The Visual Control of Reaching and Grasping: Binocular Disparity and Motion Parallax

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 404-415

  Watt, Simon J ^a,b   Bradshaw, Mark F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ARM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0042352175     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.404     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Berthier, N. E., Clifton, R. K., Gullapalli, V., MCCall, D. D., & Robin, D. (1996). Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 187-197.
2. Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1314-1334.
3. Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception/action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception for reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1-25.
4. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., & Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1436-1460.
5. Bradshaw, M. F., Glennerster, A., & Rogers, B. J. (1996). The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Research, 36, 1255-1264.
6. Bradshaw, M. F., & Hibbard, P. B. (2001). The combination of stereo and motion information in the control of reaching and grasping, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42, s620.
7. Bradshaw, M. F., Hibbard, P. B., van der Willigen, R., Watt, S. J., Davies, I. R. L., Beagley, A., & Willis, A. (2000). Can observers exploit enhanced-disparity information to control reaching movements within telepresence environments? Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, 3957, 253-263.
8. Bradshaw, M. F., Parton, A. D., & Glennerster, A. (2000). The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research, 40, 3725-3734.
9. Bradshaw, M. F., & Rogers, B. J. (1996). The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Research, 36, 3457-3468.
10. Bradshaw, M. F., & Watt, S. J. (2002). A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: The effect of temporal delay. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1766-1778.
11. Churchill, A., Hopkins, B., Rönnqvist, L., & Vogt, S. (2000). Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 81-89.
12. Connolly, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 281-286.
13. Coull, J., Tremblay, L., Elliott, D., Weir, P. L., & Weeks, D. J. (2000). Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 347-360.
14. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., & Carey, D. P. (1996). The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane: 1. Effects of visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 112, 442-451.
16. Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D., & Carey, D. P. (1999). Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1505-1510.
17. Fisher, S. K., & Ciuffreda, K. J. (1989). The effect of accommodative hysteresis on apparent distance. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 9, 184-190.
18. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87, 411-434.
19. Gardner, P. L., & Mon-Williams, M. (2000). Vertical gaze angle: Absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 379-385.
20. Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., Gangitano, M., Saetti, M. C., & Toni, I. (1996). On orienting the hand to reach and grasp an object. NeuroReport, 7, 589-592.
21. Gentilucci, M., Toni, I., Chieffi, S., & Pavesi, G. (1994). The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: A kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 483-500.
22. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1996). Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Research, 36, 3441-3456.
23. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1998). Cues to viewing distance for stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception, 27, 1357-1365.
24. Goodale, M. A., Péllison, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986, April 24). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
25. Grant, V. W. (1942). Accommodation and convergence in visual space perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 89-104.
26. Jackson, S. R., Jones, C. A., Newport, R., & Pritchard, C. (1997). A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Visual Cognition, 4, 113-142.
27. Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
28. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 153-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235-254.
30. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., & Landy, M. S. (1994). Integration of stereo and motion cues. Vision Research, 34, 2259-2275.
31. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 377-385.
32. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
33. Marotta, J. J., Behrmann, M., & Goodale, M. A. (1997). The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 113-121.
34. Marotta, J. J., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping, Experimental Brain Research, 121, 465-470.
35. Marotta, J. J., Kruyer, A., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 134-138.
36. Marotta, J. J., Perrot, T. S., Nicolle, D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The development of adaptive head movements following enucleation. Eye, 9, 333-336.
37. Marotta, J. J., Perrot, T. S., Nicolle, D., Servos, P., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Adapting to monocular vision - grasping with one eye. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 107-114.
38. Mon-Williams, M., & Dijkerman, H. C. (1999). The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 578-582.
39. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (2000). Ordinal depth information from accommodation? Ergonomics, 43, 391-404.
40. Mon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., & Roberts, A. (2000). Vergence provides veridical depth perception from horizontal retinal image disparities. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 407-413.
41. Paillard, J. (1982). The contribution of peripheral and central vision to visually guided reaching. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 367-385). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual field in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 519-575.
43. Richards, W. (1985). Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 343-349.
44. Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1993, January 21). Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature, 361, 253-255.
45. Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
46. Sakata, H., & Taira, M. (1994). Parietal control of hand action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 847-856.
47. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., & Tanaka, Y. (1997). The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 350-357.
48. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., Tanaka, Y., & Tsutsui, K. (1998). Neural coding of 3D features of objects for hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, 353, 1363-1373.
49. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., Tsutsui, K., Tanaka, Y., et al. (1999). Neural representation of three-dimensional features of manipulation objects with stereopsis. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 160-169.
50. Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 21.1-21.57). New York: Wiley.
51. Servos, P., & Goodale, M. A. (1994). Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 119-127.
52. Servos, P., Goodale, M. A., & Jakobson, L. S. (1992). The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research, 32, 1513-1521.
53. Shikata, E., Tanaka, Y., Nakamura, H., Taira, M., & Sakata, H. (1996). Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of stereoscopic stimuli, NeuroReport, 7, 2389-2394.
54. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Kelly, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 39-44.
55. Viguier, A., Clément, G., & Trotter, Y. (2001). Distance perception within near visual space. Perception, 30, 115-124.
56. Watt, S. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (2000). Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1473-1481.
57. Wickelgren, E. A., MCConnell, D. S., & Bingham, G. P. (2000). Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1051-1059.
58. Wing, A. M., Turton, A., & Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 245-260.