Keyword: School effectiveness criteria in international empirical research;Stichwort: Schuleffektivitätskriterien in der internationalen empirischen forschung

Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 348-367

  Seidel, Tina ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Achievement; Education; Instruction; School; School effectiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249120650     PISSN: 1434663X     EISSN: 18625215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-008-0032-4     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Alexander et al. 2002 = Alexander, P.A./Fives, H./Buehl, M. M./Mulhern, J. (2002): Teaching as persuasion. In: Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), pp. 795-813.
2. Allsopp, D. H. (1997): Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. In: Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 18(6), pp. 367-379.
3. Anderman et al. 2001 = Anderman, E. M./Eccles, J. S./Yoon, K. S./Roeser, R./Wigfield, A./Blumenfeld, P. (2001): Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 26(1), pp.76-95.
4. Applebee et al. 2003 = Applebee, A. N./Langer, J. A./Nystrand, M./Gamoran, A. (2003): Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(3), pp. 685-730.
5. Arnold et al. 2002 = Arnold, D. H./Fisher, P. H./Doctoroff, G. L./Dobbs, J. (2002): Accelerating math development in head start classrooms. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(4), pp. 762-770.
6. Ashman, A. F./Gillies, R. M. (1997): Children's cooperative behavior and interactions in trained and untrained work groups in regular classrooms. In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 35(3), pp. 261-279.
7. Baumann et al. 2003 = Baumann, J. F./Edwards, E. C./Boland, E. M./Olejnik, S./Kame'enui, E. J. (2003): Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students' ability to derive and infer word meanings. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(2), pp. 447-494.
8. Behets, C. (2001): Comparison of more and less effective teaching behaviors in secondary physical education. In: Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 13(2), pp. 215-224.
9. Bennacer, H. (2000): How the socioecological characteristics of the classroom affect academic achievement. In: European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 15(2), pp. 173-189.
10. Berry, C. (2001): Achievement effects of multigrade and monograde primary schools in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In: International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 21(6), pp. 537-552.
11. Bianchini, J. A. (1997): Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: student learning of science in small groups. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 34(10), pp. 1039-1065.
12. Borsch, F./Jurgen-Lohmann, J./Giesen, H. (2002): Cooperative learning in elementary schools: Effects of the jigsaw method on student achievement in science. In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49(3), S. 172-183.
13. Brush, T. A. (1997): The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. In: ETR&D - Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 45(1), pp. 51-64.
14. Burns, R. B./Mason, D. A. (2002): Class composition and student achievement in elementary schools. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 39(1), pp. 207-233.
15. Byrne, B./Fieldingbarnsley, R. (1995): Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young-children - a 2-year and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 87(3), pp. 488-503.
16. Cantrell, S. C. (1999): The effects of literacy instruction on primary students' reading and writing achievement. In: Reading Research and Instruction, Vol. 39(1), pp. 3-26.
17. Caroll, J. (1963): A model for school learning. In: Teachers College Record, Vol. 64, pp. 723-733.
18. Chang, C. Y. (2002): The impact of different forms of multimedia CAI on students' science achievement. In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 39(4), pp. 280-288.
19. Chang, C. Y./Barufaldi, J. P. (1999): The use of a problem-solving-based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 21(4), pp. 373-388.
20. Chinn, C. A./Anderson, R. C./Waggoner, M. A. (2001): Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 36(4), pp. 378-411.
21. Chularut, P./DeBacker, T. K. (2004): The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 29(3), pp. 248-263.
22. Coe, R./Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1998): School effectiveness research: Criticisms and recommendations. In: Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 24(4), pp. 421-438.
23. Cooper et al. 1998 = Cooper, H./Lindsay, J. J./Nye, B./Greathouse, S. (1998): Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(1), pp. 70-83.
24. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994): The Effective Classroom. - London.
25. Creemers, B. P. M./Werf, G. v. d. (2000): Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(2), pp. 197-235.
26. Crinjen, A. A. M./Feehan, M. (1998): The course and malleability of a reading achievement in elementary school: The application of growth curve modeling in the evaluation of a mastery learning intervention. In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 10(2), pp. 137.
27. D'Agostino, J. V. (2000): Instructional and school effects on students' longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(2), pp. 197-235.
28. De Fraine et al. 2003 = De Fraine, B./Van Damme, J./Van Landeghem, G./Opdenakker, M. C./Onghena, P. (2003): The effect of schools and classes on language achievement. In: British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), S. 841-859.
