Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice

American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Volumn 299, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Glendinning, J I ^a   Beltran, F ^a   Benton, L ^a   Cheng, S ^a   Gieseke, J ^a   Gillman, J ^a   Spain, H N ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chorda tympani; Licking; Postoral stimulation; Sweet taste

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; SACCHARIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CALORIE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CHORDA TYMPANI; LICKING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEETNESS; TASTE; TASTE PREFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHORDA TYMPANI NERVE; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; SACCHARIN; SOLUTIONS; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE;

EID: 78149489355     PISSN: 03636119     EISSN: 15221490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00331.2010     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ackroff K. Learned flavor preferences. The variable potency of post-oral nutrient reinforcers. Appetite 51: 743-746, 2008.
2. Ackroff K, Yiin YM, Sclafani A. Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol Behav 99: 402-411, 2010.
3. Bachmanov AA, Beauchamp GK. Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Physiol Behav 93: 37-43, 2008.
4. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 26: 905-913, 2001.
5. Berkey CS, Rockett HRH, Field AE, Gillman MW, Colditz GA. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes Res 12: 778-788, 2004.
6. Berthoud HR. Mind versus metabolism in the control of food intake and energy balance. Physiol Behav 81: 781-793, 2004.
7. Booth DA. Feeding inhibition by glucose loads, compared between normal and diabetic. Physiol Behav 8: 801-805, 1972.
8. Boudreau JC, Do LT, Sivakumar L, Oravec J, Rodriguez CA. Taste systems of the petrosal ganglion of the rat glossopharyngeal nerve. Chem Senses 12: 437-458, 1987.
9. Bray GA, Nielson SJ, Opokin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 79: 537-543, 2004.
10. Cabanac M, Johnson KG. Analysis of a conflict between palatability and cold exposure in rats. Physiol Behav 31: 249-253, 1983. (Pubitemid 13048043)
11. Cantor MB, Eichler RJ. Sweetness - a supernormal reinforcer. Chemtech 7: 214-216, 1977.
12. Capretta PJ. Saccharin and saccharin-glucose ingestion in two inbred strains of Mus musculus. Psychon Sci 21: 133-135, 1970.
13. Cheal M. Taste responses of the chorda tympani nerve in the mouse. Physiol Behav 19: 175-177, 1977.
14. Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Pérez CA, Shigemura N, Yoshida R, Mosinger B, Glendinning JI, Ninomiya Y, Margolskee RF. Trpm5 null mice respond to bitter, sweet and umami compounds. Chem Senses 31: 253-264, 2006.
15. Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Varadarajan V, Zou S, Jiang P, Ninomiya Y, Margolskee RF. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1R3. Science 301: 850-853, 2003.
16. Davis JD, Collins BJ, Levine MW. Peripheral control of drinking: gastrointestinal filling as a negative feedback signal, a theoretical and experimental analysis. J Comp Physiol Psychol 89: 985-1002, 1975.
17. Davis JD, Levine MW. A model for the control of ingestion. Psychol Rev 84: 379-412, 1977.
18. Davis JD, Smith GP, Singh B. Type of negative feedback controlling sucrose ingestions depends on sucrose concentration. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: R383-R389, 2000.
19. de Araujo IE, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Sotnikova TD, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG, Nicolelis MAL, Simon SA. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 57: 930-941, 2008.
20. DuBois GE. Unraveling the biochemistry of sweet and umami tastes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13972-13973, 2004.
21. El-Ghundi M, O'Dowd BF, Erclik M, George SR. Attenuation of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci 17: 851-862, 2003.
22. Engelstoft MS, Egerod KL, Holst B, Schwartz TW. A gut feeling for obesity: 7TM sensors on enteroendocrine cells. Cell Metab 8: 447-449, 2008.
23. Finger TE, Danilova V, Barrows J, Bartel DL, Vigers AJ, Stone L, Hellekant G, Kinnamon SC. ATP signaling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves. Science 310: 1495-1499, 2005.
24. Flaherty CF, Coppotelli C, Grigson PS, Mitchell C, Flaherty JE. Investigation of the devaluation intepretation of anticipatory negative contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 21: 229-247, 1995.
25. Flaherty CF, Mitchell C. Absolute and relative rewarding properties of fructose, glucose, and saccharin mixtures as reflected in anticipatory contrast. Physiol Behav 66: 841-853, 1999.
