Transforming vision into action

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1567-1587

  Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; Dorsal stream; Grasping; Reaching; Ventral stream; Visuomotor control

Indexed keywords

AGNOSIA; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN CORTEX; COGNITION; EYE MOVEMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LIMB MOVEMENT; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79551557056     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.027     Document Type: Review

References (221)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eyes but not the hand. Current Biology 1995, 5:679-685.
2. Amazeen E.L., DaSilva F. Psychophysical test for the independence of perception and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:170-182.
3. Andersen R.A., Buneo C.A. Sensorimotor integration in posterior parietal cortex. Advances in Neurology 2003, 93:159-177.
4. Arbib M.A., Liaw J.-S. Sensorimotor transformations in the worlds of frogs and robots. Artificial Intelligence 1995, 72:53-79.
5. Baldauf D., Deubel H. Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping. Vision Research 2010, 50:999-1013.
6. Bálint R. Seelenlähmung des 'Schauens', optische Ataxie, räumliche Störung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1909, 25:51-81.
7. Bálint R., Harvey M. Psychic paralysis of gaze, optic ataxia, and spatial disorder of attention. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1995, 12:265-281.
8. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Li F., Whitehead S.D. Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 1992, 337:331-338.
9. Benson D.F., Greenberg J.P. Visual form agnosia: A specific deficit in visual discrimination. Archives of Neurology 1969, 20:82-89.
10. Berman R.A., Wurtz R.H. Functional identification of a pulvinar path from superior colliculus to cortical area MT. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:6342-6354.
11. Biegstraaten M., de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion: Not a change in perceived length. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 176:497-503.
12. Binkofski F., Dohle C., Posse S., Stephan K.M., Hefter H., Seitz R.J., et al. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: A combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 1998, 50:1253-1259.
13. Binsted G., Chua R., Helsen W., Elliott D. Eye-hand coordination in goal-directed aiming. Human Movement Sciences 2001, 20:563-585.
14. Bisley J.W., Goldberg M.E. The role of the parietal cortex in the neural processing of saccadic eye movements. Advances in neurology: The parietal lobe 2003, Vol. 93:141-157. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
15. Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 111:473-476.
16. Brouwer A.M., Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R. Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(18):1-24.
17. Bruno N., Bernardis P., Gentilucci M. Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2008, 32:423-437.
18. Bruno N., Franz V.H. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1421-1433.
19. Buckingham G., Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Living in a material world: How visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:3111-3118.
20. Buxbaum-Conradi H., Ewert J.P. Pretecto-tectal influences - What the toad's pretectum tells its tectum: Antidromic stimulation/recording study. Journal of Comparative Physiology 1995, 176:169-180.
21. Campion J. Apperceptive agnosia: The specification and description of constructs. Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach 1987, 197-232. Erlbaum, London. G.W. Humphreys, M.J. Riddoch (Eds.).
22. Cant J.S., Arnott S.R., Goodale M.A. FMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:391-405.
23. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:713-731.
24. Castiello U. The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63:1014-1025.
25. Castiello U. The neuroscience of grasping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:726-736.
26. Castiello U., Jeannerod M. Measuring time to awareness. Neuroreport 1991, 2:797-800.
27. Cavina-Pratesi C., Goodale M.A., Culham J.C. FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS One 2007, 2:e424.
28. Cavina-Pratesi C., Ietswaart M., Humphreys G.W., Lestou V., Milner A.D. Impaired grasping in a patient with optic ataxia: Primary visuomotor deficit or secondary consequence of misreaching?. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:226-234.
29. Chapman C.S., Goodale M.A. Missing in action: The effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 191:83-97.
30. Chapman C.S., Goodale M.A. Seeing all the obstacles in your way: The effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:363-375.
31. Chieffi S., Gentilucci M. Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research 1993, 94:471-477.
32. Cohen Y.E., Andersen R.A. A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:553-562.
33. Collett T.S., Harkness L.I.K. Depth vision in animals. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, 111-176. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
34. Collett T.S., Udin S.B., Finch D.J. A possible mechanism for binocular depth judgements in anurans. Experimental Brain Research 1987, 66:35-40.
35. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Shulman G.L. Two neural systems for visual orienting and the pathophysiology of unilateral spatial neglect. The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect 2002, 259-273. Oxford University Press, Oxford. H.-O. Karnath, A.D. Milner, G. Vallar (Eds.).
36. Corrette B.J. Prey capture in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis: Coordination of the capture sequence and strike movements. Journal of Experimental Biology 1990, 148:147-180.
37. Cowey A. The blindsight saga. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 200:3-24.
38. Cuijpers R.H., Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 175:32-44.
39. Cuijpers R.H., Smeets J.B., Brenner E. On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 91:2598-2606.
40. Culham J.C. Human brain imaging reveals a parietal area specialized for grasping. Attention and performance XX: Functional brain imaging of human cognition 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (pp. 417-438). N. Kanwisher, J. Duncan (Eds.).
41. Culham J.C., Cavina-Pratesi C., Singhal A. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging?. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2668-2684.
42. Culham J.C., Danckert S.L., DeSouza J.F.X., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Visually-guided grasping produces activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:158-170.
43. Culham J.C., Kanwisher N.G. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001, 11:157-163.
44. Culham J.C., Valyear K.F. Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:205-212.
45. Danckert J., Sharif N., Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., Goodale M.A. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Planning versus on-line control. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 144:275-280.
46. de Grave D.D., Biegstraaten M., Smeets J.B., Brenner E. Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 163:58-64.
47. Daprati E., Gentilucci G. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1577-1582.
48. Dean P., Redgrave P., Westby G.W.M. Event or emergency? Two response systems in the mammalian superior colliculus. Trends in Neurosciences 1989, 12:137-147.
49. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
50. de'Sperati C., Baud-Bovy G. Blind saccades: An asynchrony between seeing and looking. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:4317-4321.
51. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Paprotta I. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:81-107.
52. Dewar M.T., Carey D.P. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: A mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1501-1508.
53. Diedrichsen J., Werner S., Schmidt T., Trommershauser J. Immediate spatial distortions of pointing movements induced by visual landmarks. Perception and Psychophysics 2004, 66:89-103.
54. Dijkerman H.C., Lê S., Démonet J.F., Milner A.D. Visuomotor performance in a patient with visual agnosia due to an early lesion. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 20:12-25.
55. Downing P.E., Chan A.W., Peelen M.V., Dodds C.M., Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16:1453-1461.
56. Dubrowski A., Bock O., Carnahan H., Jungling S. The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 145:365-371.
57. Efron R. What is perception?. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1969, 4:137-173.
58. Ewert J.P. Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey catching in toads. Behavioral Brain Sciences 1987, 10:337-405.
59. Ewert J.P. The release of visual behaviour in toads: Stages of parallel/hierarchical information processing. Visuomotor coordination, amphibians: Comparisons, models, and robots 1989, Plenum, New York, (pp 39-109). J.P. Ewert, M.A. Arbib (Eds.).
60. Ewert J.P., Buxbaum-Conradi H., Dreisvogt F., Glagow M., Merkel-Harff C., Röttgen A., et al. Neural modulation of visuomotor functions underlying prey-catching behaviour in anurans: Perception, attention, motor performance, learning. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A. Molecular Integrative Physiology 2001, 128:417-461.
61. Fattori P., Breveglieri R., Amoroso K., Galletti C. Evidence for both reaching and grasping activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex of the macaque. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 20:2457-2466.
62. Fattori P., Raos V., Breveglieri R., Bosco A., Marzocchi N., Galletti C. The dorsomedial pathway is not just for reaching: Grasping neurons in the medial parieto-occipital cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:342-349.
63. Filimon F., Nelson J.D., Huang R.S., Sereno M.I. Multiple parietal reach regions in humans: Cortical representations for visual and proprioceptive feedback during on-line reaching. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:2961-2971.
64. Fischer M.H. How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects?. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 136:224-230.
65. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:457-459.
66. Franz V.H. Planning versus online control: Dynamic illusion effects in grasping?. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:211-223.
67. Franz V.H., Bulthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: Obstacle avoidance is not the explanation. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 149:470-477.
68. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bulthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 2000, 11:20-25.
