Use of the Internet in the Public Relations Curriculum

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 81-92

  Gower, Karla K ^a   Cho, Jung Yul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009909732     PISSN: 10776958     EISSN: 21614326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107769580105600207     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams B., (1999, November). Ask the professor. Public Relations Tactics 3.
2. Barks E. J., (1999, November). High Tech — A Change Agent for Public Relations? Public Relations Tactics, 24–25.
3. Bloom J., (1999, March). Ten reasons why PR is entering a golden age. PR Week p. 12.
4. Commission on Public Relations Education. (1999, October). A port of entry: Public relations education for the 21st century.
5. Curtin P. A., Witherspoon E. M., (1999). Computer Skills Integration in Public Relations Curricula. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 54, 23–34.
6. Esrock S. L., Leichty G. B., (1998). Social responsibility and corporate Web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24, 305–319.
7. Gawlick G., (2001, February 14). Online PR basics: How little things can make a big difference. PR Professional Daily [Online serial]. Available: http://ww.coolsheets.com/pr/prmonth.htm.
8. Geibel J. P., (1999, November). How digital tools and audiences are changing high-tech PR. Public Relations Tactics, 5, 18.
9. Grunig J., Hunt T, (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Grupp R., (2000). Public relatons must control the Web site. The Public Relations Strategist, 6(1), 30–35.
11. Harris T. L., Novick R., (1999, September 1). Public relations budgets grew 24% in 1999; biggest gains in work assigned to agencies. Thomas L. Harris/Impulse Research Corporation. Available: http://www.cyberpulse.com/harris/press.html.
12. Heath R. L., (1998). New Communication Technologies: An Issue Management Point of View. Public Relations Review, 24, 273–288.
13. Hill L. N., White C., (2000). Public Relations Practitioners' Perception of the World Wide Web as a Communications Tool. Public Relations Review, 26, 31–51.
14. Holtz S., (1999). Public Relations on the Net. New York: AMACOM.
15. Independent PR Practitioners Network. (1999, September). Ten things PR people should understand about the Internet and their professional practice. Available: http://www.prheadquarters.com.
16. Kent M. L., Taylor M., (1998). Building Dialogic Relationships Through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24, 321–334.
17. Kiesler S., Sproull L. S., (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402–413.
18. Kruckeberg D., (1998, Summer). The future of PR education: Some recommendations. Public Relations Review, 24, 235–249.
19. Leslie J., (n.d.) BSMG Worldwide White Paper. Available (August 2001) at http://www.bsmgworldwide.com/hot/white.htm.
20. National Communication Association. (1998, July). Dialogue on Public Relations Education: Curriculum Task Team Report.
21. Ochman B. L., (2000). The “death” of the traditional press release. The Public Relations Strategist, 6(2), 16, 18.
22. Pavlik J. V., (1999, June). The Public Relations Perspective. Institute for Public Relations. Available: http://www.instituteforpr.com/research/Pavlik_P1.htm.
23. Ryan M., (1999, Fall). Practitioners and the World Wide Web: Involvement in Web sites is crucial. Public Relations Quarterly, 29–31.
24. Spataro M., (1998, August). Net relations: A fusion of direct marketing and public relations. Direct Marketing, 61, 16–20.
25. White C., Raman N., (1999). The World Wide Web as a Public Relations Medium: The Use of Research, Planning, and Evaluation in Web Site Development. Public Relations Review, 25, 405–419.
26. Wright D. K., (1998). Corporate Communications Policy Concerning the Internet. A Survey of the Nation's Senior-Level Corporate Public Relations Officers. Available (August, 2001): http://www.instituteforpr.com/research/wriNEW_Pg1.htm