When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion?. A quantitative review

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1421-1433

  Bruno, Nicola ^a   Franz, Volker H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action; Grasping; Meta analysis; M ller Lyer illusion; Perception

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPLIT-BRAIN PROCEDURE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 63049090621     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 6 (1995) 679-685
2. Aron A., and Aron E. Statistics for psychology (1994), Prentice Hall
3. Bernardis P., Knox P.C., and Bruno N. How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research 162 (2005) 133-144
4. Biegstraaten M., de Grave D.D., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length. Experimental Brain Research 176 3 (2007) 497-503
5. Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 385-388
6. Bruno N., and Bernardis P. When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses. Experimental Brain Research 151 2 (2003) 225-237
7. Bruno N., Bernardis P., and Gentilucci M. Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32 3 (2008) 423-437
8. Carey D.P. Do action systems resist visual illusions?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 109-113
9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
10. Daprati E., and Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia 35 12 (1997) 1577-1582
11. Dewar M.T., and Carey D.P. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation. Neuropsychologia 44 8 (2006) 1501-1508
12. de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 155 1 (2004) 56-62
13. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 20-25
14. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 11 (2001) 457-459
15. Franz V.H., Fahle M., Bülthoff H.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 5 (2001) 1124-1144
16. Franz V.H. Manual size estimation: A neuropsychological measure of perception?. Experimental Brain Research 151 4 (2003) 471-477
17. Franz V.H., Scharnowski F., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant, not dynamic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 6 (2005) 1359-1378
18. Franz V.H., Hesse C., and Kollath S. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia 47 (2009) 1532-1545
19. Franz V.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 (2008) 920-950
20. Glover S. Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 7 (2002) 288-292
21. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 27 1 (2004) 3-24
22. Glover S., and Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 560-572
23. Glover S., and Dixon P. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus Illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception and Psychophysics 64 2 (2002) 266-278
24. Gonzalez C.L.R., Ganel T., Whitwell R.L., Morrissey B., and Goodale M.A. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia 46 (2008) 624-631
25. Goodale M.A. Action without perception in human vision. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 (2008) 891-919
26. Goodale M.A., and Milner A.D. Sight unseen (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
27. Goodale M.A., and Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14 2 (2004) 203-211
28. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A., and Milner A.D. Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research 144 (2004) 131-144
29. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1 (1998) 122-136
30. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., and Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 11 3 (2001) 177-181
31. Hay L., and Redon C. Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements. Neuroscience Letters 408 3 (2006) 194-198
32. Heath M., and Rival C. Role of the visuomotor system in on-line attenuation of a premovement illusory bias in grip aperture. Brain and Cognition 57 2 (2005) 111-114
33. Heath M., Rival C., and Binsted G. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Experimental Brain Research 158 3 (2004) 378-384
34. Heath M., Rival C., and Neely K. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures. Experimental Brain Research 168 3 (2006) 348-356
35. Heath M., Rival C., Neely K., and Krigolson O. Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research 169 4 (2006) 473-481
36. Heath M., Rival C., Westwood D.A., and Neely K. Time course analysis of closed- and open-loop grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Journal of Motor Behavior 37 3 (2005) 179-185
37. Hu Y., and Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size? Scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 5 (2000) 856-868
38. Hunter J.E., and Schmidt F.L. Methods of meta-analysis (2004), Sage
39. Jacob P., and Jeannerod M. Ways of seeing (2003), Oxford University press, Oxford, UK
40. Judd C.H. Practice and its effects on the perception of illusions. Psychological Review 9 (1902) 27-39
41. Knox P.C., and Bruno N. When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Müller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Experimental Brain Research 181 2 (2007) 277-287
42. Köhler W., and Fishback J. The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: An examination of two theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1950) 267-281
43. Lewis E.O. The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology 2 (1908) 294-307
44. Meegan D.V., Glazebrook C.M., Dhillon V.P., Tremblay L., Welsh T.N., and Elliott D. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research 155 (2004) 37-47
45. Milner A.D. Vision without knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 352 1358 (1997) 1249-1256
46. Milner A.D., and Dyde R. Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 1 (2003) 10-11
47. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University press, Oxford, UK
48. Norman J. Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2002) 73-144
49. Otto-de Haart E.G., Carey D.P., and Milne A.B. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologia 37 13 (1999) 1437-1444
50. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., and Farne A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 95-101
51. Post R.B., and Welch R.B. Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions?. Perception 25 5 (1996) 569-581
52. Predebon J. Decrement of the Müller-Lyer and Poggendorff illusions: The effects of inspection and practice. Psychological Research 70 5 (2006) 384-394
53. Pressey A.W., Di Lollo V., and Tait R.W. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception 6 4. (1977) 435-439
54. Pressey A., and Martin N.S. The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions. Psychological Research 52 1 (1990) 46-53
55. Radoeva P.D., Cohen J.D., Corballis P.M., Lukovits T.G., and Koleva S.G. Hemispheric asymmetry in a dissociation between the visuomotor and visuoperceptual streams. Neuropsychologia 43 12 (2005) 1763-1773
56. Rizzolatti G., and Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research 153 2 (2003) 146-157
57. Rizzolatti G., and Gallese V. Do perception and action result from different brain circuits? The three visual systems hypothesis. In: van Hemmen J.L., and Sejonvsky T.J. (Eds). 23 Problems in systems neuroscience (2006), Oxford university press 367-393
58. Rosenbaum D.A. Human motor control (1991), Academic press
59. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Rev. ed. Sage Publications. Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 6.
60. Rossetti Y., Pisella L., and Vighetto A. Optic ataxia revisited: visually guided action versus immediate visuomotor control. Experimental Brain Research 153 2 (2003) 171-179
61. Smeets J.B., and Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3 3 (1999) 237-271
62. Trevarthen C.B. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung 31 (1968) 229-337
63. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J.W. (Eds). Analysis of visual behavior (1982), MIT press, Cambridge, MA 549-586
64. van Doorn H., van der Kamp J., and Savelsbergh G.J. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: The contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia 45 8 (2007) 1939-1947
65. Weiskranz L. Blindsight: a case study and implications (1986), Oxford University press, Oxford, UK
66. Westwood D.A., Chapman C.D., and Roy E.A. Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Experimental Brain Research 130 4 (2000) 545-548
67. Westwood D.A., Heath M., and Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 134 4 (2000) 456-463
68. Westwood D.A., McEachern T., and Roy E.A. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure. Experimental Brain Research 141 2 (2001) 166-173
69. Woodworth R. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monograph 3 2 (1899) 1-114