Differences in School and Instruction Characteristics between High-, Average-, and Low-Effective Schools

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 430-448

  Van Der Werf, Greetje ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010724576     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0924345970080403     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Asher, C., & Flaxman, E. (1987). Parent participation and the achievement of disadvantaged students. In D.S. Stickland & E.J. Cooper (Eds.), Educating black children: America's challenge (pp. 70-76). Washington DC: Howard University.
2. Batenburg, Th.A. van (1990). Variatie in schoolgemiddelden op de CITO eindtoets basisonderwijs [Variance in school means on the Elementary School-Leaving Test]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs Research, 15, 362-369.
3. Bergen, J.B.A.M. van (1989). Verantwoording constructie toetsen voor de evaluatie van het onderwijsvoorrangsbeleid [Account of the construction of tests for the evaluation of the EPP]. Arnhem: CITO.
4. Bloom, B.S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 41, 4-16.
6. Bosker, R.J. (1990). Extra kansen dankzij de school? [Extra opportunities because of the school?]. Nijmegen: ITS, OOMO reeks.
7. Bosker, R.J. (1991). De consistentie van schooleffecten in het basisonderwijs [The consistency of school effects in primary education]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs Research, 16, 206-218.
8. Brandsma, H.P. (1993). Basisschoolkenmerken en de kwaliteit van het onderwijs [Primary school features and the quality of education]. Groningen: RION.
9. Brandsma, H.P., & Knuver, J.W.M. (1989). Basisschoolkenmerken als determinanten van het functioneren van leerlingen. Deelrapport II. Resultaten. [Primary school features as decisive factors of pupil functioning. Report II. Results]. Groningen: RION.
10. Brophy, J., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
11. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
12. Carroll, J.B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Eucational Researcher, 18, 26-31.
13. Creemers, B.P.M. (1991). Effectieve instructie. Een empirische bijdrage aan de verbetering van het onderwijs in de klas. [Effective instruction. An empirical contribution to i the improvement of classroom education]. The Hague: SVO Balansreeks.
14. Denham, C., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (1980). Time to learn: A review of the beginning teacher evaluation study. Washington: National Institute of Education.
15. Doddema-Winsemius, H., & Werf, M.P.C. van der (1989). Selectie/constructie van toetsen voor het meten van sociale redzaamheid en intelligentie ten behoeve van de evaluatie OVB [Selection/construction of tests for measuring social cognition and intelligence to be used in the EPP evaluation]. Groningen: RION.
16. Edmonds, R. (1979). A discussion of the literature and issues related to effective schooling. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
17. Fraser, B.J., Walberg, H.J., Welch, W.W., & Hattie, J.A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145-252.
18. Good, Th.L., & Brophy, J. (1986). School effects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570-605). New York: Macmillan.
19. Levin, H.M. (1990). Accelerating the progress of at risk students. Paper presented at the 8th Rockefeller Institute Policy Seminar, New York.
20. Longford, N. (1988). VARCL-manual. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
21. Meester, A., & Leeuw, J. de (1983). Intelligentie, sociaal milieu en de schoolloopbaari. [Intelligence, SES and the educational career]. Leiden: Faculty of Social Sciences.
22. Meijnen, G.W. (1977). Maatschappelijke achtergronden van intellectuele ontwikkeling [Social background and intellectual development]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
23. Meijnen, G.W. (1984). Vanzes tot twaalf. Een longitudinaal onderzoek naar de milieu-en schooleffecten van loopbanen in het lager onderwijs [From six to twelve. A longitudinal research into the SES-en school effects of educational careers in elementary education]. Harlingen: SVO reeks no. 79.
24. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P, Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books.
25. Pelgrum, W.J. (1989). Educational assessment: Monitoring, evaluation and the curriculum. Enschede: Febo.
26. Peschar, J.L. (1975). Milieu, school en beroep [SES, school and occupation]. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink.
27. Purkey, S.C., & Smith, M.S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-252.
28. Reezigt, G.J. (1993). Effecten van differentiate op de basis school [Effects of differentiation in primary school]. Groningen: RION.
29. Rosenshine, B.V., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-392). New York: Macmillan.
30. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development, 54, 1-29.
31. Scheerens, J. (1989). Wat maakt schalen effectief? Samenvatting en analyse van onderzoeksresultaten [What makes schools effective? Summary and analysis of research results]. The Hague: SVO Balansreeks.
32. Slavin, R. (1986). Quality, appropriateness, incentive and time: elements of effective instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA.
33. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9, 11-16.
34. Tesser, P.Th.M. (1986). Sociale herkamst en schoolloopbanen in het voortgezet onderwijs. [Social background and school careers in secondary education]. Nijmegen ITS.
35. Tesser, P., Mulder, L., & Werf, G. van der (1991). De eerste fase van de longitudinale OVB cohortonderzoeken [The first stage of the longitudinal EPP cohort studies]. Nijmegen/Groningen: ITS/RION.
36. Veenman, S. Lern, P., Voeten, M., Winkelmolen, M., & Lassche, H. (1986). Onderwijs in combinatieklassen [Education in combination groups]. The Hague: SVO.
37. Walberg, H.J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 214-230). New York: Macmillan.
38. Werf, G. van der (1994). School and instruction characteristics and pupils arithmetic achievements at the end of primary education. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs Research, 19, 39-50.
39. Werf, M.P.C. van der, & Guldemond, H. (1994). De tweede meting van de OVB-evaluatie in het basisonderwijs. School-en klaskenmerken in schooljaar 1990/1991. [The second measurement of the EPP evaluation in primary education. School and class characteristics in schoolyear 1990/1991]. Groningen/Nijmegen: RION/ITS.
40. Werf, M.P.C. van der, Weide, M.G., & Tesser, P. (1991). Het onderwijsvoorrangsbeleid in de school en in de klas. De eerste meting in het basisonderwijs. [The EPP in the school and in the classroom. The first measurement in primary education.] Groningen/Nijmegen: RION/ITS.