Specific learning disabilities: Clarifying, not eliminating, a construct

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 99-106

  Mather, Nancy ^a   Gregg, Noel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Diagnostic criteria; Discrepancy; Learning disabilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 32844459516     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.37.1.99     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Aaron, P. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
2. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
5. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Working memory and reading. In P. Kolers, E. Wrolstad, & H. Boruma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1, pp. 32-56). New York: Plenum Press.
7. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Baddeley, A. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851-864.
9. Baddeley, A. D., Vallar, G., & Wilson, B. (1987). Sentence comprehension and phonological memory: Some neuropsychological evidence. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 509-529). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Barsch, R. H. (1967). Achieving perceptual motor efficiency. Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
11. Bateman, B. (1992). Learning disabilities: The changing landscape. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 29-36.
12. Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34, 10-16.
13. Berninger, V. W. (2001). Understanding the "lexia" in dyslexia: A multidisciplinary team approach to learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 23-48.
14. Bowers, P. G., & Ishaik, G. (2003). RAN's contribution to understanding reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 140-157). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Brackett, J., & McPherson, A. (1996). Learning disabilities diagnosis in post-secondary students: A comparison of discrepancy-based diagnostic models. In N. Gregg, C. Hoy, & A. Gay (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 68-84). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153-193.
18. Cruickshank, W. M. (1983). Learning disabilities: A neurophysiological dysfunction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 27-29.
19. Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364-372.
20. Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Evans, J. J., Floyd, R. G., McGrew, K. S., & Leforgee, M. H. (2002). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review, 31, 246-262.
22. Flanagan, D., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment. New York: Wiley.
23. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2002). The achievement test desk reference (ATDR): Comprehensive assessment and learning disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Olson, R. K., et al. (2001, August). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education LD Summit, Washington, DC.
25. Fletcher, J. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of perpetuating old ideas. School Psychologist, 59, 10-15.
26. Flowers, L., Meyer, M., Lovato, J., Wood, F., & Felton, R. (2000). Does third grade discrepancy status predict the course of reading development? Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 49-71.
27. Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155-171.
28. Floyd, R., Gregg, N., & Keith, T. (2005). Reading comprehension across the lifespan. Unpublished manuscript.
29. Francis, J. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
30. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia, neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301-330). London: Erlbaum.
31. Frith, U. (1999). Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 5, 192-214.
32. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Compton, D. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216-227.
33. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
34. Gaddes, W. (1980). Learning disabilities and brain function: Neuropsychological approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Geary, D. C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem-solving differences and cognitive deficits. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 199-212). New York: Guilford Press.
36. Gregg, N. (in press). Thinking beyond: Learning disabilities and psychological assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.
37. Gregg, N., Bandalos, D., Coleman, C., Davis, M., & Jimenez, J. (in press). The dimensionality of phonological and orthographic awareness tasks for college students with and without dyslexia and AD/HD. Journal of Developmental Neuropsychology.
38. Gregg, N., Hoy, C., Flaherty, D. A., Norris, P., Coleman, C., Davis, M., et al. (2005). Decoding and spelling accommodations for postsecondary students with dyslexia: It's more than processing speed. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 1-17.
39. Gregg, N., & Scott, S. (2000). Definition and documentation: Theory, measurement, and the court. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 5-13.
40. Hale, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2004). School neuropsychology: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford Press.
41. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Hoeppner, J. B., & Gaitherer, R. A. (2001). WISC-III predictors of academic achievement for children with learning disabilities: Are global and factor scores comparable? School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 31-35.
42. Hale, J. B., Naglieri, J. A., Kaufman, A. S., & Kavale, K. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. School Psychologist, 58, 6-13.
43. Hessler, G. L. (1987). Educational issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 43-49.
44. Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock, WJ-R technical manual (pp. 197-232). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
45. Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive abilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53-91). New York: Guilford Press.
