Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action

Psychological Science

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 20-25

  Franz, Volker H ^a   Gegenfurtner, K R ^a   Bulthoff H H ^a   Fahle, M ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033760864     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00209     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J.F.X., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J.B.J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
3. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
4. Coren, S., & Girgus, J.S. (1972). A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 4, 240-244.
5. Coren, S., & Girgus, J.S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Coren, S., & Miller, J. (1974). Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 355-357.
7. Daprati, E., & Gentilucci, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
8. Goodale, M.A., Meenan, J.P., Bülthoff, H.H., Nicolle, D.A., Murphy, K.J., & Carolynn, I.R. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604-610.
9. Goodale, M.A., & Milner, A.D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 97-112.
10. Goodale, M.A., Milner, A.D., Jakobson, L.S., & Carey, D.P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
11. Goodale, M.A., Pélisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
12. Haffenden, A.M., & Goodale, M.A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
13. Hansen, R.M., & Skavenski, A.A. (1985). Accuracy of spatial localization near the time of a saccadic eye movement. Vision Research, 25, 1077-1082.
14. Jackson, S.R., & Husain, M. (1997). Visual control of hand action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 310-317.
15. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 153-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
17. Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
19. Post, R.B., & Welch, R.B. (1996). Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Perception, 25, 569-581.
20. Pressey, A.W. (1977). Measuring the Titchener circles and Delboeuf illusions with the method of adjustment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 118-120.
21. Ungerleider, L.G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, & R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.