69. Frey S.H., Vinton D., Norlund R., Grafton S.T. Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23:397-405.
70. Ganel T., Chajut E., Algom D. Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Current Biology 2008, 18:R599-R601.
71. Ganel T., Goodale M.A. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 2003, 426:664-667.
72. Ganel T., Tanzer M., Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: Opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychological Science 2008, 19:221-225.
73. Gentilucci M., Chieffi S., Daprati E., Saetti M.C., Toni I. Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:369-376.
74. Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Keetch K.M., Lyons J., Amazeen E., Weeks D.J., et al. Perception-action and the Muller-Lyer illusion: Amplitude or endpoint bias?. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 160:71-78.
75. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2004, 27:3-24. [discussion 24-78].
76. Glover S., Dixon P. Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 137:254-258.
77. Glover S., Dixon P. The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 55:96-103.
78. Glover S., Dixon P. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:266-278.
79. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., Whitwell R.L., Morrissey B., Goodale M.A. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:624-631.
80. Goodale M.A. Vision as a sensorimotor system. Behavioral approaches to brain research 1983, 41-61. Oxford University Press, New York. T.E. Robinson (Ed.).
81. Goodale M.A. The cortical organization of visual perception and visuomotor control. An invitation to cognitive science. Vol. 2. Visual cognition and action, 2nd Ed. 1995, 167-214. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Kosslyn, D.N. Oshershon (Eds.).
82. Goodale M.A. Visuomotor modules in the vertebrate brain. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 1996, 74:390-400.
83. Goodale M.A. Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:891-919.
84. Goodale M.A., Haffenden A.M. Interactions between dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing. Advances in neurology: The parietal lobe 2003, Vol. 93:249-267. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
85. Goodale M.A., Humphrey G.K. The objects of action and perception. Cognition 1998, 67:179-205.
86. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1159-1178.
87. Goodale M.A., Meenan J.P., Bülthoff H.H., Nicolle D.A., Murphy K.S., Racicot C.I. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology 1994, 4:604-610.
88. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Fractionating orientation behavior in rodents. The analysis of visual behavior 1982, 267-299. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.M. Mansfield (Eds.).
89. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15:20-25.
90. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
91. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., Jakobson L.S., Carey D.P. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 1991, 349:154-156.
92. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A., Milner A.D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research 2004, 144:131-144.
93. Gordon A.M., Westling G., Cole K.J., Johansson R.S. Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. Journal of Neurophysiology 1993, 69:1789-1796.
94. Gould J.L. Ethology: The mechanisms and evolution of behavior 1982, Norton, New York.
95. Grefkes C., Fink G.R. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. Journal of Anatomy 2005, 207:3-17.
96. Gregory R.L. The intelligent eye 1970, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
97. Grill-Spector K. The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13:159-166.
98. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
99. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe. Neuron 1998, 21:191-202.
100. Grol M.J., Majdandzić J., Stephan K.E., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C., Bekkering H., et al. Parieto-frontal connectivity during visually guided grasping. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:11877-11887.
101. Haffenden A., Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:122-136.
102. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 2001, 11:177-181.
103. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
104. Holmes G. Disturbances of visual orientation. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1918, 2:449-468.
105. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Binocular vision and stereopsis 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
106. Hu Y., Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:856-868.
107. Hu Y., Osu R., Okada M., Goodale M.A., Kawato M. A model of the coupling between grip aperture and hand transport during human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 167:301-304.
108. Ingle D.J. Two visual systems in the frog. Science 1973, 181:1053-1055.
109. Ingle D.J. Functions of subcortical visual systems in vertebrates and the evolution of higher visual mechanisms. Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 2: Evolution of the eye and visual system 1991, 152-164. Macmillan, London. R.L. Gregory, J. Cronly-Dillon (Eds.).
110. Jackson S.R., Jackson G.M., Rosicky J. Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 102:519-530.
111. Jackson S.R., Shaw A. The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:418-423.
112. Jäger R. Separate channels for visuomotor transformation in the pigeon. European Journal of Morphology 1997, 35:277-289.
113. Jakobson L.S., Archibald Y.M., Carey D.P., Goodale M.A. A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:803-809.
114. Jakobson L.S., Goodale M.A. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1991, 86:199-208.
115. James T.W., Culham J., Humphrey G.K., Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: A fMRI study. Brain 2003, 126:2463-2475.
116. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron 2002, 35:793-801.
117. Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. Attention and performance IX 1981, 153-168. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Long, A. Baddeley (Eds.).
118. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 1984, 16:235-254.
119. Jeannerod M. The formation of finger grip during prehension: A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behavioral Brain Research 1986, 19:99-116.
120. Jeannerod M. The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements 1988, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
121. Johansson R., Westling G., Bäckström A., Flanagan J.R. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:6917-6932.
122. Karnath H.O., Perenin M.-T. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: Evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1561-1569.
123. Karnath H.O., Rüter J., Mandler A., Himmelbach M. The anatomy of object recognition - Visual form agnosia caused by medial occipitotemporal stroke. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:5854-5862.
124. Keefe B.D., Watt S.J. The role of binocular vision in grasping: A small stimulus-set distorts results. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 194:435-444.
125. Knill D.C. Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. Journal of Vision 2005, 5(16):103-115.
126. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293:1506-1509.
127. Kral K., Vernik M., Devetak D. The visually controlled prey-capture behaviour of the European mantispid Mantispa styriaca. Journal of Experimental Biology 2000, 203:2117-2123.
128. Kwok R.M., Braddick O.J. When does the Titchener circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:932-940.
129. Lamme V.A.F. Blindsight: The role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections. Acta Psychologica 2001, 107:209-228.
130. Lamme V.A.F., Roelfsema P.R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences 2000, 23:571-579.
131. Lê S., Cardebat D., Boulanouar K., Hénaff M.A., Michel F., Milner D., et al. Seeing, since childhood, without ventral stream: A behavioural study. Brain 2002, 125:58-74.
132. Lee Y.L., Crabtree C.E., Norman J.F., Bingham G.P. Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online. Perception and Psychophysics 2008, 70:1032-1046.
133. Loftus A., Servos P., Goodale M.A., Mendarozqueta N., Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: Monocular viewing and end-point variance. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 158:317-327.
134. Louw S., Smeets J.B., Brenner E. Judging surface slant for placing objects: A role for motion parallax. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:149-158.
135. Lyon D.C., Nassi J.J., Callaway E.M. A disynaptic relay from superior colliculus to dorsal stream visual cortex in macaque monkey. Neuron 2010, 65:270-279.
136. Marotta J.J., Behrmann M., Goodale M.A. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 116:113-121.
137. Marotta J.J., Goodale M.A. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 121:465-470.
138. Marotta J.J., Goodale M.A. The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13:8-17.
139. Marotta J.J., Kruyer A., Goodale M.A. The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 120:134-138.
140. Marotta J.J., Perrot T.S., Nicolle D., Goodale M.A. The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation. Eye 1995, 9(3):333-336.
141. Marotta J.J., Perrot T.S., Servos P., Nicolle D., Goodale M.A. Adapting to monocular vision: Grasping with one eye. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 104:107-114.
142. Marr, D. (1975). Analysing natural images: A computational theory of texture vision. M.I.T. AI Memo, 33, 4, 1975.
143. Marr D. Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 1976, 275:483-519.
144. McConville J., Laming P.R. DC electrical stimulation of the pretectal thalamus and its effects on the feeding behavior of the toad (Bufo bufo). Developmental Neurobiology 2007, 67:875-883.
145. Melmoth D.R., Finlay A.L., Morgan M.J., Grant S. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2009, 50:3711-3720.
146. Melmoth D.R., Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 171:371-388.
147. Melmoth D.R., Storoni M., Todd G., Finlay A.L., Grant S. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:283-298.
148. Menon R.S., Ogawa S., Kim S.G., Ellermann J.M., Merkle H., Tank D.W., et al. Functional brain mapping using magnetic resonance imaging. Signal changes accompanying visual stimulation. Investigative Radiology 1992, 2(Suppl.):S47-S53.
149. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Visual pathways to perception and action. Progress in brain research 1993, Vol. 95:317-337. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
150. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
151. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
152. Milner A.D., Perrett D.I., Johnston R.S., Benson P.J., Jordan T.R., Heeley D.W., et al. Perception and action in "visual form agnosia" Brain 1991, 114:405-428.
