Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 32-44

  Cuijpers, Raymond H ^a,b   Brenner, Eli ^c   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DECISION MAKING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE POSITION; GRASPING; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

FORM PERCEPTION; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749602652     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0531-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679-685
2. Brenner E, Damme WJM van (1999) Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Res 39:975-986
3. Bülthoff HH, Mallot HA (1998) Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. J Opt Soc Am A 5(10):1749-1758
4. Cuijpers RH, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2004) On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. J Neurophysiol 91:2598-2606
5. Elsinger CL, Rosenbaum DA (2003) End posture selection in manual positioning: evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method. Exp Brain Res 152:499-509
6. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433
7. Franz VH, Bülthoff HH, Fahle M (2003) Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation. Exp Brain Res 149:470-477
8. Glover S, Dixon P (2001) Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137:254-258
9. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20-25
10. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI (1994) Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4:604-610
11. Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF (2003) Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 148:196-201
12. Johnston EB (1991) Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Res 31:1351-1360
13. Knill DC (2005) Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vis 5:103-115
14. Mamassian P (1997) Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 114:235-245
15. Nielsen M, Florack L, Deriche R (1997) Regularization, scale-space, and edge detection filters. J Math Imaging Vis 7:291-307
16. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226-234
17. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C (2001) Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 108:709-734
18. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3:237-271
19. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E, De Grave DJ, Cuijpers RH (2002) Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp Brain Res 147:135-144
20. Todd JT, Tittle JS, Norman JF (1995) Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception 24:75-86
21. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 29:404-415
22. Witkin AP (1983) Scale-space filtering. Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell 2:1019-1022
23. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs