Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 266-278

  Glover, Scott ^a,b   Dixon, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; FEEDBACK; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036484467     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195791     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & PRATT, J. (1993). Rapid aimed limb movements: Differential effects of practice on component submovements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 288-298.
2. AGLIOTI, S., DESOUZA, J. R, & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
3. ANDERSON, T. J., JENKINS, I., BROOKS, D., HAWKEN, M., FRACKOWIAK, R., & KENNARD, C. (1994). Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man: A PET study. Brain, 117, 1073-1084.
4. BOCK, O., & JUNGLING, S. (1999). Reprogramming of grip apeiture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 61-66.
5. BRENNER, E., & SMEETS, J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 473-476.
6. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1999). Separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Muessler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial & temporal events (pp. 4-13). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. BRIDGEMAN, B., GEMMER. A., FORSMAN, T., & HUEMER, V. (2000). Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research, 40, 3539-3552.
8. BRIDGEMAN, B., LEWIS, S., HEIT, G., & NAGLE, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 692-700.
9. BRIDGEMAN, B., PEERY, S., & ANAND, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
10. CASTIELLO, U., BENNETT, K., & STELMACH, G. (1993). Reach to grasp: The natural response to perturbation of object size. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 163-178.
11. CASTIELLO, U., & JEANNEROD, M. (1991). Measuring time to awareness. NeuroReport, 2, 797-800.
12. CONNOLLY, J. D., & GOODALE, M. (1999). The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 281-286.
13. COREN, S., & GIRGUS, J. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. COREN, S., & MILLER, J. (1974). Size-contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 355-357.
15. DAPRATI, E., & GENTILUCCI, M. (1997). Grasping an illusion. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1577-1582.
16. DEIBER, M.-P., IBANEZ, V., SADATO, N., & HALLETT, M. (1996). Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 233-247.
17. DIXON, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 390-396.
18. DIXON, P., & O'REILLY, T. (1999). Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 133-149.
19. EKLUND, G. (1972). Position sense and state of contraction. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 35, 606-611.
20. ELLIOT, D., BINSTED, G., & HEATH, M. (1999). The control of goal-directed movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory. Human Movement Science, 18, 121-136.
21. EVARTS, E. V., & VAUGHN, W. (1978). Intended arm movements in response to externally produced arm displacements in man. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Cerebral motor control in man: Long loop mechanisms (Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology, pp. 178-192). Basel: Karger.
22. FLASH, T., & HENIS, E. (1991). Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 220-230.
23. FRANZ, V. H., GEGENFURTNER, K., BÜLTHOFF, H., & FAHLE, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
24. GENTILUCCI, M., CHIEFFI, S., DAPRATI, E., SAETTI, M., & TONI, I. (1996). Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia, 34, 369-376.
25. GENTILUCCI, M., TONI, I., CHIEFFI, S., & PAVESI, G. (1994). The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: A kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 483-500.
26. GLOVER, S. (2001). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action: Studies in healthy and brain-damaged populations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2001a). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 560-572.
28. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2001b). Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 254-258.
29. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2001c). The Müller-Lyer illusion and the accuracy of lower limb movements. Manuscript in preparation.
30. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2001d). The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 96-103.
31. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2002a). The importance of contour discrimination in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Manuscript in preparation.
32. GLOVER, S., & DIXON, P. (2002b). Semantics affect the planning but not on-line control of grasping. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
34. GOODALE, M. A., PELISSON, D., & PRABLANC, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
35. GOODMAN, S. N., & ROYALL, R. (1988). Evidence and scientific research. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1568-1574.
36. HAFFENDEN, A. M., & GOODALE, M. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
37. HAGGARD, P., & WING, A. (1990). Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 315-321.
38. HAGGARD, P., & WING, A. (1997). On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 282-287.
39. JACKSON, G. M., JACKSON, S., HUSAIN, M., HARVEY, M., KRAMER, T., & Dow, L. (2000). The coordination of bimanual prehension movements in a centrally deafferented patient. Brain, 123, 380-393.
40. JACKSON, S. R., & SHAW, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip force but not grip aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 418-423.
41. JAKOBSON, L. S., & GOODALE, M. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
42. JEANNEROD, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
43. JEANNEROD, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. JEANNEROD, M., MICHEL, F., & PRABLANC, C. (1984). The control of hand movements in a case of hemianaesthesia following a parietal lesion. Brain, 107, 899-920.
45. KEELE, S. W., & POSNER, M. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155-158.
46. KHAN, M. A., FRANKS, I., & GOODMAN, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an inter-dependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 425-444.
47. KOLB, B., & WHISHAW, I. (1995). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. New York: Freeman.
48. LEE, R. G., & TATTON, W. (1975). Motor responses to sudden limb displacements in primates with specific CNS lesions and in human patients with motor system disorders. Canadian Journal of Neurological Science, 2, 285-293.
49. MAROTTA, J. J., DESOUZA, J., HAFFENDEN, A., & GOODALE, M. (1998). Does a monocularly-presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? Neuropsychologia, 36, 491-497.
50. MARTENIUK, R. G., MACKENZIE, C., JEANNEROD, M., ATHENES, S., & DUGAS, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
51. McCOLLOUGH, C. (1965). Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science, 149, 1115-1116.
52. MEYER, D. E., ABRAMS, R., KORNBLUM, S., WRIGHT, C., & SMITH, K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
53. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. MISHKIN, M., UNGERLEIDER, L., & MACKO, K. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.
55. OTTO-DE HAART, E. G., CAREY, D. P., & MILNE, A. B. (1999). More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1437-1444.
56. PAILLARD, J., & BROUCHON, M. (1968). Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In S. J. Freedman (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (pp. 37-55). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
57. PAULIGNAN, Y., JEANNEROD, M., MACKENZIE, C., & MARTENIUK, R. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: II. The effects of changing object size. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 407-420.
58. PAULIGNAN, Y, MACKENZIE, C., MARTENIUK, R., & JEANNEROD, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: I. The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
59. PAVANI, F., BOSCAGLI, I., BENVENUTI, F., RABUFFETTI, M., & FARNE, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research. 127, 95-101.
60. PRABLANC, C., & MARTIN, O. (1992). Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 455-469.
61. PRATT, J., & ABRAMS, R. (1996). Practice and component submovements: The roles of programming and feedback in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 396-426.
62. REDDING, G. M., & WALLACE, B. (1994). Effects of movement duration and visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 257-266.
63. REDDING, G. M., & WALLACE, B. (1997). Prism adaptation during target pointing from visible and nonvisible starting locations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 119-130.
64. SAINBURG, R. L., POIZNER, H., & GHEZ, C. (1993). Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. Journal of Neumphysiology, 70, 2136-2147.
65. SAVELSBERGH, G. J., WHITING, H., & BOOTSMA, R. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 315-322.
66. SMEETS, J. B., & BRENNER, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 19-31.
67. SMEETS, J. B., ERKELENS, C., & VAN DER GON, J. (1990). Adjustments of fast goal-directed movements in response to an unexpected inertial load. Experimental Brain Research, 81, 302-312.
68. STARK, L. (1968). Neurological control systems: Studies in bioengineering. New York: Plenum.
69. VAN DONKELAAR, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 517-520.
70. WESTWOOD, D. A., HEATH, M., & ROY, E. (2000). The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 545-548.
71. WING, A. M., & FRASER, C. (1983). The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A. 297-309.
72. WING, A. M., TURTON, A., &ERASER, C. ( 1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 245-260.
73. WONG, E., & MACK, A. (1981). Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica, 48, 123-131.
74. WOODWORTH, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monographs, 3 (2), 1-114.
75. ZELAZNIK, H. N., HAWKINS, B., & KISSELBURGH, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217-236.