153. Monaco S., Sedda A., Fattori P., Galletti C., Culham J.C. Functional magnetic resonance adaptation (fMRA) reveals the involvement of the dorsomedial stream in wrist orientation for grasping. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 2009, 307:1.
154. Mon-Williams M., Dijkerman H.C. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 128:578-582.
155. Mon-Williams M., McIntosh R.D. A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:268-273.
156. Mon-Williams M., Tresilian J.R. A simple rule of thumb for elegant prehension. Current Biology 2001, 11:1058-1061.
157. Moore T. The neurobiology of visual attention: Finding sources. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16:159-165.
158. Mountcastle V.B., Lynch J.C., Georgopoulos A., Sakata H., Acuña C. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology 1975, 38:871-908.
159. Nieder A., Dehaene S. Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2009, 32:185-208.
160. Obhi S.S., Goodale M.A. The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 167:335-344.
161. Ogawa S., Tank D.W., Menon R., Ellermann J.M., Kim S.G., Merkle H., et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: Functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1992, 89:5951-5955.
162. Op de Beeck H.P., Haushofer J., Kanwisher N.G. Interpreting fMRI data: Maps, modules and dimensions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:123-135.
163. Patla A.E. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait and Posture 1997, 5:54-69.
164. Patla A., Goodale M.A. Visuomotor transformation required for obstacle avoidance during locomotion is unaffected in a patient with visual form agnosia. NeuroReport 1997, 8:165-168.
165. Perenin M.-T., Rossetti Y. Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field. Neuroreport 1996, 7:793-797.
166. Perenin M.-T., Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: A specific disorder in visuomotor coordination. Spatially oriented behavior 1983, 305-326. Springer-Verlag, New York. A. Hein, M. Jeannerod (Eds.).
167. Perenin M.-T., Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 1988, 111:643-674.
168. Pierrot-Deseilligny C.H., Milea D., Muri R.M. Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Current Opinion in Neurology 2004, 17:17-25.
169. Plodowski A., Jackson S.R. Vision: Getting to grips with the Ebbinghaus illusion. Current Biology 2001, 11:R304-R306.
170. Pohl W. Dissociation of spatial discrimination deficits following frontal and parietal lesions in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1973, 82:227-239.
171. Pook P.K., Ballard D.H. Deictic human/robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 1996, 18:259-269.
172. Prado J., Clavagnier S., Otzenberger H., Scheiber C., Perenin M.-T. Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron 2005, 48:849-858.
173. Ramon y Cajal S. Advice for a young investigator 1897, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, [Translated by N. Swanson and L.W. Swanson (1999)].
174. Ratcliff G., Davies-Jones G.A.B. Defective visual localization in focal brain wounds. Brain 1972, 95:49-60.
175. Rice N.J., McIntosh R.D., Schindler I., Mon-Williams M., Démonet J.F., Milner A.D. Intact automatic avoidance of obstacles in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 174:176-188.
176. Riddoch G. Visual disorientation in homonymous half-fields. Brain 1935, 58:376-382.
177. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. Spatial attention: Mechanisms and theories. Advances in psychological science: Vol. 2. Biological and cognitive aspects 1998, 171-198. Psychology Press, East Sussex, England. M. Sabourin, F. Craik, M. Robert (Eds.).
178. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltá C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
179. Rondot P., de Recondo J., Ribadeau Dumas J.L. Visuomotor ataxia. Brain 1977, 100:55-376.
180. Sakata H. The role of the parietal cortex in grasping. Advances in Neurology 2003, 93:121-139.
181. Saltzman H., Zacharatos M., Gruberg E.R. Recognition of apertures in overhead transparent barriers by leopard frogs. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 2004, 64:11-18.
182. Sanders M.D., Warrington E.K., Marshall J., Weiskrantz L. "Blindsight": Vision in a field defect. Lancet 1974, 20:707-708.
183. Schenk T., Milner A.D. Concurrent visuomotor behaviour improves form discrimination in a patient with visual form agnosia. European Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 24:1495-1503.
184. Schindler I., Rice N.J., McIntosh R.D., Rossetti Y., Vighetto A., Milner A.D. Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: Evidence from optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:779-784.
