Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 423-437

  Bruno, Nicola ^a   Bernardis, Paolo ^b   Gentilucci, Maurizio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action; Dorsal stream; M ller Lyer illusion; Perception; Perception action dissociations; Pointing; Ventral stream

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; DEVICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MONITOR; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ATTENTION; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 38649083396     PISSN: 01497634     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Adams J.A. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 3 (1971) 111-149
2. Aron A., and Aron E. Statistics for Psychology (1994), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
3. Bernardis P., Knox P.C., and Bruno N. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research 162 (2005) 133-144
4. Binsted G., and Elliott D. Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements. Experimental Brain Research 127 2 (1999) 193
5. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 385-388
6. Bruno N., and Bernardis P. When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses. Experimental Brain Research 151 2 (2003) 225-237
7. Carey D.P. Do action systems resist visual illusions?. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 109-113
8. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (1988), Erlsbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
9. de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 155 1 (2004) 56-62
10. de Grave D.D.J., Franz V.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. The influence of the Brentano illusion on eye and hand movements. Journal of Vision 6 7 (2006) 727-738. http://journalofvision.org/6/7/5/ 10.1167/6.7.5
11. Elliott D., and Lee T.D. The role of target information on manual-aiming bias. Psychological Research 58 1 (1995) 2
12. Eysenk H.J., and Slater P. Effects of practice and rest on fluctuations in the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology 49 (1958) 246-256
13. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 5 11 (2001) 457-459
14. Franz V.H., Fahle M., Bulthoff H.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 5 (2001) 1124-1144
15. Gentilucci M., Chieffi S., Daprati E., Saetti M.C., and Toni I. Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34 5 (1996) 369-376
16. Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gangitano M., and Toni I. Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements. Neuroscience Letters 222 2 (1997) 123-126
17. Gentilucci M., Negrotti A., and Gangitano M. Planning an action. Experimental Brain Research 115 (1997) 116-128
18. Gentilucci M., Benuzzi F., Bertolani L., and Gangitano M. Visual illusions and the control of children arm movements. Neuropsychologia 39 2 (2001) 132-139
19. Giovannini L., Grana A., Jacomuzzi A., Marando R., Semenza C., Surian L., et al. Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action in typical development, autism, and Parkinson's disease. Cognitive Processing 7 Suppl. 5 (2006) 40-43
20. Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Keetch K.M., Lyons J., Amazeen E., Weeks D.J., et al. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude and endpoint bias?. Experimental Brain Research 160 1 (2005) 71-78
21. Glover S. Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 7 (2002) 288-292
22. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 27 1 (2004) 3-24
23. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., Whitwell R.L., Morrissey B., and Goodale M.A. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 6 6 (2006) 399a. http://journalofvision.org/6/6/399/ 10.1167/6.6.399
24. Goodale M.A., and Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14 2 (2004) 203-211
25. Hay L., and Redon C. Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements. Neuroscience Letters 408 3 (2006) 194-198
26. Heath M., Rival C., and Neely K. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures. Experimental Brain Research 168 3 (2006) 348-356
27. Hu Y., and Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 5 (2000) 856-868
28. Jacob P., and Jeannerod M. Ways of Seeing. The Scope and the Limits of Visual Cognition (2003), University Press, Oxford
29. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral Brain Science 17 (1994) 187-245
30. Jeannerod M., and Jacob P. Visual cognition. A new look at the two visual systems model. Neuropsychologia 43 (2005) 301-312
31. Judd C.H. Practice and its effects on the perception of illusions. Psychological Review 9 (1902) 27-39
32. Knox P., and Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Experimental Brain Research (2007)
33. Köhler W., and Fishback J. The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1950) 267-281
