Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 85-95

  Berkeley, Sheri ^a   Bender, William N ^a   Gregg Peaster, Lindsay ^a   Saunders, Lauren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Identification; policy; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; LEGAL ASPECT; MASS SCREENING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); UNITED STATES;

EID: 58049179916     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219408326214     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bender, W.N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2. Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2005). Response to intervention: 1997. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 8-13.
3. Burke County Public Schools, NC. (2005). Problem solving model (PSM). Available at http://www.dpi.state.nc.us
4. Daly, E.J., Kupzyk, S., Bossard, M., Street, J., & Dymacek, R. (in press). Taking RtI "to scale": Developing and implementing a quality RtI process. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices.
5. Denton, C.A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J.M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 201-211.
6. Deshler, D.D., Mellard, D.F., Tollefson, J.M., & Byrd, S.E. (2005). Research topics in responsiveness to intervention: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 483-484. Division for Learning Disabilities. (2007). Thinking about response to intervention and learning disabilities: A teacher's guide. Arlington, VA: Author.
7. Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K., et al. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness to intervention: Definition, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157-171.
9. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 14-20.
10. Iowa Department of Education. (2007). Instructional decision making (IDM). Available at http//www.iowa.gov
11. Johnson, E., Mellard, D.F., & Byrd, S.E. (2005). Alternative models of learning disabilities identification: Considerations and initial conclusions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 569-572.
12. Johnson, E., Mellard, D.F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M.A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
13. Kavale, K. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer ? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 553-562.
14. Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 38, 539-544.
15. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 525-531.
16. Mercer, C.D., Jordan, L., Allsop, D.H., & Mercer, A.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217-232.
17. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author. Available at http://www.5.nasdse.org
18. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2007 a). Core concepts of RTI. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from www.nrcld.org
19. National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2007 b). Responsiveness to intervention in the SLD determination process [Brochure]. Lawrence, KS: Author.
20. Reschly, D.J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510-515.
21. Reschly, D.J., & Hosp, J.L., (2004). State SLD policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 197-213.
22. Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2005). Neuropsychological aspects for evaluating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 563-568.
23. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137-146.
24. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to treatment as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.