Response to intervention and dynamic assessment: Do we just appear to be speaking the same language?

Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 121-134

  Lidz, Carol S ^a   Peña, Elizabeth D ^b  

^a One University Station ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment of learning potential; Dynamic assessment; Interactive assessment; Language development; Language disorders; Learning disabilities; Response to instruction; Response to intervention; Responsiveness to intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEARNING DISORDER; METHODOLOGY; SPEECH DISORDER;

CHILD; CHILD LANGUAGE; EDUCATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DISORDERS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY;

EID: 77149144477     PISSN: 09482393     EISSN: 14391651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215719     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Cole KN, Dale PS, Mills PE. Stability of the intelligence quotient-language quotient relation: is discrepancy modeling based on a myth? Am J Ment Retard 1992;97:131-143
2. Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL. Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: it's time to use a different method. J Sch Psychol 2002;40:65-83
3. Miller CA, Gilbert E. Comparison of performance on two nonverbal intelligence tests by adolescents with and without language impairment. J Commun Disord 2008;41:358-371
4. Plante E. Criteria for SLI: the Stark and Tallal legacy and beyond. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41:951-957
5. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub L No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
6. Feuerstein R. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press; 1979
7. Feuerstein R, Miller R, Rand Y, Jensen M. Can evolving techniques better measure cognitive change? J Spec Educ 1981;15:201-219
8. Feuerstein R, Rand Y, Jensen MR, Kaniel S, Tzuriel D. Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential: the LPAD model. In: Lidz CS, ed. Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1987:33-51
9. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978
10. Vygotsky LS. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986
11. Haywood HC, Lidz CS. Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007
12. Bransford JD, Delclos VR, Vye NJ, Burns MS, Hasselbring TS. State of the art and future directions. In: Lidz CS, ed. Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1987:479-496
13. Lidz CS, Elliott JG. Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. New York, NY: Elsevier Science; 2000
14. Lidz CS. Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1991
15. Fuchs D, Fuchs LS, Compton DL. Dynamic Assessment for Young At-Risk Readers [Unpublished test]. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University; 2007
16. Fuchs LS, Compton DL, Fuchs D, Hollenbeck KN, Craddock CF, Hamlett CL. Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders' development of mathematical problem solving. J Educ Psychol 2008;100:829-850
17. Spector J. Predicting progress in beginning reading: dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. J Educ Psychol 1992;84:353-363
18. Gerber MM. Dynamic assessment for students with learning disabilities: lessons in theory and design. In: Lidz CS, Elliot JE, eds. Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: JAI/Elsevier; 2000: 263-292
19. Lidz CS. Dynamic Assessment: An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1987
20. Hasson N, Joffe V. The case for dynamic assessment in speech and language therapy. Child Lang Teach Ther 2007;23:9-25
21. Miller L, Gillam RB, Peña ED. Dynamic Assessment and Intervention: Improving Children's Narrative Skills. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 2001
22. Ukrainetz TA, Harpell S, Walsh C, Coyle C. A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2000;31:142-154
23. Burton VJ, Watkins RV. Measuring word learning: dynamic versus static assessment of kindergarten vocabulary. J Commun Disord 2007;40: 335-356
24. Olswang L, Bain B, Johnson G. Using dynamic assessment with children with language disorders. In: Warren SF, Reichle J, eds. Causes and Effects in Communication and Language Intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1992:187-216
25. Roseberry CA, Connell PJ. The use of an invented language rule in the differentiation of normal and language-impaired Spanish-speaking children. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:596-603
26. Jacobs EL. The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Comm Disord Q 2001; 22:217-226
27. Laing SP, Kamhi A. Alternative assessment of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2003;34:44-55
28. Kozulin A. Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. Sch Psychol Int 2002;23:7-35
29. Lidz CS. Mediated learning experience (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment. Sch Psychol Int 2002;23:68-84
30. Peña ED, Gillam RB, Malek M, et al. Dynamic assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds: applications to narrative assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006;49:1037-1057
31. Peña ED, Iglesias A, Lidz CS. Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2001; 10:138-154
32. Restrepo MA, Schwanenflugel PJ, Blake J, Neuharth-Pritchett S, Cramer SE, Ruston HP. Performance on the PPVT-III and the EVT: applicability of the measures with African American and European American preschool children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006;37:17-27
33. Peña ED, Gillam RB. Dynamic assessment of children referred for speech and language evaluations. In: Lidz CS, Elliott J, eds. Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models and Applications. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; 2000
34. Peña ED, Gillam R, Resendiz M. The role of clinical judgments of modifiability in the diagnosis of language impairment. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 2007;9:332-345
