Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 1473-1481

  Watt, Simon J ^a   Bradshaw, Mark F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Monocular vision; Prehension; Reaching and grasping; stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TOUCH; VISUAL INFORMATION;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0034308381     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00065-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bootsma R.J., Marteniuk R.G., MacKenzie C.L., Zaal F.T.J.M. The speed accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Experimental Brain Research. 98:1994;535-541.
2. Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D., Carey D.P. The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane 1. Effects of visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research. 112:1996;442-451.
3. Foley J.M. Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review. 87:1980;411-434.
4. Gentilucci M., Chieffi S., Scarpa M., Castiello U. Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behavioural Brain Research. 47:1992;71-82.
5. Gentilucci M., Daprati E., Gangitano M., Saetti M.C., Toni I. On orienting the hand to reach and grasp an object. Neuroreport. 7:1996;589-592.
6. Glennerster A., Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception. 27:1998;1357-1365.
7. Haffenden A.M., Goodale M.A. The influence of a learned color cue to size on visually guided prehension. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 39:1997;s558.
8. Haggard P., Wing A.M. Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking devices. Journal of Motor Behavior. 22:1990;315-321.
9. Jackson S.R., Jones C.A., Newport R., Pritchard C. A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cognition. 4:1997;113-142.
10. Jakobson L.S., Goodale M.A. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research. 86:1991;199-208.
11. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior. 16:1984;235-254.
12. Jeannerod M. The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. 1988;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
13. Marotta J.J., Behrmann M., Goodale M.A. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research. 116:1997;113-121.
14. Marotta J.J., Goodale M.A. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research. 121:1998;465-470.
15. Mon-Williams M., Dijkerman H.C. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research. 128:1999;578-582.
16. Oppenheim A.V., Schafer R.W. Discrete-time signal processing. 1989;Prenctice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Previc F.H. Functional specialization in the lower and supper visual field in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 13:1990;519-575.
18. Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature. 361:1993;253-255.
19. Sakata H., Taira M. Parietal control of hand action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 4:1994;847-856.
20. Sakata H., Taira M., Kusunoki M., Murata A., Tanaka Y. The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends in Neurosciences. 20:1997;350-357.
21. Sakata H., Taira M., Kusunoki M., Murata A., Tanaka Y., Tsutsui K. Neural coding of 3D features of objects for hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society Of London. 353:1998;1363-1373.
22. Servos P., Goodale M.A. Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research. 98:1994;119-127.
23. Servos P., Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Research. 32:1992;1513-1521.
24. Servos P., Jakobson L.S., Goodale M.A. Near, far, on in between? - Target edges and the transport component of prehension. Journal of Motor Behavior. 30:1998;90-93.
25. Shikata E., Tanaka Y., Nakamura H., Taira M., Sakata H. Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of stereoscopic stimuli. Neuroreport. 7:1996;2389-2394.
26. Watt S.J., Bradshaw M.F., Rushton S.K. A restricted field of view affects reaching and grasping. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 40:1999;412.
27. Wing A.M., Turton A., Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior. 18:1986;245-260.