Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 185, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 423-437

  Enserink, Jorrit M ^a,b,c   Hombauer, Hans ^a,b,c   Huang, Meng Er ^d   Kolodner, Richard D ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 1; MRE11 PROTEIN; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITOR; PHLEOMYCIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL VIABILITY; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; TELOMERE; CELL SURVIVAL; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CDC28 PROTEIN KINASE, S CEREVISIAE; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MITOSIS; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; PHLEOMYCINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 65649090278     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 00219525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200811083     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Amon, A., U. Surana, I. Muroff, and K. Nasmyth. 1992. Regulation of p34CDC28 tyrosine phosphorylation is not required for entry into mitosis in S. cerevi- siae. Nature. 355:368-371.
2. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, and M. Kupiec. 2004. The CDK regulates repair of double- strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23:4868-4875.
3. Barberis, M., L. De Gioia, M. Ruzzene, S. Sarno, P. Coccetti, P. Fantucci, M. Vanoni, and L. Alberghina. 2005. The yeast cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Sicl and mammalian p27Kip1 are functional homologues with a structurally conserved inhibitory domain. Biochem. J. 387:639-647.
4. Barlow, J.H., M. Lisby, and R. Rothstein. 2008. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol. Cell. 30:73-85.
5. Bartkova, J., Z. Horejsi, K. Koed, A. Kramer, F. Tort, K. Zieger, P. Guldberg, M. Sehested, J.M. Nesland, C. Lukas, et al. 2005. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 434:864-870.
6. Bishop, A.C., J.A. Ubersax, D.T. Petsch, D.P. Matheos, N.S. Gray, J. Blethrow, E. Shimizu, J.Z. Tsien, P.G. Schultz, M.D. Rose, et al. 2000. A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature. 407:395-401.
7. Bloom, J., and F.R. Cross. 2007. Multiple levels of cyclin specificity in cell-cycle control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:149-160.
8. Bonilla, C.Y., J.A. Melo, and D.P. Toczyski. 2008. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell. 30:267-276.
9. Chen, C., and R.D. Kolodner. 1999. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat. Genet. 23:81-85.
10. Cohen-Fix, O., and D. Koshland. 1997. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:14361-14366.
11. Cohen-Fix, O., and D. Koshland. 1999. Pds1p of budding yeast has dual roles: inhibition of anaphase initiation and regulation of mitotic exit. Genes Dev. 13:1950-1959.
12. Diffley, J.F. 2004. Regulation of early events in chromosome replication. Curr. Biol. 14:R778-R786.
13. Dotiwala, F., J. Haase, A. Arbel-Eden, K. Bloom, and J.E. Haber. 2007. The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:11358-11363.
14. Enders, G.H., and S.L. Maude. 2006. Traffic safety for the cell: influence of cyclin- dependent kinase activity on genomic stability. Gene. 371:1-6.
15. Enserink, J.M., M.B. Smolka, H. Zhou, and R.D. Kolodner. 2006. Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 175:729-741.
16. Frank, C.J., M. Hyde, and C.W. Greider. 2006. Regulation of telomere elongation by the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1. Mol. Cell. 24:423-432.
17. Gibson, D.G., J.G. Aparicio, F. Hu, and O.M. Aparicio. 2004. Diminished S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase function elicits vital Rad53-dependent checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10208-10222.
18. Grandin, N., and M. Charbonneau. 2003. Mitotic cyclins regulate telomeric recombination in telomerase-deficient yeast cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:9162-9177.
19. Gravel, S., J.R. Chapman, C. Magill, and S.P. Jackson. 2008. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 22:2767-2772.
20. Greene, C.N., and S. Jinks-Robertson. 1997. Frameshift intermediates in homo- polymer runs are removed efficiently by yeast mismatch repair proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2844-2850.
21. Hanahan, D., and R.A. Weinberg. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 100:57-70.
22. Hartwell, L.H., and T.A. Weinert. 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 246:629-634.
23. Hasty, P., J. Campisi, J. Hoeijmakers, H. van Steeg, and J. Vijg. 2003. Aging and genome maintenance: lessons from the mouse? Science. 299:1355-1359.
24. Henderson, K.A., K. Kee, S. Maleki, P.A. Santini, and S. Keeney. 2006. Cyclin- dependent kinase directly regulates initiation of meiotic recombination. Cell. 125:1321-1332.
