Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 3711-3720

  Melmoth, Dean R ^a   Finlay, Alison L ^a   Morgan, Michael J ^a   Grant, Simon ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ANISOMETROPIA; ASSOCIATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HAND STRENGTH; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STRABISMUS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANISOMETROPIA; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STRABISMUS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68349097425     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3229     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Wheatstone C. Contributions to the physiology of vision: on some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond. 1838:8;371-394.
2. von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990.
3. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995.
4. Parker AJ. Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex. Nature Rev Neurosci. 2007:8;379-391.
5. Fielder AR, Moseley MJ. Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye. 1996;10:233-238.
6. Morgan MJ. Vision of solid objects. Nature. 1989;339:101-103.
7. Sakata H, Taira M, Kusunoki A, Murata A, Tanaka Y. The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends Neurosci. 1997:20;350-357.
8. Castiello U, Begliomini C. The control of visually guided grasping. Neuroscientist. 2008;14:157-170.
9. Dijkerman HC, Milner AD, Carey DP. The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane. I. Effects of visual form agnosia. Exp Brain Res. 1996;112:442-451.
10. Marotta JJ, Behrmann M, Goodale MA. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Exp Brain Res. 1997:116;113-121.
11. Verhagan L, Dijkerman HC, Grol MJ, Toni I. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. J Neurosci. 2008;28: 4726-4735.
12. Preston TJ, Li S, Kourtzi Z, Welchman AE. Multivoxal pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11315-11327.
13. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res. 1992:32;1513-1521.
14. Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman HC. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999:128;578-582.
15. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologica. 2000:38;1473-1481.
16. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res. 2004:158; 317-327.
17. Melmoth DR, Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2006:171; 371-388.
18. Bingham GP, Bradley A, Bailey M, Vinner R. Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27:1314-1334.
19. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF. The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003;29:404-415.
20. Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM, Watt SJ, Hibbard PB, Davies IR, Simpson PJ. Binocular cues and the control of prehension. Spatial Vis. 2004;17:95-110.
21. Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S. Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:283-298.
22. Daw NW. Critical periods and amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:502-505.
23. Kiorpes L, McKee SP. Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:480-486.
24. Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ, Finlay AL. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007:48;1139-1148.
25. Marotta JJ, Goodale MA. The role of familiar size in the control of grasping. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000:13;8-17.
26. Knill DC, Kersten D. Visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about surface orientation. J Neurophysiol. 2004:91;1350-1366.
27. Gardner PL, Mon-Williams M. Vertical gaze angle: absolute heightin- scene information for the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 2001:136;379-3785.
28. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologica. 1971:9;97-112.
29. Hall C. The relationship between clinical stereotests. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1982:90;91-95.
30. Fawcett SL, Birch EE. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders. JAAPOS. 2003:7;333-338.
31. Lang J. Anomalous retinal correspondence update. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988:226;137-140.
32. Davis AR, Sloper JJ, Neveu MM, Hogg CR, Morgan MJ, Holder GE. Electrophysiological and psychophysical differences between early-and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003:44;610-617.
33. Rabbetts RB. Bennett & Rabbett's Clinical Visual Optics. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1998.
34. Rogers BJ, Cagenello R. Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature. 1989;339:135-137.
35. Johnston EB. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Res. 1991;31:1351-1360.
36. Jones RK, Lee DN. Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981;7:30-40.
37. Thompson AM, Nawrot M. Abnormal depth perception from motion parallax in amblyopic observers. Vision Res. 1999;39:1407-1413.
38. Nawrot M, Frankl M, Joyce L. Concordant eye movement and motion parallax asymmetries in esotropia. Vision Res. 2008;48: 799-808.
39. Schlicht EJ, Schrater PR. Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182:47-57.
40. Morgan MJ, Castet E. Stereoscopic depth perception at high velocities. Nature. 1995;378:380-383.
41. Greenwald HS, Knill DC, Saunders JA. Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time. Vision Res. 2005:45;1975-1989.
42. Johansson RS, Westling G. Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988:71; 59-71.
43. Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Martenuik RG, Cargoe SL, Frazer MB. The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension. J Motor Behav. 1991;23:192-204.
44. Wing AM, Fraser C. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol. 1983;35A:297-309.
45. Melmoth DR, Grant S. Vision of the thumb as the guide to prehension. Percept Suppl. 2005;34:243.
46. Lenoir M, Musch E, La Grange N. Ecological relevance of stereopsis in one-handed ball-catching. Percept Motor Skills. 1999:89;495-508.
47. Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Savelsbergh GJ. The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157: 383-390.