Abdominal vagotomy does not block carbohydrate-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 447-453

  Sclafani, Anthony ^a   Lucas, François ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Intragastric conditioning; Oral conditioning; Polycose

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE POLYMER;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INTRAGASTRIC DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TASTE ACUITY; TASTE AVERSION; TASTE PREFERENCE; VAGOTOMY; VAGUS NERVE;

EID: 0030220069     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00049-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. 1. Ackroff, K.; Sclafani, A. Flavor preferences conditioned by sugars: Rats learn to prefer glucose over fructose. Physiol. Behav. 50:815-824; 1991.
2. 2. Anil, M. H.; Forbes, J. M. The roles of hepatic nerves in the reduction of food intake as a consequence of intraportal sodium propionate administration in sheep. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 73:539-546; 1988.
3. 3. Deutsch, J. A.; Jang Ahn, S. The splanchnic nerve and food intake regulation. Behav. Neural Biol. 45:43-47; 1986.
4. 4. Elizalde, G.; Sclafani, A. Starch-based conditioned flavor preferences in rats: Influence of taste, calories, and CS-US delay. Appetite 11:179-200; 1988.
5. 5. Elizalde, G.; Sclafani, A. Fat appetite in rats: Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and nonnutritive oil emulsions. Appetite 15:189-197; 1990.
6. 6. Elizalde, G.; Sclafani, A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric Polycose: A detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation. Physiol. Behav. 47:63-77; 1990.
7. 7. Gowans, S. E.; Weingarten, H. P. Elevations of plasma glucose do not support taste-to-postingestive consequence learning. Am. J. Physiol. 261:R1409-R1417; 1991.
8. 8. Horn, C. C.; Mitchell, J. C.; Martinson, F. A. The effects of selective vagotomy on conditioned flavor-nutrient preferences in rats. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 19:8161993.
9. 9. Joyner, K.; Smith, G. P.; Gibbs, J. Abdominal vagotomy decreases the satiating potency of CCK-8 in sham and real feeding. Am. J. Physiol. 264:R912-R916; 1993.
10. 10. Martin, J. R.; Rogers, R. C.; Novin, D.; Vanderweele, D. A. Excessive gastric retention by vagotomized rats and rabbits given a solid diet. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 10:291-294; 1977.
11. 11. Mather, P.; Nicolaidis, S.; Booth, D. A. Compensatory and conditioned feeding responses to scheduled glucose infusions in the rat. Nature 273:461-463; 1978.
12. 12. Pérez, C.; Lucas, F.; Sclafani, A. Carbohydrate, fat and protein condition similar flavor preferences in rats using an oral-delay conditioning procedure. Physiol. Behav. 57:549-554; 1995.
13. 13. Pérez, C.; Sclafani, A. Cholecystokinin conditions flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 260:R179-R185; 1991.
14. 14. Revusky, S. H.; Smith, M. H., Jr.; Chalmers, D. V. Flavor preference: Effects of ingestion-contingent intravenous saline or glucose. Physiol. Behav. 6:341-343; 1971.
15. 15. Schmitt, M. Influences of hepatic portal receptors on hypothalamic feeding and satiety centers. Am. J. Physiol. 225:1089-1095; 1973.
16. 16. Sclafani, A. Nutritionally based learned flavor preferences in rats. In: Capaldi, E. D.; Powley, T. L., eds. Taste, experience, and feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1990:139-156.
17. 17. Sclafani, A.; Ackroff, K. Glucose-and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: Taste vs. postingestive conditioning. Physiol. Behav. 56:399-405; 1994.
18. 18. Sclafani, A.; Cardieri, C.; Tucker, K.; Blusk, D.; Ackroff, K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 265:R320-R325; 1993.
19. 19. Sclafani, A.; Kramer, T. H. Dietary selection in vagotomized rats. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 9:247-258; 1983.
20. 20. Sengupta, J. N.; Gebhart, G. F. Gastrointestinal afferent fibers and sensation. In: Johnson, L. R., ed. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract, 3rd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994:483-519.
21. 21. Simons, E. A.; Martinson, F. A.; Watson, E. A.; Horn, C. C.; Mitchell, J. C. Effects of hepatic-celiac branch vagotomy and site of Polycose infusion on conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20:1224; 1994.
22. 22. Smith, G. P.; Jerome, C. Effects of total and selective abdominal vagotomies on water intake in rats. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 9:259-271; 1983.
23. 23. Snowdon, C. T. Gastrointestinal sensory and motor control of food intake. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 71:68-76; 1970.
24. 24. Tordoff, M. G. Metabolic basis of learned food preferences. In: Friedman, M. I.; Tordoff, M. G.; Kare, M. R., eds. Appetite and nutrition. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1991:239-260.
25. 25. Tordoff, M. G.; Friedman, M. I. Hepatic-portal glucose infusions decrease food intake and increase food preference. Am. J. Physiol. 251:R192-R196; 1986.
26. 26. Tordoff, M. G.; Friedman, M. I. Drinking saccharin increases food intake and preference - IV. Cephalic phase and metabolic factors. Appetite 12:37-56; 1989.
27. 27. Tordoff, M. G.; Ulrich, P. M.; Sandler, F. Flavor preferences and fructose: Evidence that the liver detects the unconditioned stimulus for calorie-based learning. Appetite 14:29-44; 1990.
28. 28. Yox, D. P.; Brenner, L.; Ritter, R. C. CCK-receptor antagonists attenuate suppression of sham feeding by intestinal nutrients. Am. J. Physiol. 262:R554-R561; 1992.