Differential Ability Acales - Second Edition (neuro)psychological predictors of math performance for typical children and children with math disabilities

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 838-858

  Hale, James B ^a   Fiorello, Catherine A ^b   Dumont, Ron ^c   Willis, John O ^d   Rackley, Christopher ^e   Elliott, Colin ^f  

^a PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d RIVIER COLLEGE   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CHILD STUDY CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55549089288     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20330     Document Type: Review

References (139)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
2. Basso, A., Burgio, F., & Caporali, A. (2000). Acalculia, aphasia and spatial disorders in left and right brain-damaged patients. Cortex, 36, 265-280.
3. Berninger, V. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. New York: Academic Press.
4. Brody, N. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52, 1046-1050.
5. Bryan, K. L. & Hale, J. B. (2001). Differential effects of left and right hemisphere accidents on language competency. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 655-664.
6. Calhoun, S. L., & Mayes, S. D. (2005). Processing speed in children with clinical disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 333-343.
7. Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (1998). Long term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 10, 285-291.
8. Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (1999). Long term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition among demographic subgroups: Gender, race, and age. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 300-313.
9. Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2001). Long term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition among students with disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30(2), 438-453.
10. Cao, F., Bitan, T., Chou, T. L., Burman, D. D., & Booth, J. R. (2006). Deficient orthographic and phonological representations in children with dyslexia revealed by brain activation patterns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47, 1041-1050.
11. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Carroll, J. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 122-130). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Casanova, M. F., Christensen, J. D., Giedd, J., Rumsey, J. M., Garver, D. L., & Postel, G. C. (2005). Magnetic resonance imaging study of brain asymmetries in dyslexic patients. Journal of Child Neurology, 20, 842-847.
14. Castellanos, F. X., Lee, P. P., Sharp, W., Jeffries, N. O., Greenstein, D. K., Clasen, L. S., et al. (2002). Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1740-1748.
15. Ceci, S., & Williams, S. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051-1058.
16. Collins, D. W., & Rourke, B. P. (2003). Learning-disabled brains: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 1011-1034.
17. Daleo, D. V., Lopez, B. R., Cole, J. C., Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., Newcomer, B. L., et al. (1999). K-ABC simultaneous processing, DAS nonverbal reasoning, and Horn's expanded fluid-crystallized theory. Psychological Reports, 84, 563-574.
18. Daniel, M. H. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends. American Psychologist, 52, 1038-1045.
19. Demb, J. B., Boynton, G. M., & Heeger, D. J. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6939-6951.
20. DiCerbo, K. E., & Barona, A. (2000). A convergent validity study of the Differential Ability Scales and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition with Hispanic children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 344-352.
21. Dumont, R., Cruse, C., Price, L., & Whelley, P. (1996). The relationship between the Differential Ability Scales and the WISC-III for students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 203-209.
22. Dumont, R., Willis, J., & Sattler, J. M. (2001). Differential ability scales. In J. M. Sattler (Ed.), Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed., pp. 507-545). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.
23. Dunham, M., McIntosh, D., & Gridley, B. E. (2002). An independent confirmatory factor analysis of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 152-163.
24. Eden, G. F., VanMeter, J. W., Rumsey, J. M., Maison, J. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1996). Functional MRI reveals differences in visual motion processing in individuals with dyslexia. Nature, 382, 66-69.
25. Elliott, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
26. Elliott, C. D. (2001). Application of the British Ability Scales (BAS II) and Differential Ability Scales (DAS) for the assessment of specific learning disabilities. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 178-217). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales, 2nd edition: Introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
28. Fiez, J. A., & Petersen, S. E. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 914-921.
29. Filipek, P. A. (1999). Neuroimaging in the developmental disorders: The state of the science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 113-128.
30. Fine, J. G., Semrud-Clikeman, M., Keith, T. Z., Stapleton, L. M., & Hynd, G. W. (2007). Reading and the corpus callosum: An MRI family study of volume and area. Neuropsychology, 21, 235-241.
31. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., Holdnack, J. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Terrell, J., & Long, L. (2007). Interpreting intelligence test results for children with disabilities: Is global intelligence relevant? Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 2-12.
32. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., McGrath, M., Ryan, K., & Quinn, S. (2001). IQ interpretation for children with flat and variable test profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 115-125.
33. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., & Snyder, L. E. (2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to children with reading problems. Psychology in the Schools, 43(8), 835-853.
34. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., Snyder, L. E., Forrest, E., & Teodori, A. (2008). Validating individual differences through examination of converging psychometric and neuropsychological models of cognitive functioning. In S. K. Thurman & C. A. Fiorello (Eds.), Appled Cognitive Research to K-3 Classroom Learning (pp. 232-254). New York, NY: Routledge.
35. Fiorello, C. A., & Primerano, D. P. (2005). Research into practice: Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive assessment in practice: Eligibility and program development issues. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 525-535.
36. Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1997). A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (pp. 314-325). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Flanagan, D. P, McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Flanagan, D. P., & Ortiz, S. O. (2001). Essentials of cross-battery assessment. New York: Wiley & Sons.
39. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
40. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V., & Mascolo, J. T. (2002). Achievement test desk reference (ATDR): Comprehensive assessment and learning disability. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Fleischner, J.E. (1994). Diagnosis and assessment of mathematics learning disabilities. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of references for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 441-458). Baltimore: Brookes.
42. Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 155-171.
43. Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Stuebing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
44. Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2001).Numerical and arithmetical deficits in learning-disabled children: Relation to dyscalculia and dyslexia. Aphasiology, 15, 635-647.
45. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., & Hamson, C. O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213-239.
46. Gibney, L., McIntosh, D., Dean, R., & Dunham, M. (2002). Diagnosing attention disorders with measures of neurocognitive functioning. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 539-564.
47. Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., Konold, T. R., Snelbaker, A. J., & Watkins, M. W. (1998). More ups and downs of subtest analysis: Criterion validity of the DAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Review, 27, 599-612.
48. Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., Prifitera, A., & McGrath, E. A. (1994). Core profile types for the WISC-III and WIAT: Development and their application in identifying multivariate IQ-achievement discrepancies. School Psychology Review, 23, 619-639.
49. Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., Kush, J. C., & Konold, T. R. (1997). The base rate problem and its consequences for interpreting children's ability profiles. School Psychology Review, 26, 176-188.
50. Glutting, J. J., McGrath, E. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & McDermott, P. A. (1992). Taxonomy and validity of subtest profiles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 85-115.
51. Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 103-114.
52. Glutting, J. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Ward, T., Ward, S., & Hale, R. L. (1997). Incremental efficacy of WISC-III factor scores in predicting achievement: What do they tell us? Psychological Assessment, 9, 295-301.
53. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.
54. Gresham, F. M., and Witt, J. C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249-267.
55. Groth-Marnat, G., Gallagher, R. E., Hale, J. B., & Kaplan, E. (2000). The Wechsler intelligence scales. In G. Groth-Marnat (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in clinical practice (pp. 129-194). New York: Wiley.
56. Hale, J. B. (2006). Implementing IDEAwith a three-tier model that includes response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. School Psychology Forum: Research and Practice, 1, 16-27.
57. Hale, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2001). Beyond the academic rhetoric of 'g': Intelligence testing guidelines for practitioners. The School Psychologist, 55, 113-117, 131-135, 138-139.
58. Hale, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2002). Cross-battery cognitive assessment approaches to test interpretation: Are you a clumper or a splitter? Communiqué, 31(1), 37-40.
59. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., & Brown, L. (2005). Determining medication treatment effects using teacher ratings and classroom observations of children with ADHD: Does neuropsychological impairment matter? Educational and Child Psychology, 22, 39-61.
60. Hale, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2004). School neuropsychology: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford Press.
61. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Hoeppner, J. B., & Gaither, R. A. (2001). WISC-III predictors of academic achievement for children with learning disabilities: Are global and factor scores comparable? School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 31-55.
62. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Aloe, A. M. (2007). Is the demise of IQ interpretation justified? A response to special issue authors. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 37-51.
63. Hale, J. B., Hoeppner, J. B., & Fiorello, C. A. (2002). Analyzing digit span components to assessment of attention processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(2), 128-143.
64. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Bertin, M., & Sherman, R. (2003). Predicting math competency through neuropsychological interpretation of WISC-III variance components. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 358-380.
65. Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J. A., & Kavale, K. A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43(7), 753-770.
66. Hale, J. B., Naglieri, J., Kaufman, A. S., & Kavale, K. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 58(1), 6-14.
67. Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Miller, J. A., Wenrich, K., Teodori, A. M., & Henzel, J. (2008). WISC-IV assessment and intervention strategies for children with specific learning disabilities. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 109-171). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
68. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
69. Holland, A. M., & McDermott, P. A. (1996). Discovering core profile types in the school-age standardization sample of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 131-146.
70. Hughes, T. L. & McIntosh, D. E. (2002). Differential Ability Scales: Profiles of preschoolers with cognitive delay. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 19-29.