26. Formaker BK, Stapleton JR, Roper SD, Frank ME. Responses of the rat chorda tympani nerve to glutamate-sucrose mixtures. Chem Senses 29: 473-482, 2004.
27. Glendinning JI, Bloom LD, Onishi M, Zheng KH, Damak S, Margolskee RF, Spector AC. Contribution of α-gustducin to taste-guided licking responses of mice. Chem Senses 30: 299-316, 2005. (Pubitemid 41158349)
28. Glendinning JI, Chyou S, Lin I, Onishi M, Patel P, Zheng KH. Initial licking responses of mice to sweeteners: effects of Tas1r3 polymorphisms. Chem Senses 30: 601-614, 2005.
29. Glendinning JI, Gresack J, Spector AC. A high-throughput screening procedure for identifying mice with aberrant taste and oromotor function. Chem Senses 27: 461-474, 2002.
30. Gosnell BA, Levine AS. Reward systems and food intake: role of opioids. Int J Obes (Lond) 33 Suppl 2: S54-S58, 2009.
31. Grigson PS, Spector AC, Norgren R. Microstructural analysis of successive negative contrast in free-feeding and deprived rats. Physiol Behav 54: 909-916, 1993.
32. Inoue M, Glendinning JI, Theodorides ML, Harkness S, Li X, Bosak N, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice. Physiol Genomics 32: 82-94, 2007.
33. Inoue M, McCaughey SA, Bachmanov AA, Beauchamp GK. Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57Bl/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 26: 915-923, 2001.
34. Levin BE. Factors promoting and ameliorating the development of obesity. Physiol Behav 86: 633-639, 2005.
35. McCleary RA. Taste and post-ingestion factors in specific-hunger behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol 46: 411-421, 1953.
36. Meyer JH, Hlinka M, Tabrizi Y, Dimaso N, Raybould HE. Chemical specificities and intestinal distributions of nutrient-driven satiety. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R1293-R1307, 1998.
37. Morini G, Bassoli A, Temussi PA. From small sweeteners to sweet proteins: anatomy of the binding sites of the human T1R2-T1R3 receptor. J Med Chem 48: 5520-5529, 2005.
38. Myers KP, Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis. Physiol Behav 74: 481-493, 2001. (Pubitemid 34076594)
39. Myers KP, Sclafani A. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. II. Taste reactivity analysis. Physiol Behav 74: 495-505, 2001. (Pubitemid 34076595)
40. Ninomiya Y, Hellekant G. Enhancing effects of saccharin on gustatory responses to o-phenylalanine in monkey single chorda tympani fibers. Brain Res 635: 335-338, 1994.
41. Ninomiya Y, Kajiura H. Enhancement of murine gustatory neural responses to D-amino acids by saccharin. Brain Res 626: 287-294, 1993.
42. Nissenbaum JW, Sclafani A. Sham-feeding response of rats to polycose and sucrose. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 11: 215-222, 1987.
43. Norgren R, Hajnal A, Mungarndee SS. Gustatory reward and the nucleus accumbens. Physiol Behav 89: 521-535, 2006.
44. Ohkuri T, Yasumatsu K, Horio N, Jyotaki M, Margolskee RF, Ninomiya Y. Multiple sweet receptors and transduction pathways revealed in knockout mice by temperature dependence and gurmarin sensitivity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296: R960-R971, 2009.
45. Peciña S, Cagniard B, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW, Zhuang X. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher "wanting" but not "liking" for sweet rewards. J Neurosci 23: 9395-9402, 2003.
46. Phillips RJ, Powley TL. Gastric volume rather than nutrient content inhibits food intake. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 271: R766-R779, 1996. (Pubitemid 126757665)
47. Ramirez I. Why do sugars taste good? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 14: 125-134, 1990.
48. Riera CE, Vogel H, Simon SA, Damak S, le Coutre J. The capsaicin receptor participates in artificial sweetener aversion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376: 653-657, 2008.
49. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Carr BT, Losee ML, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG. Investigation of synergism in binary mixtures of sweeteners. Brain Res Bull 38: 105-120, 1995.
50. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292: 927-934, 2004.
51. Schwartz GJ. The role of gastrointestinal vagal afferents in the control of food intake: current prospects. Nutrition 16: 866-873, 2000.
