Type of negative feedback controlling sucrose ingestion depends on sucrose concentration

American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Volumn 278, Issue 2 47-2, 2000, Pages

  Davis, John D ^a   Smith, Gerard P ^b   Singh, Bramdeo ^b  

^a NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Conditioned satiety; Food intake; Meal size; Postingestional feedback

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FOOD INTAKE; MALE; MEAL; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SATIETY; SHAM FEEDING; SUGAR INTAKE;

EID: 0034055949     PISSN: 03636119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.278.2.r383     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barker, G. R., G. M. Cochrane, G. A. Corbett, J. N. Hunt, and S. K. Roberts. Actions of glucose and potassium chloride on osmoreceptors slowing gastric emptying. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 237: 183-186, 1974.
2. Davis, J. D. Quick Lick Computer Software Program. Chicago, IL, 1992.
3. Davis, J. D., and C. S. Campbell. Peripheral control of meal size: effect of sham feeding on meal size and drinking rate. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83: 379-387, 1973.
4. Davis, J. D., and G. P. Smith. Learning to sham feed: behavioral adjustments to the absence of postingestional stimulation. Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 259: R1228-R1235, 1990.
5. Davis, J. D., and G. P. Smith. Microstructural analysis of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behav. Neurosci. 106: 217-228, 1992.
6. Davis, J. D., G. P. Smith, and J. Miesner. Postpyloric stimuli are necessary for the normal control of meal size in real feeding and sham feeding rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 265: R888-R895, 1993.
7. Davis, J. D., G. P. Smith, and B. Singh. Learning to sham feed sweetened condensed milk: the increase in intake with sham-feeding experience is concentration dependent. Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 277: R565-R571, 1999.
8. Emits, T., and J. D. Corbitt. Taste as a dipsogenic stimulus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 83: 27-31, 1973.
9. Jacobs, H. L. The osmotic postingestion factor in the regulation of glucose appetite. In: The Physiological and Behavioral Aspects of Taste, edited by M. R. Kare and B. P. Halpern. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.
10. McCleary, R. A. Taste and postingestive factors in specific hunger behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 46: 411-421, 1953.
11. Mook, D. G., R. Culberson, R. J. Gelbart, and K. McDonald. Oropharyngeal control of ingestion in rats: acquisition of sham-drinking patterns. Behav. Neurosci. 97: 574-584, 1983.
12. Nissenbaum, J. W., and A. Sclafani. Sham-feeding response of rats to polycose and sucrose. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11: 215-222, 1987.
13. Richter, C. P., and K. H. Campbell. Taste thresholds and taste preferences of rats for five common sugars. J. Nutr. 20: 32-46, 1940.
14. Schneider, L. H., J. Gibbs, and G. P. Smith. D-2 selective receptor antagonists suppress sucrose sham feeding in the rat. Brain Res. Bull. 17: 605-611, 1986.
15. Sclafani, A., and J. W. Nissenbaum. Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding? Am. J. Physiol. Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 248: R387-R390, 1985.
16. Stellar, E. Drive and motivation. In: Handbook of Physiology Neurophysiology. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1960, sec. 1, vol. III, chapt. 62, p. 1501-1528.
17. Weingarten, H. P., and O. T. Kulikovsky. Taste-to postingestive consequence conditioning: is the rise in sham feeding with repeated experience a learning phenomenon? Physiol. Behav. 45: 471-476, 1989.
18. Young, R. C., J. Gibbs, J. Antin, and G. P. Smith. Absence of satiety during sham feeding in the rat. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 87: 795-800, 1974.