34. Lavrysen A., Helsen W.F., Elliott D., Buekers M.J., Feys P., and Heremans E. The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research 174 3 (2006) 544-554
35. Lewis E.O. The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology 2 (1908) 294-307
36. Mack A., Heuer F., Villardi K., and Chambers D. The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures. Perception and Psychophysics 37 4 (1985) 335-344
37. Meegan D.V., Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Tremblay L., Welsh T.N., and Elliott D. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research 155 1 (2004) 37-47
38. Mendoza J., Hansen S., Glazebrook C.M., Keetch K.M., and Elliott D. Visual illusion affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action. Human Movement Science 24 5-6 (2005) 760-773
39. Milner A.D., and Dyde R. Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't?. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7 1 (2003) 10-11
40. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action (1995), University Press, Oxford
41. Mon-Williams M., and Bull R. The Judd illusion: evidence for two visual streams or two experimental condition?. Experimental Brain Research 130 2 (2000) 273-276
42. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., and Farne A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 95-101
43. Perenin M., and Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111 (1988) 643-674
44. Porac C. Decrement and the illusions of the Müller-Lyer figure. Perceptual and Motar Skills 79 2 (1994) 707-717
45. Post R.B., and Welch R.B. Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?. Perception 25 5 (1996) 569-581
46. Predebon J. Decrement of the Brentano Müller-Lyer illusion as a function of inspection time. Perception 27 2 (1998) 183-192
47. Predebon J. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information. Experimental Brain Research 163 1 (2005) 100-108
48. Predebon J. Decrement of the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions: the effects of inspection and practice. Psychological Research 70 5 (2006) 384-394
49. Radoeva P.D., Cohen J.D., Corballis P.M., Lukovits T.G., and Koleva S.G. Hemispheric asymmetry in a dissociation between the visuomotor and visuoperceptual streams. Neuropsychologia 43 12 (2005) 1763-1773
50. Rival C., Olivier I., Ceyte H., and Ferrel C. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research 153 3 (2003) 378-381
51. Rival C., Olivier I., Ceyte H., and Bard C. Age-related differences in the visual processes implied in perception and action: distance and location parameters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 87 2 (2004) 107
52. Rizzolatti G., and Craighero L. Spatial attention: mechanisms and theories. In: Sabourin M., Craig F., and Rober M. (Eds). Advances in Psychological Sciences. vol. 2: Biological and Cognitive Aspects (1998), Psychological Press, Hove, UK 171-198
53. Rizzolatti G., and Gallese V. Do perception and action result from different brain circuits? The three visual systems hypothesis. In: van Hemmen J.L., and Sejonvsky T.J. (Eds). 23 Problems in Systems Neuroscience (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford 367-393
54. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 153 2 (2003) 146-157
55. Schiano D.J., and Jordan K. Müller-Lyer decrement: practice or prolonged inspection?. Perception 19 3 (1990) 307-316
56. Schenk T. An allocentric rather perceptual deficit in patients D.F. Nature Neuroscience 9 11 (2006) 1369-1370
57. Serrien D.J., Ivry R.B., and Swinnen S.P. Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7 2 (2006) 160-166
58. Smeets J.B., Brenner E., de Grave D.D., and Cuijpers R.H. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Experimental Brain Research 147 2 (2002) 135-144
59. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. Ten years of illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1501-1504
60. van Doorn H., van der Kamp J., and Savelsbergh G.J. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia 45 8 (2007) 1939-1947
61. Vishton P.M., Rea J.G., Cutting J.E., and Nunez L.N. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative vs. absolute, not perception vs. action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1659-1672
62. Welch R.B., Post R.B., Lum W., and Prinzmetal W. The relationship between perceived length and egocentric location in Müller-Lyer figures with one versus two chevrons. Perception and Psychophysics 66 7 (2004) 1095-1104
63. Westwood D.A., and Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision 16 3-4 (2003) 243-254
64. Westwood D.A., Heath M., and Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 134 4 (2000) 456-463
65. Westwood D.A., McEachern T., and Roy E.A. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research 141 2 (2001) 166-173
66. Wraga M., Creem S.H., and Proffitt D.R. Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 239-243