Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 93, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 37-43

  Bachmanov, Alexander A ^a   Beauchamp, Gary K ^a  

^a MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Appetite; Consumption; Genetics; Inbred mice; Intake; Nutrient; Sweet; Taste

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; SWEETENING AGENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; C57BL MOUSE; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCE; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASTE ACUITY;

AMINO ACIDS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; NUTRITIVE VALUE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE THRESHOLD;

EID: 42449160306     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Belknap JK, Crabbe JC, Young ER. Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1993;112:503-10.
2. Capeless CG, Whitney G. The genetic basis of preference for sweet substances among inbred strains of mice: preference ratio phenotypes and the alleles of the Sac and dpa loci. Chem Senses 1995;20:291-8.
3. Lush IE. The genetics of tasting in mice. VI. Saccharin, acesulfame, dulcin and sucrose. Genet Res 1989;53:95-9.
4. Kotlus BS, Blizard DA. Measuring gustatory variation in mice: a shortterm fluid-intake test. Physiol Behav 1998;64:37-47.
5. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 2001;26:905-13.
6. Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Tordoff MG, Price RA, Beauchamp GK. Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/ J mice. Physiol Behav 2001;72:603-13.
7. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis. J Nutr 2000;130:935S-41S.
8. Reed DR, Li S, Li X, et al. Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains. J Neurosci 2004;24:938-46.
9. Smith BK, Andrews PK,West DB. Macronutrient diet selection in thirteen mouse strains. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000;278: R797-805.
10. Lewis SR, Ahmed S, Dym C, Khaimova E, Kest B, Bodnar RJ. Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake. Physiol Behav 2005;85:546-56.
11. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996;20:201-6.
12. Sclafani A. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences. Physiol Behav 2007;90:602-11.
13. Sclafani A. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides. Physiol Behav 2006;87:745-56.
14. Sclafani A. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking. Physiol Behav 2006;87:734-44.
15. Sclafani A, Glendinning JI. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005;289:R712-20.
16. Lush IE, Hornigold N, King P, Stoye JP. The genetics of tasting in mice. VII. Glycine revisited, and the chromosomal location of Sac and Soa. Genet Res 1995;66:167-74.
17. Hayakawa Y, Kawai M. Taste properties of L-amino acid solutions at suprathreshold concentration. Jpn J Taste Smell Res 2003;10:463-6.
18. Schiffman SS, Sennewald K, Gagnon J. Comparison of taste qualities and thresholds of D-and L-amino acids. Physiol Behav 1981;27:51-9.
19. Ninomiya T, Ikeda S, Yamaguchi S, Yoshikawa T. Tastes of various amino acids (in Japanese). Stat Quality Control 1966;17:69-73.
20. Wieser H, Jugel H, Belitz HD. Relationships between structure and sweet taste of amino acids (in German). Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 1977;164:277-82.
21. Shallenberger RS. Taste Chemistry. London, UL: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1993. p. 613.
22. Tapper DN, Halpern BP. Taste stimuli: a behavioral categorization. Science 1968;161:708-10.
23. Kasahara T, Iwasaki K, Sato M. Taste effectiveness of some D-and Lamino acids in mice. Physiol Behav 1987;39:619-24.
24. Pritchard TC, Scott TR. Amino acids as taste stimuli. I. Neural and behavioral attributes. Brain Res 1982;253:81-92.
25. Pritchard TC, Scott TR. Amino acids as taste stimuli. II. Quality coding. Brain Res 1982;253:93-104.
26. Iwasaki K, Kasahara T, Sato M. Gustatory effectiveness of amino acids in mice: behavioral and neurophysiological studies. Physiol Behav 1985;34:531-42.
27. Ninomiya Y, Mizukoshi T, Higashi T, Katsukawa H, Funakoshi M. Gustatory neural responses in three different strains of mice. Brain Res 1984;302:305-14.
28. Ninomiya Y, Higashi T, Katsukawa H, Mizukoshi T, Funakoshi M. Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice. Brain Res 1984;322:83-92.
29. Manita S, Bachmanov AA, Li X, Beauchamp GK, Inoue M. Is glycine "sweet" to mice? Mouse strain differences in perception of glycine taste. Chem Senses 2006;31:785-93.
30. Breslin PA, Kemp S, Beauchamp GK. Single sweetness signal. Nature 1994;369:447-8.
31. Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK, Pugh Jr EN. Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose. Percept Psychophys 1996;58:327-41.
32. Ramirez I. Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats. Physiol Behav 1994;55:355-60.
33. Nissenbaum JW, Sclafani A. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1987;11:187-96.
34. Giza BK, Scott TR, Sclafani A, Antonucci RF. Polysaccharides as taste stimuli: their effect in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat. Brain Res 1991;555:1-9.
35. Sako N, Shimura T, Komure M, Mochizuki R, Matsuo R, Yamamoto T. Differences in taste responses to Polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Physiol Behav 1994;56:741-5.
36. Tordoff MG, Bachmanov AA. Monell Mouse Taste Phenotyping Project; 2001. http://www.monell.org/MMTPP/.
37. Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Beauchamp GK, Tordoff MG. Food intake, water intake, and drinking spout side preference of 28 mouse strains. Behav Genet 2002;32:435-43.
38. Spector AC. Psychophysical evaluation of taste function in nonhuman mammals. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation. 2nd. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 861-79.
39. Bufe B, Breslin PA, Kuhn C, et al. The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Curr Biol 2005;15:322-7.
40. Inoue M, McCaughey SA, Bachmanov AA, Beauchamp GK. Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses 2001;26:915-23.
41. Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, et al. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science 2003;301:850-3.
42. Zhao GQ, Zhang Y, Hoon MA, et al. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 2003;115:255-66.
43. Inoue M, Glendinning JI, Theodorides ML, Harkness S, Li X, Bosak N, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice. Submitted for publication.
44. Inoue M, Reed DR, Li X, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects behavioral and neural taste responses to sweeteners in the F2 hybrids between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. J Neurosci 2004;24:2296-303.
45. Schiffman SS, Gatlin CA. Sweeteners: state of knowledge review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1993;17:313-45.
46. Sclafani A. Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite. Physiol Behav 2006;89:525-30.
47. Bachmanov AA, Li X, Reed DR, et al. Positional cloning of the mouse saccharin preference (Sac) locus. Chem Senses 2001;26:925-33.
48. Boughter JD, Bachmanov AA. Behavioral genetics and taste. BMC Neuroscience. In press.
49. Bachmanov AA. Genetic architecture of sweet taste. In: Weerasinghe DK, DuBois GE, editors. Sweetness and Sweeteners: Biology, Chemistry and Psychophysics. ACS symposium series. Oxford University Press; In press.