The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1014-1025

  Castiello, Umberto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0035431490     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194520     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BONFIGLIOLI, C., & CASTIELLO, U. (1998). Dissociation of covert and overt spatial attention during prehension movements: Selective interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1426-1440.
2. CARNAHAN, H., GOODALE, M., & MARTENIUK, R. (1993). Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback. Human Movement Science, 12, 219-234.
3. CASTIELLO, U. (1996). Grasping a fruit: Selection for action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 582-603.
4. CASTIELLO, U. (1999). Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 264-271.
5. CHIEFFI, S., GENTILUCCI, M., ALLPORT, A., SASSO, E., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1993). Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Brain, 116, 1119-1137.
6. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
7. EDWARDS, M., & HUMPHREYS, G. (1999). Pointing and grasping in unilateral visual neglect: Effect of on-line visual feedback in grasping. Neuropsychologia, 37, 959-973.
8. EFRON, R. (1969). What is perception? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 4, 137-173.
9. ERIKSEN, C. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigation of a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118.
10. FARAH, M. (1990). Visual agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. GENTILUCCI, M., CASTIELLO, U., CORRADINI, M. L., SCARPA, M., UMILTÀ, C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1991). Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movement. Neuropsychologia, 29, 361-378.
12. GIBSON, B. (1996a). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1514-1520.
13. GIBSON, B. (1996b). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1496-1504.
14. GOLDBERG, M. E., & SEGRAVES, M. A. (1987). Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 25, 107-118.
15. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
16. HOFF, B., & ARBIB, M. A. (1993). Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach to grasp. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 175-192.
17. HOWARD, L. A., & TIPPER, S. P. (1997). Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 113, 144-152.
18. HUMPHREY, G., GOODALE, M., JAKOBSON, L., & SERVOS, P. (1994). The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form of agnosic and normal subjects. Perception, 23, 225-238.
19. JACKSON, S. R., JACKSON, G. M., & ROSICKY, J. (1995). Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Experimental Brain Research, 102, 519-530.
20. JAKOBSON, L. S., & GOODALE, M. A. (1992). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
21. JEANNEROD, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 153-169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
23. KLATZKY, R. L., MCCLOSKEY, B., DOHERTY, S., PELLEGRINO, J., & SMITH, T. (1987). Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 19, 187-213.
24. KRITIKOS, A., BENNETT, K. M. B., DUNAI, J., & CASTIELLO, U. (2000). Interference from distracters in reach to grasp movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 131-151.
25. LHERMITTE, F. (1983). "Utilization behavior" and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237-255.
26. MACKENZIE, C. L., MARTENIUK, R. G., DUGAS, C., LISKE, D., & EICKMEIER, B. (1987). Three-dimensional movement trajectories in a Fitts' task: Implications for control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 629-647.
27. MARTENIUK, R. G., LEAVITT, J. L., MACKENZIE, C. L., & ATHENES, S. (1990). Functional relationships between the grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149-176.
28. MARTENIUK, R. G., MACKENZIE, C. L., JEANNEROD, M., ATHENES, S., & DUGAS, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
29. MILNER, A., & GOODALE, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. OLDFIELD, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
31. REMINGTON, R. W., JOHNSTON, J. C., & YANTIS, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by sudden abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290.
32. RIZZOLATTI, G., CAMARDA, R., FOGASSI, L., GENTILUCCI, M., LUPPINO, G., & MATELLI, M. (1988). Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 491-507.
33. ROBERTSON, I., NICO, D., & HOOD, B. (1995). The intention to act improves unilateral neglect: Two demonstrations. NeuroReport, 7, 246-248.
34. ROBERTSON, I., NICO, D., & HOOD, B. (1997). Believing what you feel: Using proprioceptive feedback to reduce unilateral neglect. Neuropsychology, 11, 53-58.
35. SAKATA, H., & TAIRA, M. (1994). Parietal control of hand action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 847-856.
36. SEKULER, A. B., & PALMER, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
37. SIVAK, B., & MACKENZIE, C. L. (1990). Integration of visual information and motor output in reaching and grasping: The contributions of peripheral and central vision. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1095-1116.
38. TIPPER, S. P., HOWARD, L. A., & HOUGHTON, G. (2000). Behavioural consequences of selection from neural population codes. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 223-245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. TIPPER, S. P., HOWARD, L. A., & JACKSON, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
40. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., & HOUGHTON, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
41. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
42. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
43. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1505-1513.