Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness

Computers and Education

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 11-25

  Chou, Huey Wen ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Country specific developments; Gender studies; Improving classroom teaching; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035427284     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00028-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baldwin T.T. Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 77(2):1992;147-154.
2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. 1986;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Chou H.W., Wang Y.F. The effects of learning style and training method on computer attitude and performance in WWW page design training. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 21(3):1999;323-342.
4. Chou H.W., Wang T.B. The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management. 2001;. in press.
5. Christoph R.T., Schoenfeld G.A. Jr., Tansky J.W. Overcoming barriers to training utilizing technology: the influence of self-efficacy factors on multimedia-based training receptiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 9(1):1998;25-38.
6. Coffin R.J., MacIntyre P.D. Motivational influences on computer-related affect states. Computers in Human Behavior. 15:1999;549-569.
7. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research. 6(2):1995;118-143.
8. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A., Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology. A longitudinal study MIS Quarterly. 23(2):1999;145-158.
9. Gist M.E., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74:1989;884-891.
10. Gist M.E., Stevens C.K., Bavetta A.G. Effects of self-efficacy and post training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology. 44:1991;837-861.
11. Goldstein I.L., Musicante G.R. The applicability of a training transfer model to issues concerning rater training. Locke E.A. Generalizing from laboratory to field setting. 1986;83-98 Lexington, Lexington, MA.
12. Grover V., Teng T.C. Facilitating the implementation of customer-based inter-organizational systems. an empirical analysis of innovation and support factors Information Systems Journal. 4:1994;61-89.
13. Harrison A.W., Rainer R.K. Jr. The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems. 9(1):1992;93-111.
14. Horton, W. L., Taylor, A. L., Ignacio, A. & Hoft, N. L. (1996). The web page design cookbook (pp. 31-50). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Igbaria M., Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega. 23(6):1995;587-605.
16. Knight, C. B., Halpin, G. & Halpin, G. (1997). The effects of learning environment accommodations on the achievement of second graders. Research in the Schools, 3(2), 9-14.
17. Lee S.M., Kim Y.R., Lee J. An empirical study of the relationships among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems. 12(2):1995;189-202.
18. Lipsky, S. A. (1989). Effect of field independence/dependence on two textbook notetaking techniques. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 983).
19. Liu M., Reed W.M. The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior. 10(4):1994;419-434.
20. Martocchio J.J. Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(6):1994;819-825.
21. Moore, D. M. & Dwyer, F. M. (1992). Effects of color coding on cognitive style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Education Research Association, Hilton Head, SC.
22. Murphy C.A., Coover D., Owen S.V. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49:1989;893-899.
23. Olfman L., Mandviwalla M. Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces. a longitudinal field experiment Management Information Systems Quarterly. 18:1994;405-426.
24. Páramo M.F., Tinajero C. Field dependence/independence and performance in school: an argument against neutrality of cognitive style. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 70:1990;1079-1087.
25. Rattanapian V., Gibbs W. Computerized drill and practice. design options and learner characteristics International Journal of Instructional Media. 22(1):1995;59-77.
26. Simon S.J., Grover V., Teng J.T.C., Whitcomb K. The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end-user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer. a longitudinal field study Information Systems Research. 7(4):1996;466-490.
27. Simon S.J., Werner J.M. Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches. a field experiment Journal of Applied Psychology. 81(6):1996;648-659.
28. Snow R.E. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 59(2):1991;205-216.
29. Snow R.E., Swanson J. Instructional psychology. aptitude, adaptation, and assessment Annual Review of Psychology. 43:1992;583-626.
30. Tinajero C., Páramo M.F. Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 67:1997;199-212.
31. Torkzadeh G., Koufteros X. Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational & Psychological Measurement. 54(3):1994;813-821.
32. Webster J., Martocchio J.J. Turning work into play. implications for microcomputer software training Journal of Management. 19(1):1993;127-146.
33. Wieseman R.A., Portis S.C., Simpson F.M. An analysis of the relationship between cognitive styles and grades. new perspectives on success or failure of preservice education majors College Student Journal. 26(4):1992;512-517.
34. Witkin H.A. Origins of cognitive style. Scheerer C. Cognition: theory, research, promise. 1964;172-205 Harper and Row, New York.
35. Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R. Cognitive style: essence and origins. 1981;International Universities Press, New York.
36. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A., Goodenough D.R., Cox P.W. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research. 47:1977;1-64.
37. Witkin H.A., Oltman P., Raskin E., Karp S. A manual for the embedded figures test. 1971;Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA.
38. Whiteley B.E. Jr. Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. 13(1):1997;1-22.