Visual illusion and action

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 369-376

  Gentilucci, Maurizio ^a   Chieffi, Sergio ^a   Daprati, Elena ^a   Saetti, M Cristina ^a   Toni, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Humans; Muller lyer illusion; Non visual feedback; Pointing; Visual feedback; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0029936484     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00128-X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blakemore, C., Carpenter, R. H. S. and Georgeson, M. A. Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature 228, 37-39, 1970.
2. Blouin, J., Bard, C., Teasdale, N., Paillard, J., Fleury, M., Forget, R. and Lamarre, J. Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and a deafferented patient. Exp. Brain Res. 93, 324-331, 1993.
3. Bridgeman, B. In Presbyopia Research: From Molecular Biology to Visual Adaptation, G. Obrecht and W. Stark (Editors), pp. 189-198. Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
4. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M. and Sperling, A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspect of visual function using induced motion. Percept. Psychophys. 29, 336-342, 1981.
5. Chaing, C. A. A new theory to explain geometrical illusions produced by crossing lines. Percept. Psychophys. 3, 174-176, 1968.
6. Conti, P. and Beaubaton, D. Role of the structural field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Percept. Mot. Skills 50, 239-244, 1980.
7. Coren, S. and Girgus, J. S. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. VIII: Perception, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz and H. L. Teuber (Editors), pp. 549-568. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.
8. Coren, S. and Miller, J. Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 355-357, 1974.
9. Elliot, D. and Madalena, J. The influence of pre-movement visual information on manual aiming. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 39A, 541-559, 1987.
10. Festinger, L., White, C. W. and Allyn, M. R. Eye movements and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Percept. Psychophys. 3, 376-382, 1968.
11. Flanders, M., Helms Tillery, S. I. and Soechting, J. F. Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation. Behav. Brain Sci. 15, 309-362, 1992.
12. Foley, J. M. Effects of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception 6, 449-460, 1977.
13. Gentilucci, M. and Negrotti, A. Dissociation between perception and visuo-motor transformation during reproduction of remembered distances. J. Neurophys. 72, 2026-2030, 1994.
14. Gentilucci, M., Toni, I., Chieffi, S. and Pavesi, G. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: A kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 99, 483-500, 1994.
15. Gillam, G. and Chambers, D. Size and position are incongruous: Measurements on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Percept. Psychophys. 37, 549-556, 1985.
16. Ginsburg, A. Psychological correlates of a model of the human visual system. Proc. 1971 Naecon. 283-290, 1971.
17. Gnadt, J. W., Bracewell, R. M. and Anderson, R. A. Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual target. Vision Res. 4, 693-715, 1991.
18. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. and Keilor, J. M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32, 1159-1178, 1994.
19. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jackobson, L. S. and Carey. D. P. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349, 154-156, 1991.
20. Gregory, R. L. Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature 199, 678-680, 1963.
21. Jeannerod, M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J. Mot. Behav. 16, 235-254. 1984.
22. Mack, A., Heuer, F., Villardi, K. and Chambers, D. The dissociation of position and extent in Müller-Lyer figures. Percept. Psychophys. 37, 335-344, 1985.
23. Marr, D. Vision, Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
24. Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. In Progress in Brain Research T. P. Hicks, S. Molotchnikoff and T. Ono (Editors), pp. 317-337. Esevier, Amsterdam, 1993.
25. Milner, A. D., Perret, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W., et al. Perception and action in visual form agnosia. Brain 114, 405-428, 1991.
26. Müller-Lyer, F. C. Dubloid-Reynolds Archive für Anatomie und Physiologie (suppl.), pp. 263-270, 1889.
27. Paillard, J. In Brain and Space, J. Paillard (Editor), pp. 293-306. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991.
28. Pratt, J. and Abrams, R. A. Action-centered inhibition: effects of distractors on movement planning and execution. Hum. Mov. Science 13, 245-254, 1994.
29. Prinzmetal, W. and Gettleman, L. Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two. Percept. Psychophys. 53, 81-88, 1993.
30. Restle, F. and Decker, J. Size of the Müller-Lyer illusion as a function of its dimensions: Theory and data. Percept. Psychophys. 21, 489-503, 1977.
31. Soechting, J. F. and Flanders, M. In Motor control: Concepts and Issues, D. R. Humphrey and H. J. Freund (Editors), pp. 293-306. Wiley, Chichester, 1991.
32. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C. and Baylis, G. C. Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 18, 891-905, 1992.
33. Ungerleider, L. G. and Mishkin, M. In Analysis of Visual Behavior, D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale and R. J. W. Mansfield (Editors), pp. 549-586. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
34. Velay, J. L. and Beaubaton. D. Influence of visual context on pointing movement accuracy. Cah. Psychol. Cog. 6, 447-456, 1986.
35. Ventre, J., Flandrin, J. M. and Jeannerod, M. In search of the egocentric reference. A neurophysiological hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 22, 797-806, 1984.
36. Von Békésy, G. In Sensory Inhibition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967.
37. Wong, E. and Mack, A. Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychol. 48, 123-131, 1981.