185. Schmid, M. C., Mrowka, S. W., Turchi, J., Saunders, R. C., Wilke, M., Peters, A. J., et al. (2010). Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature (June 23) [E-published ahead of print].
186. Servos P., Carnahan H., Fedwick J. The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000, 32:400-404.
187. Servos P., Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research 1992, 32:1513-1521.
188. Sincich L.C., Park K.F., Wohlgemuth M.J., Horton J.C. Bypassing V1: A direct geniculate input to area MT. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 7:1123-1128.
189. Smeets J.B., Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 1999, 3:237-271.
190. Smeets J.B., Brenner E. Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 139:92-100.
191. Smeets J.B., Brenner E. Grasping Weber's law. Current Biology 2008, 18:R1089-R1090.
192. Stöttinger E., Perner J. Dissociating size representation for action and for conscious judgment: Grasping visual illusions without apparent obstacles. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:269-284.
193. Stöttinger E., Soder K., Pfusterschmied J., Wagner H., Perner J. Division of labour within the visual system: Fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:79-88.
194. Striemer C., Chapman C.S., Goodale M.A. "Real-time" obstacle avoidance in the absence of primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009, 106:15996-16001.
195. Tanaka K. Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: Clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13:90-99.
196. Thaler L., Goodale M.A. Beyond distance and direction: The brain represents target locations non-metrically. Journal of Vision 2010, 10:3.1-27.
197. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Jackson S.R. Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition 1997, 4:1-38.
198. Tootell R.B.H., Tsao D., Vanduffel W. Neuroimaging weighs in: Humans meet macaques in "primate" visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:3981-3989.
199. Tresilian J.R. Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 120:352-368.
200. Ungerleider L.G., Brody B.A. Extrapersonal spatial orientation: The role of posterior parietal, anterior frontal, and inferotemporal cortex. Experimental Neurology 1977, 56:265-280.
201. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
202. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C. Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:970-984.
203. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C., Sharif N., Westwood D., Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:218-228.
204. van Bergen E., van Swieten L.M., Williams J.H., Mon-Williams M. The effect of orientation on prehension movement time. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 178:180-193.
205. van de Kamp C., Zaal F.T.J.M. Prehension is really reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:27-34.
206. van Donkelaar P. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 125:517-520.
207. Van Essen D.C., Lewis J.W., Drury H.A., Hadjikhani N., Tootell R.B., Bakircioglu M., et al. Mapping visual cortex in monkeys and humans using surface-based atlases. Vision Research 2001, 41:1359-1378.
208. van Mierlo C.M., Louw S., Smeets J.B., Brenner E. Slant cues are processed with different latencies for the online control of movement. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(25):1-8.
209. Vaughan J., Rosenbaum D.A., Meulenbroek R.G. Planning reaching and grasping movements: The problem of obstacle avoidance. Motor Control 2001, 5:116-135.
210. Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C., Grol M.J., Toni I. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:4726-4735.
211. Vilaplana, J. M., Batlle, J. F., & Coronado, J. L. (2004). A neural model of hand grip formation during reach to grasp. In 2004 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (Vols. 1-7, pp. 542-546).
212. Vishton P.M., Fabre E. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: One- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:377-392.
213. Warner C.E., Goldshmit Y., Bourne J.A. Retinal afferents synapse with relay cells targeting the middle temporal area in the pulvinar and lateral geniculate nuclei. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 2010, 4:8.
214. Warren W.H., Fajen B.R. From optic flow to laws of control. Optic flow and beyond 2004, 307-337. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. L.M. Vaina, S.A. Beardsley, S.K. Rushton (Eds.).
215. Watt S.J., Bradshaw M.F. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1473-1481.
216. Watt S.J., Bradshaw M.F. The visual control of reaching and grasping: Binocular disparity and motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:404-415.
217. Weiskrantz L. Consciousness lost and found. A neuropsychological exploration 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
218. Weiskrantz L., Warrington E.K., Sanders M.D., Marshall J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 1974, 97:709-728.
219. Weitzenfeld A., Arbib M., Alexander A. The neural simulation language: A system for brain modeling 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.
220. Westwood D.A., Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:243-254.
221. Westwood D.A., Heath M., Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:456-463.