The neurobiology of visual attention: finding sources

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-165

  Moore, Tirin ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; HUMAN; MONKEY; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULATION; STIMULUS; THEORY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; NERVE NET; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645754726     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.009     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. James W. Principles of Psychology (1890), H. Holt
2. Miller B.T., and D'Esposito M. Searching for 'the Top' in top-down control. Neuron 48 (2005) 535-538
3. Kincade J.M., Abrams R.A., Astafiev S.V., Shulman G.L., and Corbetta M. An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 4593-4604
4. Silver M.A., Ress D., and Heeger D.J. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol 94 (2005) 1358-1371
5. Hopf J.M., Boelmans K., Schoenfeld M.A., Luck S.J., and Heinze H.J. Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 1822-1832
6. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18 (1995) 193-222
7. Knierim J.J., and van Essen D.C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 67 (1992) 961-980
8. Kastner S., Nothdurft H.C., and Pigarev I.N. Neuronal correlates of pop-out in cat striate cortex. Vision Res 37 (1997) 371-376
9. Hopf J.M., Noesselt T., Tempelmann C., Braun J., Schoenfeld M.A., and Heinze H.J. Popout modulates focal attention in the primary visual cortex. Neuroimage 22 (2004) 574-582
10. Zhaoping L. The primary visual cortex creates a bottom-up saliency map. In: Itti L., Rees G., and Tsotsos J.K. (Eds). Neurobiology of Attention (2005), Elsevier 570-575
11. Hegde J., and Felleman D.J. How selective are V1 cells for pop-out stimuli?. J Neurosci 23 (2003) 9968-9980
12. Beck D.M., and Kastner S. Stimulus context modulates competition in human extrastriate cortex. Nat Neurosci 8 (2005) 1110-1116. This human functional imaging study examines competitive interactions of multiple visual stimulus representations in extrastriate cortex. The activity driven by single stimuli is suppressed by the addition of others, but top-down attention can bias competitive interactions in favor of the attended item, thus removing some of the distractor-driven suppression. This study finds that when items are presented in a pop-out display, in which the item is involuntarily selected, the suppressive interactions are eliminated.
13. Constantinidis C., and Steinmetz M.A. Posterior parietal cortex automatically encodes the location of salient stimuli. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 233-238
14. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 (2002) 201-215
15. Bisley J.W., Krishna B.S., and Goldberg M.E. A rapid and precise on-response in posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 1833-1838
16. Thompson K.G., Hanes D.P., Bichot N.P., and Schall J.D. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. J Neurophysiol 76 (1996) 4040-4055
17. Thompson K.G., Bichot N.P., and Sato T.R. Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. J Neurophysiol 93 (2005) 337-351
18. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., and Umilta C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25 (1987) 31-40
19. Kowler E., Anderson E., Dosher B., and Blaser E. The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Res 35 (1995) 1897-1916
20. Hoffman J.E., and Subramaniam B. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57 (1995) 787-795
21. Deubel H., and Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res 36 (1996) 1827-1837
22. Ferrier D. Cerebral Localisation (1890), Smith, Elder and co.
23. Reynolds J.H., and Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 27 (2004) 611-647
24. Bushnell M.C., Goldberg M.E., and Robinson D.L. Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. J Neurophysiol 46 (1981) 755-772
25. Moran J., and Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229 (1985) 782-784
26. Motter B.C. Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. J Neurophysiol 70 (1993) 909-919
27. Li W., Piech V., and Gilbert C.D. Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 651-657
28. McAdams C.J., and Reid R.C. Attention modulates the responses of simple cells in monkey primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 11023-11033. An impressive and carefully conducted test of the influence of attention on the V1 simple cells. Remarkably, the authors find that attention effects are present within both the primary and secondary subfields of simple cells, which sit at the first stage of visual cortical processing.
29. Kastner S., O'Connor D.H., Fukui M.M., Fehd H.M., Herwig U., and Pinsk M.A. Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. J Neurophysiol 91 (2004) 438-448
30. Moore T., Armstrong K.M., and Fallah M. Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention. Neuron 40 (2003) 671-683
31. Chelazzi L., Miller E.K., Duncan J., and Desimone R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363 (1993) 345-347
32. Tolias A.S., Moore T., Smirnakis S.M., Tehovnik E.J., Siapas A.G., and Schiller P.H. Eye movements modulate visual receptive fields of V4 neurons. Neuron 29 (2001) 757-767
33. Ogawa T., and Komatsu H. Target selection in area V4 during a multidimensional visual search task. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 6371-6382
34. Sheinberg D.L., and Logothetis N.K. Noticing familiar objects in real world scenes: the role of temporal cortical neurons in natural vision. J Neurosci 21 (2001) 1340-1350
35. Mazer J.A., and Gallant J.L. Goal-related activity in V4 during free viewing visual search. Evidence for a ventral stream visual salience map. Neuron 40 (2003) 1241-1250
36. Bichot N.P., Rossi A.F., and Desimone R. Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science 308 (2005) 529-533. This elegant study looks for evidence of parallel and serial search correlates in the responses of single neurons, and the synchrony between the neuronal responses and the local field potential at sites within area V4 of monkeys performing a freely scanning visual search task. The authors find evidence of parallel selection by V4 neurons: distractor items with similar features as the target item yielded enhanced responses and synchrony in the gamma frequency range. The authors also found evidence of serial selection: enhanced neural activity when the RF stimulus was ultimately selected as the target for a saccade.