29. De Jong, R/Westerhof, K. J./Kruiter, J. H. (2004): Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: A multilevel study in mathematics in the 1st year of junior general education in the Netherlands. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 15(1), pp. 3-31.
30. Ditton, H. (2000): Qualitätskontrolle und Qualitätssicherung in Schule und Unterricht. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41. Beiheft, S. 73-92.
31. Ditton, H. (2007): Schulqualität - Modelle zwischen Konstruktion, empirischen Befunden und Implementierung. In: Buer, J. van/Wagner, C. (Hrsg.): Qualität von Schule. - Frankfurt a. M., S. 83-92.
32. Driessen, G./Sleegers, P (2000): Consistency of teaching approach and student achievement: An empirical test. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(1), pp. 57-79.
33. Einsiedler, W./Treinies, G. (1997): Effects of teaching methods, class effects, and patterns of cognitive teacher-pupil interactions in an experimental study in primary school classes. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 8(3), pp. 327-353.
34. Fend, H. (1998): Qualität im Bildungswesen. Schulforschung zu Systembedingungen, Schulprofilen und Lehrerleistung. - Weinheim.
35. Foorman et al. 1998 = Foorman, B. R./Francis, D. J./Fletcher, J. M./Schatschneider, C./Mehta, P (1998): The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(1), pp. 37-55.
36. Freedman, M. P. (1997): Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 34(4), pp. 343-357.
37. Fuchs et al. 1997 = Fuchs, D./Fuchs, L. S./Mathes, P. G./Simmons, D. C. (1997): Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34(1), pp. 174-206.
38. George, R./Kaplan, D. (1998): A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. In: Science Education, Vol. 82(1), pp. 93-109.
39. Ginsburg-Block, M. D./Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998): An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(3), pp. 560-569.
40. Griffith, J. (2003): Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(1), pp. 29-47.
41. Grift, W. v. d./Houtveen, A. A. M. (1999): Educational leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(4), pp. 29-47.
42. Gruehn, S. (1995): Vereinbarkeit kognitiver und nichtkognitiver Ziele im Unterricht. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41. Jg., S. 531-553.
43. Guthrie et al. 1998 = Guthrie, J. T./Van Meter, P./Hancock, G. R./Alao, S./Anderson, E./McCann, A. (1998): Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(2), pp. 261-278.
44. Hallinger, P./Brickman, L./Davis, K. (1996): School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 96(5), pp. 527-549.
45. Hamilton et al. 1995 = Hamilton, L. S./Nussbaum, E. M./Kupermintz, H./Kerkhoven, J. I. M./Snow, R. E. (1995): Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32(3), pp. 555-581.
46. Hardre, P. L./Reeve, J. (2003): A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of high school. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95(2), pp. 347-356.
47. Heck, R. H./Marcoulides, G. A. (1996): School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 7(1), pp. 76-95.
48. Henderson, R. W./Landesman, E. M. (1995): Effects of thematically integrated mathematics instruction on students of Mexican descent. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 88(5), pp. 290-300.
49. Hill, P. W./Rowe, K. J. (1998): Modeling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(3), pp. 310-333.
50. Hogan, K. (1999): Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 36(10), pp. 1085-1109.
51. Hopkins, K. B./McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V./DeLisi, R. (1997): Student gender and teaching methods as sources of variability in children's computational arithmetic performance. In: Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 158(3), pp. 333-345.
52. Houghton, S./Litwin, M./Carroll, A. (1995): Peer mediated intervention in reading instruction using pause, prompt and praise. In: Educational Studies, Vol. 21(3), pp. 361-377.
53. Houtveen et al. 1999 = Houtveen, A. A. M./Booij, N./Jong, R. de/Grift, W. van de (1999): Adaptive instruction and pupil achievement. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(2), pp. 172-192.
54. Jacob, B. A./Lefgren, L. (2004): The impact of teacher training on student achievement - Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. In: Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 39(1), pp. 50-79.
55. Jacobson, C./Lehrer, R. (2000): Teacher appropriation and student learning of geometry through design. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31(1), pp. 71-88.
56. Jovanovic, J./King, S. S. (1998): Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who's doing the performing? In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 35(3), pp. 477-496.
57. Kramarski, B./Mevarech, Z. R. (1997): Cognitive-metacognitive training within a problem-solving based Logo environment. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 425-445.
