Kendorski J. G. Emotional disorders: A neuropsychological, psychopharmacological, and educational perspective. Feifer S. G. Rattan G., ed. Middletown, MD: School Neuropsych Press ; 2009: 199-226.
49. Hain L. A., Hale J. B., Kendorski J. G. Emotional disorders: A neuropsychological, psychopharmacological, and educational perspective. Feifer S. G. Rattan G., ed. Middletown, MD: School Neuropsych Press ; 2009
50. Halberda J., Mazzocco M.M.M., Feigenson L.. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature. 2008 ; 455 (2). 665-668
51. Hale J. B., Kaufman A., Naglieri J. A., Kavale K. A.. Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 753-770
52. Hale J. B., Naglieri J. A., Kaufman A. S., Kavale K. A.. Specific learning disability classifi cation in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist. 2004 ; 58 (1). 6-4
53. Hale J. B.. Implementing IDEA with a three-tier model that includes response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. School Psychology Forum: Research and Practice. 2006 ; 1: 16-27
54. Hale J. B., Fiorello C. A., Brown L.. Determining medication treatment effects using teacher ratings and classroom observations of children with ADHD: Does neuropsychological impairment matter?. Educational and Child Psychology. 2005 ; 22: 39-61
55. Hale J. B., Fiorello C. A., Dumont R., Willis J. O., Rackley C., Elliott C.. Differential Ability Scales - Second Edition (neuro)psychological Predictors of Math Performance for Typical Children and Children with Math Disabilities. Psychology in the Schools. 2008 ; 45: 838-858
56. Hale J. B., Fiorello C. A., Miller J. A., Wenrich K., Teodori A. M., Henzel J. WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention. 2008 ). WISC-IV assessment and intervention strategies for children with specific learning disabilities. In PrifiteraA.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 109-171). New York: Elsevier. Prifitera A. Saklofske D. H. Weiss L. G., ed. New York: Elsevier ; 2008: 109-171.
57. Hale J. B., Flanagan D. P., Naglieri J. A.. Alternative research-based methods for IDEA (2004) identification of children with specific learning disabilities. Communique. 2008 ; 36 (8). 1 14-17
58. Hale J. B., Kaufman A., Naglieri J. A., Kavale K. A.. Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 753-770
59. Hale J. B., Wycoff K. L., Fiorello C. A. Essentials of specific learning disability assessment. Flanagan D. P. Alfonso V., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ;
60. Helland T.. Dyslexia at a behavioural and a cognitive level. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice. 2007 ; 13: 25-41
61. Hughes S. J. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 115-130.
62. Jimerson S. R., Burns M. K., VanDerHeyden A. M. Handbook of response to intervention. New York: Springer ; 2007
63. Johnson E. S., Humphrey M., Mellard D. F., Woods K., Swanson H. L.. Cognitive processing deficits and students with specific learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2010 ; 33: 3-18
64. Kaufman A. S. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 1-13.
65. Kavale K. A., Flanagan D. P. Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Jimerson S. R. Burns M. K. VanDerHeyden A. M., ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company ; 2007: 130-147.
66. Kavale K. A., Holdnack J. A., Mostert M. P.. Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2005 ; 28: 2-16
67. Kavale K. A., Kaufman A. S., Naglieri J. A., Hale J. B.. Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of poorly supported ideas. The School Psychologist. 2005 ; 43 (7). 753-770
68. Kemp S. L., Korkman M. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 266-278.
69. Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Innovation and Development ; 2002
70. Comments and recommendations on regulatory issues under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 P.L. 108-446. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs ; 2005
71. Lidz C. S., Pena E. D.. Response to intervention and dynamic assessment. Do we just appear to be speaking the same language?. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2009 ; 30: 121-133
72. Lovett M. W., Steinbach K. A., Frijters J. C.. Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000 ; 33: 334-358
73. MacHek G. R., Nelson J. M.. How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of practicing school psychologists. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2007 ; 22: 147-157
74. MacHekG. R.NelsonJ. M. (2010). School psychologists' perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the Schools. Published Online January 2010.
75. Mascolo J. T., Kaufman N. L., Hale J. B. Essentials of WISC-IV assessment. 2009 ). Illustrative case reports using the WISC-IV. In FlanaganD. P.KaufmanA. S. (Eds.), Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed., (p. 468-515). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Flanagan D. P. Kaufman A. S., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2009: 468-515.
76. Mastropieri M. A., Scruggs T. E.. Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 525-531
77. Mather N., Gregg N.. Specific learning disabilities: Clarifying, not eliminating, a construct. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2006 ; 37: 99-106
78. Mather N., Shaywitz S. Special and emergent topics in child and adolescent assessment. Reynolds C. R., ed. New York: Oxford University Press ;
79. Mazzocco M.M.M.. Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 318-323
80. Mazzocco M.M.M., Myers G. F.. Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school age years. Annals of Dyslexia. 2003 ; 53: 218-253
81. McGrewK. S.WendlingB. J. (in press). CHC cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned over the past 20 years. Psychology in the Schools.