52. Sclafani A. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides. Physiol Behav 87: 745-756, 2006.
53. Sclafani A. Oral and postoral determinants of food reward. Physiol Behav 81: 773-779, 2004.
54. Sclafani A, Ackroff K, Schwartz GJ. Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients. Physiol Behav 78: 285-294, 2003.
55. Sclafani A, Bahrani M, Zukerman S, Ackroff K. Stevia and saccharin preference in rats and mice. Chem Senses 35: 433-443, 2010.
56. Sclafani A, Cardieri C, Tucker K, Blusk D, Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 265: R320-R325, 1993.
57. Sclafani A, Fanizza LJ, Azzara A. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose and fructose in rats. Physiol Behav 67: 227-234, 1999.
58. Sclafani A, Glendinning JI. Flavor preferences conditioned in C57BL/6 mice by intragastric carbohydrate self-infusion. Physiol Behav 79: 783-788, 2003. (Pubitemid 37087975)
59. Sclafani A, Glendinning JI. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 289: R712-R720, 2005.
60. Sclafani A, Lucas F. Abdominal vagotomy does not block carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiol Behav 60: 447-453, 1996.
61. Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF. Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of α-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 293: R1504-R1513, 2007.
62. Shigemura N, Ohkuri T, Sadamitsu C, Yasumatsu K, Yoshida R, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA, Ninomiya Y. Amiloride-sensitive NaCl taste responses are associated with genetic variation of ENaC α-subunit in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294: R66-R75, 2008.
63. Smith JC. Microstructure of the rat's intake of food, sucrose, saccharin in 24-hr tests. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24: 199-212, 2000.
64. Smith JC, Davis JD, O'Keefe GB. Lack of an order effect in brief contact taste tests with closely spaced test trials. Physiol Behav 52: 1107-1111, 1992.
65. Smith JC, Williams DP, Jue SH. Rapid oral mixing of glucose and saccharin by rats. Science 191: 304-305, 1976.
66. Spector AC, Glendinning JI. Linking peripheral taste processes to behavior. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19: 370-377, 2009.
67. Spector AC, Redman R, Garcea M. The consequences of gustatory nerve transection on taste-guided licking of sucrose and maltose in the rat. Behav Neurosci 110: 1096-1109, 1996.
68. Spector AC, Travers SP. The representation of taste quality in the mammalian taste system. Behav Cogn Neuro Rev 4: 143-191, 2005.
69. Sternini C, Anselmia L, Rozengurt E. Enteroendocrine cells: a site of "taste" in gastrointestinal chemosensing. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 15: 73-78, 2008.
70. Tsurugizawa T, Kondoh T, Torii K. Forebrain activation induced by postoral nutritive substances in rats. Neuroreport 19: 1111-1115, 2008.
71. Valenstein ES, Cox VC, Kakolewski JW. Polydipsia elicited by the synergistic action of a saccharin and glucose solution. Science 157: 552-554, 1967.
72. Vigorito M, Sclafani A, Jacquin MF. Effects of gustatory deafferentation on Polycose and sucrose appetite in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 11: 201-209, 1987.
73. Walls EK, Phillips RJ, Wang FB, Holst MC, Powley TL. Suppression of meal size by intestinal nutrients is eliminated by celiac vagal deafferentation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 269: R1410-R1419, 1995.
74. Weijnen JAWM, Surink S, Verstralen MJM, Moerkerken A, De Bree GJ, Bley RLAW. Main trajectories of nerves that traverse and surround the tympanic cavity in the rat. J Anat 197: 247-262, 2000.
75. Wellendorph P, Johansen LD, Bräuner-Osborne H. Molecular pharmacology of promiscuous seven transmembrane receptors sensing organic nutrients. Mol Pharmacol 76: 453-465, 2009.
76. Wong GT, Gannon KS, Margolskee RF. Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. Nature 381: 796-800, 1996.
77. Zhao GQ, Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Erlenbach I, Ryba NJP, Zuker CS. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 115: 255-266, 2003. (Pubitemid 37487700)
78. Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296: R866-R876, 2009.
79. Zukerman S, Touzani K, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. Role of olfaction in the conditioned sucrose preference of sweet-ageusic T1R3 knockout mice. Chem Senses 34: 685-694, 2009.