58. Kroesbergen, E. H./Van Luit, J. E. H./Maas, C. J. M. (2004): Effectiveness of explicit and constructivist mathematics instruction for low-achieving students in the Netherlands. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(3), pp. 233-251.
59. Kuklinski, M. R./Weinstein, R. S. (2001): Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. In: Child Development, Vol. 72(5), pp. 1554-1578.
60. Kupermintz et al. 1995 = Kupermintz, H./Ennis, M. M./Hamilton, L. S./Talbert, J. E./Snow, R. E. (1995): Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32(3), pp. 525-554.
61. Kyriakides, L./Campbell, R. J./Gagatsis, A. (2000): The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(4), pp. 501-529.
62. Lazarowitz, R./Baird, J. H./Bowlden, V (1996): Teaching biology in a group mastery learning mode: high school students' academic achievement and affective outcomes. In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 18(4), pp. 447-462.
63. Lee, V E./Loeb, S. (2000): School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers' attitudes and students' achievement. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37(1), pp. 3-31.
64. Leithwood, K./Jantzi, D. (2000): Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. In: School Leadership and Management, Vol. 30(4), pp. 415-434.
65. Luyten, H./de Jong, R. (1998): Parallel classes: Differences and similarities. Teacher effects and school effects in secondary schools. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(4), pp. 437-473.
66. Marks, H. M. (2000): Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37(1), pp. 153-184.
67. Mathes et al. 1998 = Mathes, P. G./Howard, J. K./Allen, S. H./Fuchs, D. (1998): Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 33(1), pp. 62-94.
68. McGuinness, D./McGuinness, C./Donohue, J. (1995): Phonological training and the alphabet principle - Evidence for reciprocal causality. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30(4), pp. 830-852.
69. Mevarech, Z. R. (1999): Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 92(4), pp. 195-205.
70. Miller, S. D./Meece, J. L. (1997): Enhancing elementary students' motivation to read and write: A classroom intervention study. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 90(5), pp. 286-299.
71. Muijs, D./Reynolds, D. (2000): School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(3), pp. 273-303.
72. Muijs, D./Reynolds, D. (2003): The effectiveness of the use of learning support assistants in improving the mathematics achievement of low achieving pupils in primary school. In: Educational Research, Vol. 45(3), pp. 219-230.
73. Muthukrishna, N./Borkowski, J. G. (1995): How learning contexts facilitate strategy transfer. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 9(5), pp. 425-446.
74. Nolen, S. B. (2003): Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 40(4), pp. 347-368.
75. Okpala, C. O./Okpala, A. O./Smith, F. E. (2001): Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 95(2), pp. 110-115.
76. Olina, Z./Sullivan, H. J. (2002): Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. In: ETR&D - Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 50(3), pp. 61-75.
77. Opdenakker, M. C./Damme, J. v. (2001): Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27(4), pp. 407-432.
78. Perry, N. E. (1998): Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(4), pp. 715-729.
79. Phillips, M. (1997): What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34(4), pp. 633-662.
80. Ramsden, J. M. (1997): How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 19(6), pp. 697-710.
81. Robert Bosch Stiftung (2007): Der Deutsche Schulpreis. - URL: http://schulpreis.bosch-stiftung.de (Download: 21.1.2008).
82. Roby, D. E. (2004): Research on school attendance and student achievement: A study of Ohio schools. In: Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28(1), pp. 3-14.
83. Rowe, K. K. J./Hill, P. W. (1998): Modeling educational effectiveness in classrooms: The use of multi-level structural equations to model students' progress. In: Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 4(4), pp. 307-347.
84. Sammons, P. (1999): School effectiveness: coming of age in the 21st century. - Lisse.
85. Sammons, P./Hillman, J./Mortimore, P. (1995): Key characteristics of effective schools: a review of school effectiveness research. - London.
86. Scheerens, J. (2000): Improving school effectiveness. - Paris.
87. Scheerens, J./Bosker, R. J. (1997): The foundations of educational effectiveness. - Oxford.
88. Scheerens et al. 2005 = Scheerens, J./Seidel, T./Witziers, B./Hendriks, M./Doornekamp, G. (2005): Positioning the supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education of the Dutch Educational Inspectorate in current educational discourse and validating core indicators against the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research. - Enschede/Kiel: University of Twente/Institute for Science Education (IPN).
89. Seidel, T./Rimmele, R./Prenzel, M. (2005): Clarity and Coherence of Lesson Goals as a Scaffold for Student Learning. In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 15(6), pp. 539-556.