35. Dunn L, Dunn L. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 3rd ed. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1997
36. Bain B, Olswang L. Examining readiness for learning two-word utterances by children with specific expressive language impairment: dynamic assessment validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1995;4:81-92
37. Olswang L, Bain B. When to recommend intervention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1991; 22:255-263
38. Olswang L, Bain B. Assessment information for predicting upcoming change in language production. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:414-423
39. Donaldson AL, Olswang LB. Investigating requests for information in children with autism spectrum disorders: static versus dynamic assessment. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 2007;9:297-311
40. Glaspey A, Stoel-Gammon C. A dynamic approach to phonological assessment. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 2007;9:286-296
41. Healy K, Vanderwood M, Edelston D. Early literacy interventions for English language learners: support for an RTI model. Calif Sch Psychol 2005;10:55-63
42. Abbott SP, Berninger VW. It's never too late to remediate: teaching word recognition to students with reading disabilities in grades 4-7. Ann Dyslexia 1999;49:223-250
43. Abbott SP, Reed E, Abbott RD, Berninger VW. Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: a design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learn Disabil Q 1997;20:249-263
44. Sternberg RJ. Raising the achievement of all students: teaching for successful intelligence. Educ Psychol Rev 2002;14:383-393
45. Ysseldyke J. Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: what if this is as good as it gets? Learn Disabil Q 2005;28:125-128
46. Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL. Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002
47. Mastropieri MA, Scruggs TE. Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2005;38:525-531
48. Marston D. Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. J Learn Disabil 2005;38:539-544
49. Fletcher JM, Francis DJ, Morris RD, Lyon GR. Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2005;34:506-522
50. Elksnin LK. Identification of learning disabilities: research to practice. Psychol Sch 2004;41:581-585
51. Grigorenko EL. Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: two sides of one coin. J Learn Disabil. 2009;42(2):111-132
52. Moore-Brown BJ, Montgomery JK, Bielinski J, Shubin J. Responsiveness to intervention: teaching before testing helps avoid labeling. Top Lang Disord 2005;25:148-167
53. Moore-Brown BJ, Hueta M, Uranga-Hernandez Y, Peña ED. Using dynamic assessment to evaluate children with suspected learning disabilities. Intervent Sch Clin 2006;41:209-217
54. Vellutino FR, Scanlon DM, Sipay ER, et al. Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. J Educ Psychol 1996;88:601-638
55. Denton CA, Fletcher JM, Anthony JL, Francis DJ. An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. J Learn Disabil 2006;39:447-466
56. Hilden KR, Pressley M. Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Read Writ Q 2007;23:51-75
57. Pressley M. Cognitive Strategy Instruction That Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books; 1990
58. Kovaleski JF. Response to intervention: considerations for research and systems change. School Psych Rev 2007;36:638-646
59. Kovaleski JF. Potential pitfalls of response to intervention. In: Jimerson SR, Burns MK, Van-DerHeyden AM, eds. Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Assessment and Intervention. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media; 2007:80-89
60. Caffrey E, Fuchs D, Fuchs LS. The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: a review. J Spec Educ 2008;41:254-270
61. Fuchs D, Fuchs LS, Compton DL, Bouton B, Caffrey E, Hill L. Dynamic assessment as responsiveness of intervention: a scripted protocol to identify young at-risk readers. Teaching Exceptional Children 2007;39:58-63
62. O'Connor RE, Fulmer D, Harty KR, Bell KM. Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: changes in teaching and student outcomes. J LearnDisabil 2005;38:440-455
63. O'Connor RE, Harty KR, Fulmer D. Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. J Learn Disabil 2005;38:532-538
64. Ehren BJ, Nelson NW. The responsiveness to intervention approach and language impairment. Top Lang Disord 2005;25:120-131
65. Roth FP, Troia GA, Worthington CK, Handy D. Promoting awareness of sounds in speech (PASS): the effects of intervention and stimulus characteristics on the blending performance of preschool children with communication impairments. Learn Disabil Q 2006;29:67-88
66. Justice LM. Evidence-based practice, response to intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006;37: 284-297
67. Walpole S, Justice LM, Invernizzi MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: case study of school-wide literacy reform. Read Writ Q 2004; 20:261-283
68. Ukrainetz TA. The implications of RTI and EBP for SLPs: commentary on L. M. Justice. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006;37:298-303
69. Catts HW, Fey ME, Zhang X, Tomblin JB. Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: a research-based model and its clinical implementation. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2001;32:38-50
70. Tomblin JB. A normativist account of languagebased learning disability. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2006;21:8-18
71. Haywood HC, Brooks P, Burns S. Bright Start: Cognitive Curriculum for Young Children. Watertown, MA: Charles Bridge; 1992
72. Stubbe Kester E, Peña ED, Gillam RB. Outcomes of dynamic assessment with culturally and linguistically diverse students: a comparison of three teaching methods. J Cogn Educ Psychol 2001;2: 42-59
73. Cole KN, Dale P. Direct language instruction and interactive language instruction with language delayed preschool children: a comparison study. J Speech Hear Res 1986;29:206-217