Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation needs of students with disabilities

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 267-281

  Bricout, John C ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035633993     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2001.10779053     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alperin, D. E. (1988). The physically disabled BSW student: Implications for field education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 2(2), 99-111.
2. Anderson, M. (1996). Using computer-mediated conferencing to facilitate group projects in an educational psychology course. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 351-353.
3. Armstrong, A. J., & Wilkinson, M. R. (1998). Assistive technology from a user’s perspective. In P. Wehman & J. Kregel (Eds.), More than a job: Securing satisfying careers for people with disabilities (pp. 225-246). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
4. Blanchard, A., & Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 16, 293-307.
5. Burgstahler, S. E. (1995). Distance learning and the information highway. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 19, 271-276.
6. Cole, B. S., & Cain, M. W. (1996). Social work students with disabilities: A proactive approach to accommodation. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 339-349.
7. Cole, B. S., Chirst, C. C., & Light, T. R. (1995). Social work education and students with disabilities: Implications of Section 504 and the ADA. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 262-268.
8. Cwikel, J. G., & Cnaan, R. A. (1991). Ethical dilemmas in applying second-wave information technology to social work practice. Social Work, 36, 114-121.
9. Daly, J. (2000). World Wide Web Consortium works to bridge “digital divide”: Web accessibility initiative director presenting at White House digital divide event [Online]. Available at http://www/w3org/2000/09/wai-whitehouse.
10. Faux, T. L., & Black-Hughes, C. (2000). A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 454-466.
11. Finn, J. (2000). A survey of domestic violence organizations on the Worldwide Web. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(1), 83-102.
12. Finn, J., & Smith, M. (1997). The use of the World Wide Web by undergraduate social work education programs. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 3(1), 71-84.
13. Gilson, S. F., Bricout, J. C., & Baskind, F. R. (1998). Listening to the voices of individuals with disabilities. Families in Society, 79, 188-196.
14. Hadjadi, D., Bouzidi, A., & Burger, D. (1998). Making the Internet accessible to the visually handicapped. In S. Sprigle (Ed.), The state of the arts and science: Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America 1998 Annual Conference. Minneapolis, MN: RENSA Press.
15. Hantula, D. A. (1998). The virtual industrial/organizational psychology class: Learning and teaching in cyberspace in three iterations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 205-216.
16. Hastings, R. P., Sjoestroem, K. E., & Stevenage, S. V. (1998). Swedish and English adolescents’ attitudes toward the community presence of people with disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42(3), 246-253.
17. Haythornwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1101-1114.
18. Henrickson, M., & Mayo, J. R. (2000). The HIV Cybermall: A regional cybernetwork of HIV services. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(1), 7-26.
19. Holden, G., Bearison, D.J., Rode, D. C., Kapiloff, M. F., & Rosenberg, G. (2000). The effects of a computer network on pediatric pain and anxiety. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(1), 27-47.
20. James, P., & Thomas, M. (1996). Deconstructing a disabling environment in social work education. Social Work Education, 15(1), 34-45.
21. Johnson, M. M., & Huff, M. T. (2000). Students’ use of computer-mediated communication in a distance education course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 519-532.
22. Kapperman, G., Hahn, S., Heinze, T., & Dalton, S. M. (1997). Project vision: Visually impaired students and Internet opportunities now. Sycamore, IT: Research Development Institute.
23. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopahyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
24. Krantz, J. H., & Eagley, B. M. (1996). Creating psychological tutorials on the World Wide Web. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 156-160.
25. Lathrop, D. (1996). Mentoring by modem: The do-it program uses the Internet to nurture a new generation of disabled scientists. Mainstream, 21(2), 25-27.
26. Latting, J. K. (1994). Diffusion of computermediated communication in a graduate social work class: Lessons from “the class from hell.” Computers in Human Services, 10(3), 21-45.
27. Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1996). People with disabilities and social work: Historical and contemporary issues. Social Work, 4, 7-14.
28. Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1999). Disability: A diversity model approach in human service practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. Madden, R. G. (1995). Disability law and undergraduate social work education: Practicing what we preach. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 7(1), 71-83.
30. Marlowe-Carr, L. C. (1997). Social workers online: A profile. Computers in Human Services, 14(1), 59-70.
31. Marson, S. M. (1997). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in Human Services, 14(2), 35-49.
32. Marson, S. M., Cogswell, D., & Smith, M. L. (1994). Commonly asked questions about electronic communication and computer networking. The New Social Worker, 1(2), 12-15.
33. Murphy, K. L., & Collins, M. P. (1997, November 3). Communication conventions in instructional electronic chats. First Monday [Online serial], 2(11). Available at http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_ll/index.html.
34. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2000). The NIST rotating-wheel based refreshable Braille display [Online]. Available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div895/isis/projects/Braille.
35. New guidelines aim to make Web pages accessible to disabled. (1998, February 13) The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A29.
36. Nurius, P. S. (1995). Critical thinking: A metaskill for integrating practice and information technology training. Computers in Human Services, 12(1/2), 109-126.
37. Rattock, J. (1994). Computer training in cognitive remediation of the traumatic head injured. In W.L. Zagler, G. Busby, & R. R. Wagner (Eds.), Computers for Handicapped Persons. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Rosen, E. F., & Petty, L. C. (1995). The Internet and sexuality education: Tapping into the wild side. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 281-284.
39. Schoech, D. (2000). Teaching over the Internet: Results of one doctoral course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 467-486.
40. Scott, S. S. (1994). Determining reasonable academic adjustments for college students with learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 403-412.
41. Southard, P. A. D. (1997). Expanding horizons: Electronic communication and classroom teaching in sociology. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 427-430.
42. Stafford, L., Kline, S. L., & Dimmick, J. (1999). Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 659-669.
43. Stewart, J., & Williams, R. (1998). The coevolution of society and multimedia technology: Issues in predicting the future innovation and use of ubiquitous technology. Social Science Computer Review, 16, 268-282.
44. Strange, C., & Alston, L. (1998). Voicing differences: Encouraging multicultural learning. Journal of College Student Development, 39(1), 87-99.
45. Stocks, J. T., & Freddolino, P. P. (2000). Enhancing computer-mediated teaching through interactivity: The second iteration of a World Wide Web-based graduate social work course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 505-518.
46. Tom, G. (1998). Faculty and student perceptions of classroom etiquette. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 515-517.
47. Visser, A. (1995). Computers in education: Added value leading toward better quality. Computers in Human Services, 12(1/2), 99-108.
48. Weinberg, L. K. (1978). Unique learning needs of physically handicapped social work students. Journal of Education for Social Work, 14(1), 110-117.
49. Weinberg, N. (1996). Compassion by computer: Contrasting the supportiveness of computermediated and face-to-face interactions. Computers in Human Services, 13(2), 51-63.
50. Weinberg, N., Schmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: Cancer patients in a computer-mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 21(1), 24-29.
51. Wellman, B., & Hampton, K. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6), 648-654.
52. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Carton, L., Guila, M., & Haythornwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
53. Wernet, S. P., Olliges, R. H., & Delicath, T. A. (2000). Postcourse evaluation of WebCT (Web Course Tools) classes by social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 487-504.
54. Wisor, D., Miller, M. A., & Kreutzer, J. S. (1998). Brain injury online: Assessing and using the Internet for consumers and healthcare professionals. NeuroRehabilitation, 10, 67-73.
55. Young, J. R. (1998, March 13). For students with disabilities, the Web can be like a classroom without a ramp. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A31.