Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 362-380

  Ardoin, Scott P ^a   Witt, Joseph C ^b   Connell, James E ^c   Koenig, Jennifer L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646502808     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073428290502300405     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., III, Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38 (2). 66-79.
2. Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32 (4). 557-582.
3. Daly, E. J., III, Lentz, F. E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369-386.
4. Derr-Minneci, T. F., & Shapiro, E. S. (1992). Validating curriculum-based measurement in reading from a behavioral perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 2-16.
5. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daisey, D. M., & Scarola, M. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: The use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463-473.
6. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., III, & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.
7. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabil Res Pract, 18 (3). 157-171.
8. Fuchs, L. S. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement and eligibility decision making: An emphasis on treatment validity and growth.Paper presented at the Workshop on Alternatives to IQ Testing, Washington, DC.
9. Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172-186.
10. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13 (4). 204-219.
11. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16 (2). 85-95.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 101 (5). 495-509.
13. Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Heller, K., Holtzman, W., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press.
15. Hintze, J. M., Christ, T., J., & Keller, L. A. (2002). The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need? School Psychology Review, 31 (4). 514-528.
16. Lee, M. J., & Tingstrom, D. H. (1994). A group math intervention: The modification of cover, copy, and compare for group application. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 133-145.
17. Martens, B. K., Hiralall, A. S., & Bradley, T. A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12 (1). 33-41.
18. Noell, G. H., Freeland, J. T., & Witt, J. C. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39 (4). 335-355.
19. O'Connor, R. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15 (1). 43-54.
20. Rhymer, K. N., Dittmer, K. I., Skinner, C. H., & Jackson, B. (2000). Effectiveness of a multi-component treatment for improving mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 15 (1). 40-51.
21. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems. New York: Guilford.
22. Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412-420.
23. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (4). 735-749.
24. Stein, M., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A direct instruction approach (3rd ed.). Columbus: Prentice Hall.
25. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15 (1). 55-64.
26. VanDerHeyden, A., Witt, J. C., & Naquin, G. (2003). Development and validation of a process for screening referrals to special education. School Psychology Review, 32 (2). 204-227.
27. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and the potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3). 137-146.
28. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
29. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33 (3). 223-238.
30. Witt, J. C. (2005). Screening to Enhance Equitable Education. Retrieved May 1st, 2005, from www.joewitt.org/steep.htm.
31. Witt, J. C., Daly, E. J., III, & Noell, G. H. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.