A literature review of computers and pedagogy for journalism and mass communication education

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 399-412

  Hoag, Anne M ^a   Bhattacharya, Sandhya S ^a   Helsel, Jeffrey ^a   Hu, Yifeng ^a   Lee, Sangki ^a   Kim, Jinhee ^a   Kim, Sunghae ^a   Michael, Patty Wharton ^a   Park, Chongdae ^a   Sager, Sheila S ^a   Seo, Sangho ^a   Stark, Crajg ^a   Yeo, Benjamin ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649437083     PISSN: 10776958     EISSN: 21614326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107769580205700408     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. R. Reis, A. G. Stravitsky, et al. “Journalism at a distance: The Oregon experiment.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 54(4) (2000): 14-28
2. J. E. Aitken and L. J. Shedlesky, “Using Electronic Discussion to Teach Communication Courses.” Communication Education 51(3) (2002): 325-331.
3. W. S. Maki and R. H. Maki, “Learning about screening using an online or live lecture -Does it matter?” Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(7) (2002)
4. A. Spickard, N. Alrajeh, et al., “Assessing a computer-aided instructional strategy in a world geography course,’’ Journal of Geography in Higher Education 25(3) (2001).
5. C. Cookman, “A Computer-based Graphics Course and Students’ Cognitive Skills.” Journalism & Mass-Communication Educator 53 (1998): 37-49.
6. S.A. Gunaratne and B. S. Lee, “Integration of Internet Resources into Curriculum and Instruction.” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 51 (1996): 25-35.
7. S.C. Hammond, D. Peterson, et al. “Print, broadcast, and online convergence in the newsroom,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 55 (2000): 16-26.
8. L.D. Davenport, F. Fico, et al. “Computer-assisted reporting in classrooms: A decade of diffusion and a comparison to newsrooms,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 57 (2002): 6-22
9. K. R. Blake, “Using World Wide Web to Teach News Writing Online,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 55 (2000): 4-13.
10. K. K Gower and J.-Y. Cho, “Use of the Internet in the public relations curriculum,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 56(2) (2001): 81-92.
11. T.C. Russo, “Making Connections: Enhancing Classroom Learning with a Virtual Visiting Professor,” Communication Teacher 15(3) (2001): 7-8
12. A. Hoag and T. E Baldwin, “Using Case Method and Experts in Inter-University Electronic Learning Teams,” Educational Technology & Society 3(3) (2000): 337-348.
13. S. A. Guthrie, “Making the World Wide Web accessible to all students,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 55(1) (2000): 14-23.
14. J. Lee, “The effects of past computer experience on computerized aptitude test performance,” Educational and Psychological Measurement 46(3) (1986): 727-733
15. C. R. Scott and S. C. Rockwell “The Effect of Communication, Writing, and Technology Apprehension on Likelihood to Use New Communication Technologies,” Communication Education 46(1) (1997): 44-62
16. C. Taylor, I. Kirsch, et al., ”Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks,” Language Learning 49(2) (1999): 219-274.
17. G. Fulcher, “Computerizing an English language placement test,” ELT Journal 53(4) (1999): 289-299.
18. D. T. Holt and M. Crocker, “Prior negative experiences: their impact on computer training outcomes,” Computers & Education 35(4) (2000): 295-308.
19. A.S. McDonald, “The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computerbased and paper-and-pencil educational assessments,” Computers 6. Education 39(3) (2002): 299-312.
20. T. Levine, and S. Donitsa-Schmidt “Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior 14(1) (1998): 125-146
21. L. Shashaani, ‘‘Gender differences in computer experience and its influence on computer attitude,” Journal of Educational Computing Research 11 (4) (1994): 347-367.
22. R.S. Lee, “Social attitudes and the computer revolution,” Public Opinion Quarterly 33(1970): 53-59.
23. D.B. Brock and L. M. Sulsky, “Attitudes toward Computers: Construct Validation and Relations to Computer Use,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(1) (1994): 17-35.
24. 2o R.H. Kay, “An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The Computer Aided Measure (CAM),” Computers in Human Behavior 9(4) (1993): 371-386.
25. Scott and Rockwell, “The Effect of Communication Writing and Technology Apprehension on Likelihood to use New Communication Technologies, 44-62
26. B. Nelson, R. Dunn, et al.,” Effects of learning style intervention on college students’ retention and achievement,” Journal of College Student Development 34(1993): 364-369
27. J.L. Ross, M. T. B. Drysdale, et al., “Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in two postsecondary computer application courses,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33(4) (2001): 400-412.
28. X. C Wang, D. M. Hinn, et al. “Potential of computer-supported collaborative learning for learners with different learning styles,” Journal of Reseorch on Technology in Education 34(1) (2001): 75-85
29. D.W. Sanders and A. I. Morrison-Shetlar “Student attitudes toward Web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33(3) (2001): 251-262.
30. M. Chen, “Gender differences in adolescents’ uses of and attitudes toward computers,” Communicotion-Yearbook 10(1987): 200-216.
31. J. E. Walters and J. R. Necessary, “An attitudinal comparison toward computers between underclassmen and graduating seniors,” Education 116(4) (1996): 623-630.
32. L. Shashaani and A. Khalilib “Gender and computers: similarities and differences in Iranian college students’ attitudes toward computers,” Computers_&E ducation 37(4) (2001): 363-375.
33. H. Chou, “Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness,” Computers b Educotion 37(1) (2001): 11-25
34. B.W. Brown and C. E. Liedholm “Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics?” American Economic Review (2002): 1-12.