46. Hoy, C., Gregg, N., Wisenbaker, J., Bonham, S., King, M., & Moreland, C. (1996). Clinical model versus discrepancy model in determining eligibility for learning disabilities services at a rehabilitation setting. In N. Gregg, C. Hoy, & A. Gay (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 55-67). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-117, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
48. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1462 (h).
49. Johnson, D. J., & Myklebust, H. R. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.
50. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2001). Assessment of specific learning disabilities in the new millennium: Issues, conflicts, and controversies. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 433-461). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
52. Kavale, K. A. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 12-20.
53. Kavale, K. A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 553-562.
54. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 245-273.
56. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disabilities say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-256.
57. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2003). Learning disabilities as a discipline. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 76-93). New York: Guilford Press.
58. Kavale, K. A., Fuchs, D., & Scruggs, T. E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: Implications for policy-making. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 9, 70-77.
59. Kavale, K. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 2-16.
60. Kavale, K. A., Kaufman, A. S., Naglieri, J. A., & Hale, J. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of poorly supported ideas. School Psychologist, 59, 16-25.
61. Kephart, N. C. (1960). The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
62. Kirk, S. A., McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, W. D. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (Rev. ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
63. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. London: Penguin Books.
64. Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
65. Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-27.
66. Mather, N., & Healey, W. C. (1990). Deposing aptitude-achievement discrepancy as the imperial criterion for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 40-48.
67. Mather, N., & Wendling, B. (2005). Linking cognitive assessment results to academic interventions for students with learning disabilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 269-294). New York: Guilford Press.
68. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
69. McGrew, K. S., Flanagan, D. P., Keith, T. Z., & Vanderwood, M. (1997). Beyond g: The impact of Gf-Gc specific cognitive abilities research on the future use and interpretation of intelligence tests in the schools. School Psychology Review, 26, 177-189.
70. McGrew, K., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). WJ III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
71. Naglieri, J. A., & Bornstein, B. T. (2003). Intelligence and achievement: Just how correlated are they? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 244-260.
72. Naglieri, J. A., Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., & Kavale, K. A. (in press). Implementation of IDEA: Using RTI and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools.
73. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1997). Operationalizing the NJCLD definition of learning disabilities for ongoing assessment. Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.ldonline.org/njcld/ operatonalizing.html
74. Ofiesh, N., Mather, N., & Russell, A. (2005). Using speeded cognitive, reading, and academic measures to determine the need for extended test time among university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 35-52.
75. Parrill, M. (1987). Developmental issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 32-41.
76. Reynolds, C. R. (2005, August). Considerations in RTI as a method of diagnosis of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Institute for Psychology in the Schools of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
77. Robinson, C. S., Menchetti, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Toward a two-factor theory of one type of mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 81-90.
78. Schrank, F. A., Teglasi, H., Wolf, I. L., Miller, J. A., Caterino, L. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (2005). American Academy of School Psychology reply to response-to-intervention perspective. School Psychologist, 59, 30-33.
79. Scruggs, T. E. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy: A discussion. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 23-25.
80. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155-168.
81. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.
82. Shessel, I., & Reiff, H. B. (1999). Experiences of adults with learning disabilities: Positive and negative impacts and outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 305-316.
83. Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 618-629.
84. Silver, A. A., & Hagin, R. A. (2002). Disorders of learning in childhood (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
85. Sireci, S. (2005). Unlabeling the disabled: A perspective on flagging scores from accommodated test administrations. Educational Researcher, 34(1), 3-12.
86. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350-361.
87. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: Author.
88. Vellutino, F. R. (2001). Further analysis of the relationship between reading achievement and intelligence: A response to Naglieri. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 306-310.
89. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.
90. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Wilson, K. M., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). Are mathematics disabilities due to a domain-general or a domain-specific working memory deficit? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 237-248.
92. Wilson, V. L. (1987). Statistical and psychometric issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 21-23.
93. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
94. Woodcock, R. W. (1984). A response to some questions raised about the Woodcock-Johnson: Efficacy of the aptitude clusters. School Psychology Review, 13, 355-362.
95. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). The Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.