25. Huang, M.E., and R.D. Kolodner. 2005. A biological network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prevents the deleterious effects of endogenous oxidative DNA damage. Mol. Cell. 17:709-720.
26. Huertas, P., F. Cortes-Ledesma, A.A. Sartori, A. Aguilera, and S.P. Jackson. 2008. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature. 455:689-692.
27. Hwang, W.W., S. Venkatasubrahmanyam, A.G. Ianculescu, A. Tong, C. Boone, and H.D. Madhani. 2003. A conserved RING finger protein required for histone H2B monoubiquitination and cell size control. Mol. Cell. 11:261-266.
28. Ira, G., A. Pellicioli, A. Balijja, X. Wang, S. Fiorani, W. Carotenuto, G. Liberi, D. Bressan, L. Wan, N.M. Hollingsworth, et al. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature. 431:1011-1017.
29. Kellogg, D.R. 2003. Wee1-dependent mechanisms required for coordination of cell growth and cell division. J. Cell Sci. 116:4883-4890.
30. Kitazono, A.A., and S.J. Kron. 2002. An essential function of yeast cyclin- dependent kinase Cdc28 maintains chromosome stability. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48627-48634.
31. Kitazono, A.A., D.A. Garza, and S.J. Kron. 2003. Mutations in the yeast cyclin- dependent kinase Cdc28 reveal a role in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 269:672-684.
32. Kolodner, R.D., C.D. Putnam, and K. Myung. 2002. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 297:552-557.
33. Krishnan, V., S. Nirantar, K. Crasta, A.Y. Cheng, and U. Surana. 2004. DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior. Mol. Cell. 16:687-700.
34. Lengronne, A., and E. Schwob. 2002. The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1). Mol. Cell. 9:1067-1078.
35. Leroy, C., S.E. Lee, M.B. Vaze, F. Ochsenbien, R. Guerois, J.E. Haber, and M.C. Marsolier-Kergoat. 2003. PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol. Cell. 11:827-835.
36. Lew, D.J. 2003. The morphogenesis checkpoint: how yeast cells watch their figures. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15:648-653.
37. Li, S., S. Makovets, T. Matsuguchi, J.D. Blethrow, K.M. Shokat, and E.H. Blackburn. 2009. Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation of Cdc13 coordinates telomere elongation during cell-cycle progression. Cell. 136:50-61.
38. Li, X., and M. Cai. 1997. Inactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28 abrogates cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage and disassembly of mitotic spindles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2723-2734.
39. Liberi, G., I. Chiolo, A. Pellicioli, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and M. Foiani. 2000. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19:5027-5038.
40. Lisby, M., J.H. Barlow, R.C. Burgess, and R. Rothstein. 2004. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell. 118:699-713.
41. Lopes, M., C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, P. Plevani, M. Muzi- Falconi, C.S. Newlon, and M. Foiani. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature. 412:557-561.
42. Majka, J., A. Niedziela-Majka, and P.M. Burgers. 2006. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. 24:891-901.
43. Malumbres, M. 2005. Revisiting the "Cdk-centric" view of the mammalian cell cycle. Cell Cycle. 4:206-210.
44. Malumbres, M., and M. Barbacid. 2005. Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:630-641.
45. Malumbres, M., and M. Barbacid. 2009. Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 9:153-166.
46. Marsischky, G.T., N. Filosi, M.F. Kane, and R. Kolodner. 1996. Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 10:407-420.
47. Mimitou, E.P., and L.S. Symington. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature. 455:770-774.
48. Myung, K., and R.D. Kolodner. 2002. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:4500-4507.
49. Myung, K., C. Chen, and R.D. Kolodner. 2001a. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 411:1073-1076.
50. Myung, K., A. Datta, C. Chen, and R.D. Kolodner. 2001b. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27:113-116.
51. Myung, K., A. Datta, and R.D. Kolodner. 2001c. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 104:397-408.
52. Myung, K., V. Pennaneach, E.S. Kats, and R.D. Kolodner. 2003. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:6640-6645.
53. Myung, K., S. Smith, and R.D. Kolodner. 2004. Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:15980-15985.
54. O'Neill, B.M., S.J. Szyjka, E.T. Lis, A.O. Bailey, J.R. Yates III, O.M. Aparicio, and F.E. Romesberg. 2007. Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:9290-9295
55. Pan, X., P. Ye, D.S. Yuan, X. Wang, J.S. Bader, and J.D. Boeke. 2006. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 124:1069-1081.