35. L. E. Houtz and U. G. Gupta, “Nebraska high school students’ computer skills and attitudes,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 33(3) (2001): 316-327
36. J.C. Sweeney and D. Ingram, “A comparison of traditional and Web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study,” Journal of Marketing Education 23(1) (2001).
37. R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and I. Bar-Natan, “Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) ,” Computers b Education 39(1) (2002): 19-36.
38. D. E. Alperin, “The physically disabled BSW student: Implications for field education,” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 2(2) (1988): 99-111
39. B.S. Coleand and M. W. Cain, “Social Work Students with disabilities: A proactive approach to accommodation,” Journal of Social WorkEducation 32(1996): 339-349.
40. L. C. Mechling, D. L. Gast, et al., “Computerbased video instruction to teach persons with moderate intellectual disabilities to read grocery aisle signs and locate items,” Applied Measurement in Education 7(1) (2002): 53-79
41. J. C. Bricout, “Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation needs of students with disabilities,” Journal of Social Work Education 37(2) (2001): 267.
42. T. S. Hasselbring and C. H. W. Glaser, “Use of computer technology to help students with special needs,” The Future of Children 10(2) (2000): 102-122.
43. W.R. Oates, “Software Exchange Available Online in AEJMC Forum,” Journalism Educator 42 (2) (1987): 47-48
44. R. Fischer and E. K. Grusin, “Grammar Checkers: Programs That May Not Enhance Learning,” Journalism Educator 47(4) (1993): 20-27
45. W.E. Smith, “Computer-Mediated Communication: An Experimental Study,” Journalism Educator 48(4) (1994): 27-33.
46. R. A. Clark and D. Jones, “A Comparison of Traditional and Online Formats in a Public Speaking Course,” Communication Education 50(2) (2001): 109-124.
47. J.B. Hester, “Using a Web-Based Interactive Test as a Learning Tool,” Journalism B Mass Communication Educator 54(1) (1999): 35-41.
48. S. L. Althaus, “Computer-Mediated Communication in the University Classroom: An Experiment with On-line Discussions,” Communication Education 46(2) (1997): 158-174.
49. W.E. Smith, “News Writing Students Prefer Computer Simulations,” Journalism Educator 45(2) (1990): 38-44.
50. C. Smith, H. Kim, et al., “Computer-mediated communication and strategies for teaching: Instructional use of e-mail and bulletin boards,” Journalism Educator 48(1) (1993): 80-83.
51. C. Haythornthwaite, M. M. Kazmer, et al., “Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions,” Journal ofComputer-Mediated Communication 6 (1) (2000)
52. B.A. Olaniran, G. T. Savage, et al., “Experimental and Experiential Approaches to Teaching Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Discussion,” Communication Education 45(July 1996): 244-259.
53. R. Huesca, “Reinventing Journalism Curricula for the Electronic Environment,” Communication Education 55(2000): 4-15.
54. D. G. Martin and C. Lloyd, “Media Planning Courses and Dedicated Software.” Journalism Educator 47 (1) (1992): 38-47
55. K. W. King and M. Morrison, “A Media Buying Simulation Game Using the Internet,” Journalism &Mass Communication Educator 53(3) (1998): 28-36.
56. M. A. Hignite and L. J. Echternacht, “Computer Attitudes and Literacy Assessmenk Are Tomorrow’s Business Teachers Prepared?” Journal of Education for Business 67(4) (1992): 249
57. D. Panici, “New Media and the Introductory Mass Communication Course,” Journalism b Mass Communication Educator 53(1) (1998): 52-63
58. A. Mitra, T. Steffensmeier, et al., “Changes in Attitudes Toward Computers and Use of Computers by University Faculty,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32(1) (1999): 189-202
59. T.H. Spotts, “Discriminating factors in Faculty use of Instructional Technology in Higher Education,” Educational Technology 6 Society 2(4) (1999): 92
60. N.B. Adams, “Educational Computing Concerns of Postsecondary Faculty,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(3) (2002): 284-303.
61. L. E. Gueldenzoph, S. Guidera, et al., “Faculty Use of Instructional Technology in the University Classroom,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 28(2) (1999): 121-135.
62. J.B. Singer, D. Craig, et al. “Attitudes of Professors and Students about New Media Technology,” Journalism & Mass Comm unicationducator 51 (2) (1996): 36-45
63. K.C. Lee and C. A. Fleming “Problems of Introducing Courses in Computer-Assisted Reporting,” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 50(3) (1995): 23-34.
64. J. Takacs, W. M. Reed, et al., “The Effects of Online Multimedia Project Development, Learning Style, and Prior Computer Experiences on Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the Internet and Hypermedia,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 31(4) (1999): 341
65. J. Wishart and D. Blease, “Theories underlying perceived changes in teaching and learning after installing a computer network in a secondary school,” British Journal of Educational Technology 30(1) (1999): 25-41
66. S. Yildirim, “Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: a discussion and analysis of attitudes and use,” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 32(4) (2000): 479-495.
67. N. B. Adams, “Educational Computing Concerns of Postsecondary Faculty,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(3) (2002): 284-303.
68. L.E. Gueldenzoph, S. Guidera, et al., “Faculty Use of Instructional Technology in the University Classroom,” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 28 (2)(1999):121-135.
69. J. B. Singer, D. Craig, et al, “Attitudes of Professors and Students about New Media Technology,’’ Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 51(2) (1996): 36-45.
70. S. A. Kuehn, “Computer-Mediated Communication in Instructional Settings: A Research Agenda,” Communication Education 43(2) (1994): 171-183.