Dissociating size representation for action and for conscious judgment: Grasping visual illusions without apparent obstacles

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 269-284

  Stöttinger, Elisabeth ^a   Perner, Josef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Conscious perception; Implicit knowledge; Knowledge for action; Obstacles avoidance; Perceptual judgement; Visual illusions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PERCEPTION; THUMB; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; SIZE PERCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33646557648     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 6 (1995) 679-685
2. Bridgeman B., Gemmer A., Forsman T., and Huemer V. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research 40 (2000) 3539-3552
3. Bridgeman B., Kirch M., and Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics 29 (1981) 336-342
4. Bridgeman B., Peery S., and Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics 59 3 (1997) 456-469
5. Daprati E., and Gentilucci M. Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologica 35 (1997) 1577-1582
6. Franz V.H., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasp effects of the Ebbinhaus illusion: Obstacle avoidance is not the explanation. Experimental brain research 149 (2003) 470-477
7. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 20-25
8. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 457-459
9. Franz V.H., Fahle M., Bülthoff H.H., and Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1124-1144
10. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., and Keillor J.M. Difference in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologica 32 (1994) 1159-1178
11. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on perception and prehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1998) 122-136
12. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1597-1607
13. Haffenden A.M., Schiff K.C., and Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 11 (2001) 177-181
14. Jackson S.R., and Shaw A. The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 26 (2000) 418-423
15. Jacob P., and Jeannerod M. Ways of seeing. The scope and limits of visual cognition (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Kwok R.M., and Braddick O.J. When does Tichener circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologica 41 (2003) 932-940
17. Millner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. Marcel A.J. Slippage in the unity of consciousness. In: Bock G.R., and Marsh J. (Eds). Experimental and theoretical studies of consciousness (1993), Wiley, Chichester 168-186
19. Otto-de Haart E.G., Carey D.P., and Milne A.B. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologica 37 (1999) 1437-1444
20. Paulignan Y., MacKenzie C., Marteniuk R., and Jeannerod M. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. Experimental Brain Research 83 (1991) 502-512
21. Pavani F., Boscagli I., Benvenuti F., Rabuffetti M., and Farnè A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 95-101
22. Perenin M.T., and Rossetti Y. Grasping without form discrimination in an hemianopic field. NeuroReport 7 (1996) 793-797
23. Pöppel E., Held R., and Frost D. Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature 243 (1973) 295-296
24. Steingrüber, H.J., & Lienert, G.A. (1976). Hand-dominanz-test (HDT). Hogrefe, Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich, 1976.
25. Smeets J.B.J., and Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3 (1999) 237-271
26. Vishton P.M., Rea J.G., Cutting J.E., and Nuñez L.N. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1659-1672
27. Weiskrantz L., Sanders M.D., and Marshall J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 97 (1974) 709-728
28. Weiskrantz L. Blindsight: A case study and implications (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
29. Westwood D.A., and Dubrowski A. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects. Experimental brain research 135 (2000) 535-543
30. Wong E., and Mack A. Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica 48 (1981) 123-131