71. Isaacs, E. B., Edmonds, C. J., Lucas, A., & Gadian, D. G. (2001). Calculation difficulties in childrenwith very low birthweight. Brain, 124, 1701-1707.
72. Ivry, R. (1997). Cerebellar timing systems. International Review of Neurobiology, 41, 555-573.
73. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
74. Kahana, S. Y., Youngstrom, E. A., & Glutting, J. J. (2002). Factor and subtest discrepancies on the Differential Ability Scales: Examining prevalence and validity in predicting academic achievement. Assessment, 9, 82-93.
75. Kamphaus, R. W. (2001). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
76. Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice (pp. 125-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
77. Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley Interscience.
78. Kavale, K. A., Kaufman, A. S., Naglieri, J. A., & Hale, J. B. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of poorly supported ideas. The School Psychologist, 43(7), 753-770.
79. Keith, T. Z. (1990). Confirmatory and hierarchical confirmatory analysis of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 391-405.
80. Keith, T. Z., Quirk, K. J., Schartzer, C., & Elliott, C. D. (1999). Construct bias in the Differential Ability Scales? Confirmatory and hierarchical factor structure across three ethnic groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 249-268.
81. Kennedy, J. E., Clement, P. F., & Curtiss, G. (2003). WAIS-III processing speed index scores after TBI: The influence of working memory, psychomotor speed and perceptual processing. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 303-307.
82. Kercher, A. C., & Sandoval, J. (1991). Reading disability and the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 293-307.
83. Leonard, C. M., Lombardino, L. J., Giess, S. A., & King, W. M. (2005). Behavioral and anatomical distinctions between dyslexia and SLI. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds). The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 155-172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
85. Lichter, D. G., & Cummings, J. L. (Eds.). (2001). Frontal-subcortical circuits in psychiatric and neurological disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
86. Macmann, G. M., & Barnett, D. W. (1997). Myth of the master detective: Reliability of interpretations of Kaufman's "intelligence testing" approach to the WISC-III. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 197-234.
87. Maller, S. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1997). WAIS-R profile analysis for college students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 26, 575-585.
88. Mather, N., & Gregg, N. (2006). Specific learning disabilities: Clarifying, not eliminating, a construct. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(1), 99-106.
89. Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2006). WISC-IV and WISC-III profiles in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 486-493.
90. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2001). Math learning disability and math LD subtypes: Evidence from studies of Turner syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, and neurofibromatosis type 1. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(6), 520-533.
91. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290-302.
92. McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's ability. Journal of Special Education, 25, 504-526.
93. McDermott, P. A., & Glutting, J. J. (1997). Informing stylistic learning behavior, disposition, and achievement through ability subtests - or more illusions of meaning? School Psychology Review, 26, 163-175.
94. McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment (pp. 151-179). New York: Guilford Press.
95. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
96. McGrew, K. S., Flanagan, D. P., Keith, T. Z., & Vanderwood, M. (1997). Beyond g: The impact of Gf-Gc specific cognitive abilities research on the future use and interpretation of intelligence tests in the schools. School Psychology Review, 26, 189-210.
97. McIntosh, D. E., & Gridley, B. E. (1993). Differential Ability Scales: Profiles of learning-disabled subtypes. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 11-24.
98. Miller, D. C. (2007). Essentials of school neuropsychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
99. Miller, D. C., & Hale, J. B. (2008). Neuropsychological applications of the WISC-IV and WISC-IV Integrated. In A. Prifitera, D. Saklofske, & L.Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist - Practitioner perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Elsevier.
100. Naglieri, J. A., & Bornstein, B. T. (2003). Intelligence and achievement: Just how correlated are they? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 244-260.
101. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
102. Nicholson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., (2001). Dyslexia, learning and the cerebellum. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 159-188). Timonium, MD: York Press.
103. Njiokiktjien, C., de Rijke, W., & Jonkman, E. J. (2001). Children with nonverbal learning disabilities (NLD): Coherence values in the resting state may reflect hypofunctional long distance connections in the right hemisphere. Human Physiology, 27(5), 523-528.
104. Ortiz, S. O., & Flanagan, D. P. (2002a). Cross-Battery Assessment revisited: Some cautions concerning "Some Cautions" (Part I). Communiqué, 30(7), 32-34.
105. Ortiz, S. O., & Flanagan, D. P. (2002b). Cross-Battery Assessment revisited: Some cautions concerning "Some Cautions" (Part II). Communiqué, 30(8), 36-38.
106. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
107. Pfeiffer, S. I., Reddy, L. A., Kletzel, J. E., Schmelzer, E. R., & Boyer, L. M. (2000). A practitioner's view of IQ testing and profile analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 376-385.
108. Platt, L. O., Kamphaus, R.W., Keltgen, J., & Gilliland, F. (1991). An overview and review of the Differential Ability Scales: Initial and current research findings. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 271-277.
109. Prifitera, A., Weiss, L. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III: Clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 1-38). San Diego: Academic Press.
110. Proctor, B. E., Floyd, R. G., & Shaver, R. B. (2005). Cattell-Horn-Carroll broad cognitive ability profiles of low math achievers. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 1-12.
111. Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second edition: Examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.
112. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., et al. (2000). The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: Task-specific difference in functional connectivity within posterior cortex. Psychological Science, 11, 51-56.
113. Reschley, D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 510-515.
114. Reschley, D. J., & Gresham, F. M. (1989). Current neuropsychological diagnosis of learning problems: A leap of faith. In C. R. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Child neuropsychology techniques in diagnosis and treatment (pp. 503-519). New York: Plenum.
115. Riccio, C. A., Ross, C. M., Boan, C. H., Jemison, S., & Houston, F. (1997). Use of the Differential Ability Scale (DAS) special nonverbal composite among young children with linguistic differences. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 194-204.
116. Richards, T. L., Aylward, E. H., Field, K. M., Grimme, A. C. Raskind, W., Richards, A. L., et al. (2006). Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 547-589.
117. Roberts, R. D., Goff, G. N., Anjoul, F., Kyllonen, P. C., Pallier, G., & Stankov, L. (2000). The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB)-Little more than acculturated learning (Gc)!? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 81-103.
118. Rourke, B. P. (1995). Introduction: The NLD syndrome and the white matter model. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: Neurodevelopmental manifestations (pp. 1-26). New York: Guilford Press.
119. Ruff, C. C., Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., & Spreer, J. (2003). Reasoning and working memory: Common and distinct neuronal processes. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1241-1253.
120. Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.
121. Schatz, A. M., Ballantyne, A. O., & Trauner, D. A. (2000). A hierarchical analysis of block design errors in children with early focal brain damage. Development Neuropsychology, 17, 75-83.
122. Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Pliszka, S. R. (2005). Neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(2), 172-186.
123. Shapiro, S. K., Buckhalt, J. A., & Herod, L. A. (1995). Evaluation of learning disabled students with the Differential Ability Scales (DAS). Journal of School Psychology, 33, 247-263.
124. Shaywitz, B. A., Lyon, G. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2006). The role of functional magnetic imaging in understanding reading and dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30(1), 613-632.
125. Smith, L. A., & Rourke, B. P. (1995). Callosal Agenesis. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilitie. Neurodevelopmental Manifestations (pp. 45-92). New York: Guilford Press.
126. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
127. Stein, J. F. (2001). The neurobiology of reading difficulties. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 3-22). Timonium, MD: York Press.
128. Tallal, P. (2006). What happens when 'dyslexic' subjects do not meet the criteria for dyslexia and sensorimotor tasks are too difficult even for the controls? Developmental Science, 9(3), 262-264.
129. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1.
130. Tulving, E., & Markowitsch, H. J. (1997). Memory beyond the hippocampus. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 209-216.
131. van der Heijden, P., & Donders, J. (2003). WAIS-III factor index score patterns after traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 10(2), 115-122.
132. Watkins, M. W., & Glutting, J. J. (2000). Incremental validity of WISC-III profile elevation, scatter, and shape information for predicting reading and math achievement. Psychological Assessment, 12, 402-408.
133. Watkins, M. W., Glutting, J. J., & Lei, P. W. (2007). Validity of the full-scale IQ when there is significant variability among WISC-III and WISC-IV factor scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 13-20.
134. Watkins, M. W., Youngstrom, E. A., & Glutting, J. J. (2002). Some cautions regarding Cross-Battery Assessment. Communiqué, 30(6), 16-20.
135. Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8(3), 231-258.
136. Woodcock, R. W. (1993). An information processing view of Gf-Gc theory. In B. A. Bracken & R. S. McCallum (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised (pp. 80-102). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company.
137. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
138. Youngstrom, E. A., Kogos, J. L., & Glutting, J. J. (1999). Incremental efficacy of the Differential Ability Scales factor scores in predicting individual achievement criteria. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 26-39.
139. Zadina, J. N., Corey, D. M., & Casbergue, R. M. (2006). Lobar asymmetries in subtypes of dyslexic and control subjects. Journal of Child Neurology, 21(11), 922-931.