How sensitive is hand transport to illusory context effects?

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 224-230

  Fischer, M H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fitts' law; Motor control; Pointing; Size contrast; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; PERCEPTION;

ADULT; BRAIN; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034939875     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002210000571     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand
2. Separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior
3. Manual asymmetries in response to rapid target movement
4. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality
5. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions
6. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements
7. Attention allocation during manual movement preparation and execution
8. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement
9. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action
10. Visual illusion and action
11. Perception and action in the human visual system
12. The objects of action and perception
13. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception
14. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action
15. Hand, space, and attentional asymmetries in goal-directed manual aiming
16. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping
17. Contour lightness and separation effects in the Ebbinghaus illusion
18. Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture?
19. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?
20. Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects