Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: One- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment

Spatial Vision

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 377-392

  Vishton, Peter M ^a   Fabre, Edward ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Human; Illusion; Perception; Prehension

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN REACTION TIME; MOTION ESTIMATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT; EBBINGHAUS ILLUSION; ONE HANDED; ONE HANDED GRASPING; TWO HANDED GRASPING;

STEREO VISION;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038537372     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856803322467590     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brenner, E. and Smeets, J. B. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp and object, Exper. Brain Res. 111, 473-476.
2. Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 379-382.
3. Bruno, N. and Bernardis, P. (2001). Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion, Poster presented at the 1st Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, p. 71.
4. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 109-113.
5. DeLucia, P. R., Tresilian, J. R. and Meyer, L. E. (2000). Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 26, 552-567.
6. Ellis, R. R., Flanagan, J. R. and Lederman, S. J. (1999). The influence of visual illusions on grasp position, Exper. Brain Res. 125, 109-114.
7. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H. and Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action, Psychol. Sci. 11, 20-25.
8. Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bülthoff, H. H. and Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001). Effects of visual illusions on grasping, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 27, 1124-1144.
9. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 288-292.
10. Glover, S. and Dixon, P. (2001a). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual systems in the planning and control of reaching, J. Exper. Psychol. Human Perception 27, 560-572.
11. Glover, S. and Dixon, P. (2001b). Motor adaptation to an optical illusion, Exper. Brain Res. 137, 254-258.
12. Glover, S. and Dixon, P. (2001c). The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action, Canad. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 96-103.
13. Glover, S. and Dixon, P. (2002). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action. Perception and Psychophysics 64, 266-278.
14. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. and Keillor, J. M. (1994). Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements, Neuropsychologia 32, 1159-1178.
15. Haffenden, A. M. and Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 122-136.
16. Haffenden, A. M., Schiff, K. C. and Goodale, M. A. (2001). The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Current Biology 11, 177-181.
17. Jackson, S. R. and Shaw, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements, J. Exper. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 26, 418-423.
18. Marotta, J. J. and Goodale, M. A. (2001). Role of familiar size in the control of grasping, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (1), 8-17.
19. Marotta, J. J., DeSouza, J. F. X., Haffenden, A. M. and Goodale, M. A. (1998). Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? Neuropsychologia 36, 491-497.
20. Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.
21. Mon-Williams, M. and Bull, R. (2000). The Judd illusion: evidence for two visual streams or two experimental conditions? Exper. Brain Res. 130, 273-276.
22. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabuffetti, M. and Farne, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Exper. Brain Res. 127, 95-101.
23. Servos, P., Goodale, M. A. and Jakobson, L. S. (1992). The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis, Vision Research 32, 1513-1521.
24. Smeets, J. B. and Brenner, E. (1999). A new view on grasping, Motor Control 3, 237-271.
25. Smeets, J. B., Brenner, E. De Grave, D. D. and Cuijpers, R. H. (2002). Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes, Exper. Brain Res. 147, 135-144.
26. Ungerleider, L. G. and Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems, in: Analysis of Visual Behavior, Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A. and Mansfield, R. J. W. (Eds). pp. 549-586, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
27. van Donkelaar, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions, Exp. Brain Res. 125, 517-520.
28. Vishton, P.M., Rea, J. G., Cutting, J. E. and Nunez L. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative vs. absolute, not perception vs. action, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 25, 1659-1672.
29. Westwood, D. A., Chapman, C. D. and Roy, E. A. (2000a). Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream, Exper. Brain Res. 130, 545-548.
30. Westwood, D. A., Dubrowski, A., Carnahan, H. and Roy, E. A. (2000b). The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects, Exper. Brain Res. 135 (4), 535-543
31. Westwood, D. A., Heath, M. and Roy, E. A. (2000c). The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension, Exper. Brain Res. 134, 456-463.
32. Westwood, D. A., Heath, M. and Roy, E. A. (2001a). The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions, Canad. J. Exper. Psychol. 55 (4), 304-310.
33. Westwood, D. A., McEachern, T. and Roy, E. A. (2001b). Delayed grasping of a Muller-Lyer figure, Exper. Brain Res. 141 (2), 166-173.
34. Westwood, D. A., Danckert, J., Servos, P. and Goodale, M. A. (2002). Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia, Exper. Brain Res. 144 (2), 262-267.
35. Yamagishi, N., Anderson, S. J. and Ashida, H. (2001). Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, Biol. Sci. 268 (1470), 973-977.