Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape

Nature

Volumn 426, Issue 6967, 2003, Pages 664-667

  Ganel, Tzvi ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; OPHTHALMOLOGY; VISION;

VISUAL CONTROL;

NATURAL SCIENCES;

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; VISION;

FORM PERCEPTION; HAND; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION;

EID: 0348148881     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature02156     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hochstein, S. & Ahissar, M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791-804 (2002).
2. Natsoulas, T. What are the objects of perceptual consciousness? Am. J. Psychol. 96, 435-467 (1983).
3. Pomerantz, J. R. & Pristach, E. A. Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 635-649 (1989).
4. Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353-383 (1977).
5. Goodale, M. A. & Milner, A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20-25 (1992).
6. Goodale, M. A. et al. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 4, 604-610 (1994).
7. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S. & Goodale, M. A. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron 35, 793-801 (2002).
8. Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. & Servos, P. The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 23, 1457-1481 (1994).
9. Garner, W. R. The Processing of Information and Structure (Potomac, Erlbaum, 1974).
10. Garner, W. R. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 107, 287-308 (1978).
11. Koffka, K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt Brace, New York, 1935).
12. Law, M. B. & Abrams, R. A. Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1017-1027 (2003).
13. Duncan, J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 501-517 (1984).
14. O'Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E. & Kanwisher, N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584-587 (1999).
15. Goodale, M. A. & Servos, P. in Advances in Motor Learning and Control (ed. Zelaznik, H. N.) 87-121 (Human Kinetics, Illinois, 1996).
16. Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N. & Duysens, J. Patterns of bimanual interference reveal movement encoding within a radial egocentric reference frame. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 463-471 (2001).
17. Goodale, M. A. & Humphrey, G. K. The objects of action and perception. Cognition 67, 181-207 (1998).
18. Marr, D. Visual information processing: the structure and creation of visual representations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 290, 199-218 (1980).
19. Edelman, S. & Duvdevani-Bar, S. A model of visual recognition and categorization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352, 1191-1202 (1997).
20. Bar, M. Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 793-799 (2001).
21. Poggio, T. & Edelman, S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343, 263-266 (1990).
22. Ganel, T. & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 854-867 (2002).
23. Shalev, L. & Algom, D. Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 997-1017 (2000).
24. Maddox, W. T. in Perceptual and Decisional Separability (ed. Ashby, F. G.) 147-180 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992).
25. Felfoldy, G. L. Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 453-459 (1974).
26. Dykes, J. R. & Cooper, R. G. An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions. Percept. Psychophys. 23, 36-42 (1978).
27. Macmillan, N. A. & Ornstein, A. S. The mean-integral representation of rectangles. Percept. Psychophys. 60, 250-262 (1998).
28. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. & Keillor, J. M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32, 1159-1178 (1994).
29. Kwok, R. M. & Braddick, O. J. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia 41, 932-940 (2003).