Severe discrepancy models: Which best explains school identification practices for learning disabilities?

School Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 459-476

  Peterson, Kristin M H ^a   Shinn, Mark R ^b  

^a Robbinsdale Area School District   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036989563     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The over sophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242-246.
2. Balow, I. H., Farr, R. C., & Hagan, T. P. (1992). Metropolitan Achievement Test 7. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
3. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.
4. Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 163-184). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
5. Children's Educational Services, Inc. (1987). Test of Reading Fluency. Minneapolis, MN.
6. CTB/ Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. (1993). California Achievement Test/5. Monterey, CA: Author.
7. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
8. Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. New York: Guilford.
9. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
10. Epps, S., Ysseldyke, J. E, & McGue, M. (1984). "I know one when I see one" - Differentiating LD and non-LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 89-101.
11. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555-561.
12. Frankenberger, W., & Franzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
13. Frankenberger, W., & Harper, J. (1987). States' criteria and procedures for identifying learning disabled children: A comparison of 1981/82 and 1985/86 guidelines. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 118-121.
14. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. O., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Reading differences between low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research (pp. 105-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M. E., & Eaton, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of reading differences between underachievers with and without the disability label: A brief report. Learning Disabilities, 10, 1-4.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, S. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-28.
17. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advances in curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B. W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453-465.
19. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., & Bocian, K. M. (1996). Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: More alike than different? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 570-581.
20. Grimes, J. P., & Tilly W. D. (1996). Policy and process: Means to lasting educational change. School Psychology Review, 25, 431-445.
21. Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designs. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
22. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Wood, F. B., Schulte, A., & Olson, R. (2001). Learning disabilities: An evidence-based conceptualization (pp. 259-283). Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation.
23. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it? In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: The Guilford Press.
24. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Allsop, D. H., & Mercer, A. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217-232.
25. Minnesota Department of Children, Families, and Learning. (1998). Minnesota SLD Companion manual. St. Paul, MN: Author.
26. Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., III, & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1999). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
27. Reschly, D. J., & Wilson, M. S. (1995). School psychology faculty and practitioners: 1986-1991 trends in demographic characteristics, roles, satisfaction, and system reform. School Psychology Review, 24, 62-78.
28. Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1995). School psychology paradigm shift. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp. 17-31). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
29. Reynolds, M. C., & Heistad, D. (1997). 20/20 analysis: Estimating school effectiveness in serving students at the margins. Exceptional Children, 63, 439-449.
30. Ross, R. P. (1995). Impact on psychologists of state guidelines for evaluating underachievement. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 43-56.
31. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children; WISC-III and WPPSI-R supplement. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
32. Shaw, S. F., Cullen, J. P., McGuire, J. M., & Brinckerhoff, L.C. (1995). Operationalizing a definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 586-597.
33. Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145-150.
34. Shepard, L. A., Smith, M. L., & Vojir, C. P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309-331.
35. Shinn, M. R. (2002). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 671-698). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
36. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
37. Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., & Parker, C. (1999). Noncategorical special education services with students with severe achievement deficits. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, III, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional and noncategorical identification programming (pp. 81-105). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
38. Shinn, R. M., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Administration and scoring of Reading curriculum-based measurement (RCBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, Mn. Edformation, Inc.
39. Shinn, M. R., Tindal, G. A., Spira, D., & Marston, D. (1987). Practice of learning disabilities as social policy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 17-28.
40. Shinn, M. R., Ysseldyke, J. E., Deno, S. L., & Tindal, G. A. (1986). A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545-552.
41. Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 618-629.
42. Singer, J. D., Palfrey, J. S., Butler, W., & Walker, D. K. (1989). Variation in special education classification across school districts: How does where you live affect what you are labeled? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 261-281.
43. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definition of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
44. Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
45. Tilly, W. D., III, Reschly, D. J., & Grimes, J. (1999). Disability determination in problem-solving systems: Conceptual foundations and critical components. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, III, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 285-321). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
46. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
47. U.S. Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education for handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. (Federal Register, 42:62082-62085).
48. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
49. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children - Third Edition (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
50. Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M. (1989/1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
51. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1983). LD or not LD: That's not the question! Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 9-31.
52. Ysseldyke, J., Algozzine, B., & Epps, S. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practice in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160-166.