Neuroscience: ATP signalling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves

Science

Volumn 310, Issue 5753, 2005, Pages 1495-1499

  Finger, Thomas E ^a   Danilova, Vicktoria ^b   Barrows, Jennell ^a   Bartel, Dianna L ^a   Vigers, Alison J ^a   Stone, Leslie ^a,c   Hellekant, Goran ^b,d   Kinnamon, Sue C ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINETRIPHOSPHATE; CELLS; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ENETIC ELIMINATION; NEUROTRANSMITTERS; PURINERGIC RECEPTORS; TASTE BUDS;

NEUROLOGY;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MENTHOL; PURINE P2X RECEPTOR; AGENTS INTERACTING WITH TRANSMITTER, HORMONE OR DRUG RECEPTORS; PURINE P2 RECEPTOR; PURINE P2X2 RECEPTOR; PURINE P2X3 RECEPTOR; SEROTONIN 3 RECEPTOR;

MEDICINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; GLOSSOPHARYNGEAL NERVE; GUSTATORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOUSE; NEUROTRANSMITTER RELEASE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASTE ACUITY; TASTE BUD; TEMPERATURE; TOUCH; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CHORDA TYMPANI; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; MOUSE MUTANT;

ANIMALIA;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ANIMALS; CHORDA TYMPANI NERVE; GLOSSOPHARYNGEAL NERVE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NEUROTRANSMITTER AGENTS; RECEPTORS, PURINERGIC P2; RECEPTORS, SEROTONIN, 5-HT3; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASTE BUDS;

EID: 28544448048     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1118435     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Y. J. Huang et al., J. Neurosci. 25, 843 (2005).
2. N. Kaya, T. Shen, S. G. Lu, F. L. Zhao, S. Herness, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 286, R649 (2004).
3. P. A. Davies et al., Nature 397, 359 (1999).
4. K. P. Zeitz et al., J. Neurosci. 22, 1010 (2002).
5. X. Bo et al., Neuroreport 10, 1107 (1999).
6. R. A. North, Physiol. Rev. 82, 1013 (2002).
7. W. Rouget et al., J. Neurosci. 23, 11315 (2003).
8. D. A. Cockayne et al. J. Physiol. 567 (Pt. 2), 621 (2005).
9. A. M. Peier et al., Cell 108, 705 (2002).
10. Materials and methods and supplementary figures are available as supporting material on Science Online.
11. J. D. Dickman, D. V. Smith, Brain Res. 450, 25 (1988).
12. D. V. Smith, T. Hanamori, J. Neurophysiol. 65, 1098 (1991).
13. T. E. Finger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8981 (2003).
14. A. Sbarbati et al., J. Comp. Neurol. 475, 188 (2004).
15. M. I. Harrer, S. P. Travers, Brain Res. 711, 125 (1996).
16. S. P. Travers, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 282, R1798 (2002).
17. M. A. Barry, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40, 1919 (1992).
18. T. Iwayama, O. Nada, Exp. Cell Res. 46, 607 (1967).
19. D. L. Bartel, S. Sullivan, E. Lavoie, J. Sévingy, T. E. Finger, Chem. Senses, in press.
20. M. S. Herness, Neuroscience 33, 411 (1989).
21. T. Shen et al., Neuroscience 130, 229 (2005).
22. 3A receptor knockout animals, R. Margolskee of Mt. Sinai School of Medicine for use of the gustducin-GFP mice, and E. Delay (University of Vermont) for help with statistical analysis. This work was supported by grants from NIH National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders R01 DC06070, R01 DC00766, and P30 DC04657.