82. Miller D. C. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 130-140.
83. Miller D. C., Hale J. B. WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention. 2008 ). Neuropsychological applications of the WISC-IV and WISC-IV Integrated. In PrifiteraA.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (2nd ed., (p. 445-495). New York: Elsevier Science. Prifitera A. Saklofske D. H. Weiss L. G., ed. New York: Elsevier Science ; 2008: 445-495.
84. Murphy M. M., Mazzocco M.M.M., Hanich L., Early M. C.. Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cut-off criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2007 ; 40: 458-478
85. Naglieri J. A., Johnson D.. Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000 ; 33: 591-597
86. Identification of students with specific learning disabilities. Bethesda, MD: Author ; 2007
87. Ofiesh N.. Response to intervention and identification of specific learning disabilities: Why we need comprehensive evaluations as part of the process. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 883-888
88. Peterson K.M.H., Shinn M. R.. Severe discrepancy models: Which best explains school identification practices for learning disabilities?. School Psychology Review. 2002 ; 31: 459-476
89. Reschly D. J.. Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 510-515
90. Reschly D. J., Hosp J. L.. State SLD policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2004 ; 27: 197-213
91. Reynolds C. R. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 14-27.
92. Reynolds C. R., Shaywitz S. E.. Response to intervention: Remediation, perhaps, diagnosis, no. Child Development Perspectives. 2009 ; 3: 44-47
93. Reynolds C. R., Shaywitz S. E.. Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly. 2009 ; 24: 130-145
94. Riccio C. A. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 82-98.
95. Richards T. L., Aylward E. H., Field K. M., Grimme A. C., Raskind W., Richards A. L., et al. Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2006 ; 30: 547-589
96. Schrank F. A., Miller J. A., Caterino L., Desrochers J.. American Academy of School Psychology survey on the independent educational evaluation for a specific learning disability: Results and discussion. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 771-780
97. Scruggs T. E., Mastropieri M. A.. On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2002 ; 25: 155-168
98. Semrud-Clikeman M., Fine J., Harder L. Handbook of school neuropsychology. D'Amato R. K. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons ; 2005
99. Semrud-Clikeman M.. Neuropsychological aspects for evaluating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 563-568
100. Shaywitz S. E., Shaywitz B. A., Fulbright R., Skudlarski P., Mencl W. E., Constable R. T., et al. Neural systems for compensation and persistence: Young adult outcome of childhood reading disability. Biological Psychiatry. 2003 ; 54: 25-33
101. Simos P. G., Fletcher J. M., Sarkari S., Billingsley R. L., Denton C., Papanicolaou A. C.. Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology. 2007 ; 21: 485-496
102. Smit-Glaude S.W.D., van Strien J. W., Licht R., Bakker D. J.. Neuropsychological intervention in kindergarten children with subtyped risks of reading retardation. Annals of Dyslexia. 2005 ; 55: 217-245
103. Speece D. L.. Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005 ; 38: 487-493
104. Stanovich K. E., Siegal L. S.. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1994 ; 86: 24-53
105. Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L.. Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: It's time to use a different method. Journal of School Psychology. 2002 ; 40: 65-83
106. Stuebing K. K., Fletcher J. M., LeDoux J. M.. Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal. 2002 ; 39: 469-518
107. Swanson H. L. Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Fletcher-Janzen E. Reynolds C. R., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons ; 2008: 28-53.
108. Tilly W. D., Reschly D. J., Grimes J. Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Reschly D. Tilly W. D. Grimes J., ed. Longmont, CO: Sopris West ; 1999: 285-321.
109. Torppa M., Tolvanen A., Poikkeus A., Eklund K., Lerkkanen M. K., Leskinen E., et al. Reading development subtypes and their early characteristics. Annals of Dyslexia. 2007 ; 57: 3-52
110. VanDerHeyden A. M., Witt J. C., Gilbertson D.. A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology. 2007 ; 45: 225-256
111. Vaughn S., Linan-Thompson S., Hickman P.. Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with learning/reading disabilities. Exceptional Children. 2003 ; 69: 391-409
112. Vellutino F. R., Scanlon D. M., Sipay E. R., Small S. G., Pratt A., Chen R., Denckla M. B.. Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1996 ; 88: 601-638
113. Warner T. D., Dede D. E., Garvan C. W., Conway T. W.. One size still does not fit all in specific learning disability assessment across ethnic groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2002 ; 35: 501-509
114. Willis J. O., Dumont R.. And never the twain shall meet: Can response to intervention and cognitive assessment be reconciled?. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 901-908
115. Wodrich D. L., Spencer M. L., Daley K. B.. Combining RTI and psychoeducational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise. Psychology in the Schools. 2006 ; 43: 797-806
116. Ysseldyke J. E., Marston D. Functional and noncategorical special education. Reschly D. Tilly D., ed. Longmont, CO: Sopris West ; 2000: 137-146.
117. Zirkel P. A., Krohn N.. RTI after IDEA: A survey of state laws. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2009 ; 40: 71-73