56. Paulovich, A.G., R.U. Margulies, B.M. Garvik, and L.H. Hartwell. 1997. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics. 145:45-62.
57. Pearson, C.E., K.N. Edamura, and J.D. Cleary. 2005. Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:729-742.
58. Pennaneach, V., and R.D. Kolodner. 2004. Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast. Nat. Genet. 36:612-617.
59. Pennaneach, V., C.D. Putnam, and R.D. Kolodner. 2006. Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1357-1368.
60. Peter, M., and I. Herskowitz. 1994. Direct inhibition of the yeast cyclin- dependent kinase Cdc28-Cln by Far1. Science. 265:1228-1231.
61. Putnam, C.D., V. Pennaneach, and R.D. Kolodner. 2005. Saccharomyces cerevi- siae as a model system to define the chromosomal instability phenotype. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:7226-7238.
62. Robzyk, K., J. Recht, and M.A. Osley. 2000. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science. 287:501-504.
63. Sanchez, Y., J. Bachant, H. Wang, F. Hu, D. Liu, M. Tetzlaff, and S.J. Elledge. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science. 286:1166-1171.
64. Santocanale, C., and J.F. Diffley. 1998. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature. 395:615-618.
65. Schwob, E., T. Bohm, M.D. Mendenhall, and K. Nasmyth. 1994. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cere- visiae. Cell. 79:233-244.
66. Shapiro, G.I. 2006. Cyclin-dependent kinase pathways as targets for cancer treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 24:1770-1783.
67. Sleigh, M.J. 1976. The mechanism of DNA breakage by phleomycin in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 3:891-901.
68. Smolka, M.B., S.H. Chen, P.S. Maddox, J.M. Enserink, C.P. Albuquerque, X.X. Wei, A. Desai, R.D. Kolodner, and H. Zhou. 2006. An FHA domain- mediated protein interaction network of Rad53 reveals its role in polarized cell growth. J. Cell Biol. 175:743-753.
69. Sorger, P.K., and A.W. Murray. 1992. S-phase feedback control in budding yeast independent of tyrosine phosphorylation of p34cdc28. Nature. 355:365-368.
70. Spruck, C.H., K.A. Won, and S.I. Reed. 1999. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature. 401:297-300.
71. Sung, P., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1988. The RAD6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae polyubiquitinates histones, and its acidic domain mediates this activity. Genes Dev. 2:1476-1485.
72. Symington, L.S. 2002. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:630-670.
73. Tanaka, S., and J.F. Diffley. 2002. Deregulated G1-cyclin expression induces genomic instability by preventing efficient pre-RC formation. Genes Dev. 16:2639-2649.
74. Tishkoff, D.X., N. Filosi, G.M. Gaida, and R.D. Kolodner. 1997. A novel mutation avoidance mechanism dependent on S. cerevisiae RAD27 is distinct from DNA mismatch repair. Cell. 88:253-263.
75. Tran, H.T., J.D. Keen, M. Kricker, M.A. Resnick, and D.A. Gordenin. 1997. Hypermutability of homonucleotide runs in mismatch repair and DNA polymerase proofreading yeast mutants. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2859-2865.
76. Umezu, K., N. Sugawara, C. Chen, J.E. Haber, and R.D. Kolodner. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics. 148:989-1005.
77. Vodenicharov, M.D., and R.J. Wellinger. 2006. DNA degradation at unprotected telomeres in yeast is regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) cell-cycle ki- nase. Mol. Cell. 24:127-137.
78. Wood, A., N.J. Krogan, J. Dover, J. Schneider, J. Heidt, M.A. Boateng, K. Dean, A. Golshani, Y. Zhang, J.F. Greenblatt, et al. 2003. Bre1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase required for recruitment and substrate selection of Rad6 at a promoter. Mol. Cell. 11:267-274.
79. Yamamoto, A., V. Guacci, and D. Koshland. 1996a. Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 133:85-97.
80. Yamamoto, A., V. Guacci, and D. Koshland. 1996b. Pds1p, an inhibitor of ana- phase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J. Cell Biol. 133:99-110.
81. Zhu, Z., W.H. Chung, E.Y. Shim, S.E. Lee, and G. Ira. 2008. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell. 134:981-994.
82. Zierhut, C., and J.F. Diffley. 2008. Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J. 27:1875-1885.