90. Seidel, T./Shavelson, R. J. (2007): Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: Role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, pp. 454-499.
91. Self-Brown, S. R./Mathews, S. (2003): Effects of classroom structure on student achievement goal orientation. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 97(2), pp. 106-111.
92. She, H. C./Fisher, D. (2002): Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 39(1), pp. 63-78.
93. Silins, H./Mulford, B. (2002): Schools as learning organisations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. In: Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 40(5), pp. 425-446.
94. Smyth, E. (1999): Pupil performance, absenteeism and school drop-out: A multi-dimensional analysis. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(4), pp. 480-502.
95. Snow, R. E./Frederico, P.-A./Montague, W. E. (Eds.) (1980): Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction. - Hillsdale.
96. Stanat, P./Watermann, R./Baumert, J. (Hrsg.). (2006). Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen. Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. - Wiesbaden.
97. Staub, F. C./Stern, E. (2002): The nature of teachers' pedagogical content beliefs matters for students' achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(2), pp. 344-355.
98. Stevens, R. J./Slavin, R. E. (1995): Effects of a cooperative learning approach in reading and writing on academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 95(3), pp. 241-262.
99. Stipek et al. 1998 = Stipek, D./Salmon, J. M./Givvin, K. B./Kazemi, E./Saxe, G./MacGyvers, V L. (1998): The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 29(4), pp. 465-488.
100. Sweetland, S. R./Hoy, W. K. (2000): School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward and organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36(5), pp. 703-729.
101. Taylor et al. 2003 = Taylor, B. M./Pearson, P. D./Peterson, D. S./Rodriguez, M. C. (2003): Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(1), pp. 3-28.
102. Tiedemann, J./Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2004): Kontextfaktoren der Schulleistung im Grundschulalter. Ergebnisse aus der Hannoverschen Grundschulstudie. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, Bd. 18(2), S. 113-124.
103. Townsend, M. A. R./Hicks, L. (1997): Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 1-12.
104. Trautwein et al. 2002 = Trautwein, U./Köller, O./Schmitz, B./Baumert, J. (2002): Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary. In: Educational Psychology, Vol. 27(1), pp. 26-50.
105. Turner, J. C. (1995): The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30(3), pp. 410-441.
106. Turner et al. 2002 = Turner, J. C./Midgley, C./Meyer, D. K./Gheen, M./Anderman, E. M./Kang, Y./Patrick, H. (2002): The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(1), pp. 88-106.
107. Uline, C. L./Miller, D. M./Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998): School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 34(4), pp. 462-483.
108. Van de Gaer et al. 2004 = Van de Gaer, E./Pustjens, H./Damme, J. v./Munter, A. d. (2004): Effects of single-sex versus co-educational classes and schools on gender differences in progress in language and mathematics achievement. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 25(3), pp. 307-322.
109. Van Horn, M. L./Ramey, S. L. (2003): The effects of Developmentally Appropriate Practices on academic outcomes among former head start students and classmates, Grades 1-3. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(4), pp. 961-990.
110. Wenglinsky, H. (2002): The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. In: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 10(12). - URL: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/ (Download: 22.07.2008).
111. Werf, G. v. d. (1997): Differences in school and instruction characteristics between high-, average-, and low-effective schools. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 8(4), pp. 430-448.
112. Werf et al. 2000 = Werf, G. v. d./Creemers, B. P. M./Jong, R./Klaver, E. (2000): Evaluation of school improvement through an educational effectiveness model: The case of Indonesia's PEQIP project. In: Comparative Education Review, Vol. 44(3), pp. 329-355.
113. White, B. Y./Frederiksen, J. R. (1998): Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. In: Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 16(1), pp. 3-118.
114. Wigfield et al. 2004 = Wigfield, A./Guthrie, J. T./Tonks, S./Perencevich, K. C. (2004): Children's motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 97(6), pp. 299-309.
115. Willms, J. D./Somers, M. A. (2001): Family, classroom, and school effects on children's educational outcomes in Latin America. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 12(4), pp. 409-445.
116. Wong, K. C./Lam, Y R./Ho, L. M. (2002): The effects of schooling on gender differences. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28(6), pp. 827-843.
117. Yair, G. (2000): Reforming motivation: how the structure of instruction affects students' learning experiences. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 26(2), pp. 191-210.
118. Young, D. Y (1998): Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(4), pp. 386-418.