37. Gallant J.L., Connor C.E., and Van Essen D.C. Neural activity in areas V1, V2 and V4 during free viewing of natural scenes compared to controlled viewing. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 2153-2158
38. Moore T. Shape representations and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. Science 285 (1999) 1914-1917
39. Stanton G.B., Bruce C.J., and Goldberg M.E. Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields. J Comp Neurol 353 (1995) 291-305
40. Shipp S. The brain circuitry of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 8 (2004) 223-230
41. Schiller P.H., and Tehovnik E.J. Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements. Prog Brain Res 149 (2005) 157-171
42. McPeek R.M., and Keller E.L. Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 757-763
43. Wardak C., Olivier E., and Duhamel J.R. A deficit in covert attention after parietal cortex inactivation in the monkey. Neuron 42 (2004) 501-508
44. Moore T., and Fallah M. Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. J Neurophysiol 91 (2004) 152-162. This study tests the hypothesis that saccade preparation biases visual detection at the location to which the saccade is prepared. The authors found that when they stimulated sites within the FEF (using currents too weak to evoke a movement) it led to improved detection of visual events at the location represented by neurons at the stimulation site. Importantly, the authors also find that the psychophysical improvement is best when the microstimulation temporally coincides with the time of the target event.
45. Chambers C.D., and Mattingley J.B. Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications. Trends Cogn Sci 9 (2005) 542-550
46. Cavanaugh J., and Wurtz R.H. Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 11236-11243
47. Muller J.R., Philiastides M.G., and Newsome W.T. Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 524-529
48. Cutrell E.B., and Marrocco R.T. Electrical microstimulation of primate posterior parietal cortex initiates orienting and alerting components of covert attention. Exp Brain Res 144 (2002) 103-113
49. Gottlieb J. Parietal mechanisms of target representation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12 (2002) 134-140
50. Gottlieb J., Kusunoki M., and Goldberg M.E. Simultaneous representation of saccade targets and visual onsets in monkey lateral intraparietal area. Cereb Cortex 15 (2005) 1198-1206
51. Moore T., and Armstrong K.M. Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature 421 (2003) 370-373
52. Cohen Y.E., and Knudsen E.I. Maps versus clusters: different representations of auditory space in the midbrain and forebrain. Trends Neurosci 22 (1999) 128-135
53. Knudsen E.I., Cohen Y.E., and Masino T. Characterization of a forebrain gaze field in the archistriatum of the barn owl: microstimulation and anatomical connections. J Neurosci 15 (1995) 5139-5151
54. Winkowski J., and Knudsen E.I. Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl. Nature 439 (2006) 336-339
55. Awh E., Armstrong K.M., and Moore T. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci 10 (2006) 124-130
56. Thompson K.G., Biscoe K.L., and Sato T.R. Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 9479-9487. The first demonstration of attentional modulation of FEF neurons in a task that does not involve a saccadic eye movement. The authors find that of the three major classes of neurons, visual, visuomovement, and movement, defined in a standard memory-guided saccade task, it is the visual and visuomovement neurons that are modulated by attention. The movement neurons appeared to be suppressed, thus demonstrating that the functional divergence of covert and overt attention signals occurs within the FEF.
57. Ignashchenkova A., Dicke P.W., Haarmeier T., and Thier P. Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 56-64
58. Schall J.D. On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vision Res 44 (2004) 1453-1467
59. Mitchell J.F., Stoner G.R., and Reynolds J.H. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429 (2004) 410-413
60. Martinez-Trujillo J.C., and Treue S. Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Curr Biol 14 (2004) 744-751
61. Hayden B.Y., and Gallant J.L. Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4. Neuron 47 (2005) 637-643
62. Hopf J.M., Boelmans K., Schoenfeld M.A., Luck S.J., and Heinze H.J. Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 1822-1832
63. Thompson K.G., and Bichot N.P. A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. Prog Brain Res 147 (2005) 251-262
64. Chawla D., Rees G., and Friston K.J. The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat Neurosci 2 (1999) 671-676
65. Lebedev M.A., Messinger A., Kralik J.D., and Wise S.P. Representation of attended versus remembered locations in prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biol 2 (2004) e365. This timely study compares the influence of working memory and attention on the activity of neurons in prefrontal cortex. Monkeys performed a task in which they had to attend simultaneously to one location while remembering another. The authors found that the largest proportion of neurons signaled the attended location and not the remembered one, thus calling into question long-held assumptions of a role of prefrontal cortex principally in working memory.