Role of delta-like-3 in mammalian somitogenesis and vertebral column formation

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 638, Issue , 2008, Pages 95-112

  Dunwoodie, Sally L ^a   Chapman, Gavin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DELTA LIKE 1 PROTEIN; DELTA LIKE 3 PROTEIN; DELTA LIKE 4 PROTEIN; JAGGED1; JAGGED2 PROTEIN; LAG2 PROTEIN; MESP2 PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; NOTCH1 RECEPTOR; NOTCH2 RECEPTOR; NOTCH3 RECEPTOR; NOTCH4 RECEPTOR; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BINDING AFFINITY; CELL SURFACE; COCULTURE; DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GLYCOSYLATION; HUMAN; JARCHO LEVIN SYNDROME; LIGAND BINDING; MAMMAL; MESODERM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; MYOTOME; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; PHYLOGENY; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; SCLEROTOME; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITE; SOMITOGENESIS; SPINE; UBIQUITINATION;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GLYCOSYLATION; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HERNIA, DIAPHRAGMATIC; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMITES; SPINE;

MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 64749097068     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09606-3_5     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Kaufman MH, Bard JBL. Somites and their derivatives (muscles, dermis and vertebrae). In: Kaufman MH, Bard, J B L, ed. The Anatomical Basis of Mouse Development. Edinburgh: Academic Press; 1999:51-59.
2. Tam PP. The control of somitogenesis in mouse embryos.J Embryol Exp Morphol 1981; 65 Suppl: 103-128.
3. Brent AE, Tabin CJ. Developmental regulation of somite derivatives: muscle,cartilage and tendon. Cure Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12(5):548-557.
4. Brent AE, Schweitzer R, Tabin CJ. A somiric compartment of tendon progenitors. Cell 2003; 113(2):235-248.
5. Kieny M, Mauger A, Sengel P. Early regionalization of somitic mesoderm as studied by the development of axial skeleton of the chick embryo. Dev Biol 1972; 28(1):142-161.
6. Cauwenbergs P, Butler J, Cosmos E. Intraspecific chick/chick chimaeras: dystrophic somitic mesoderm transplanted to a normal host forms muscles with a dystrophic phenotype. Neurosci Lett 1986; 68(2):149-154.
7. Butler J, Cauwenbergs P, Cosmos E. Fate of brachial muscles of the chick embryo innervated by inappropriate nerves: structural, functional and histochemical analyses. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986; 95:147-168.
8. Stern CD, Keynes RJ. Interactions between somite cells: the formation and maintenance of segment boundaries in the chick embryo. Development 1987; 99(2):261-272.
9. Keynes RJ, Stern CD. Segmentation in the vertebrate nervous system. Nature 1984; 310(5980):786-789.
10. Rickmann M, Fawcett JW, Keynes RJ. The migration of neural crest cells and the growth of motor axons through the rostral half of the chick somite.J Embryol Exp Morphol1985; 90:437-455.
11. Maroto M, Pourquie O. A molecular clock involved in somite segmentation. Curr Top Dev Biol 2001; 51:221-248.
12. Cooke J, Zeeman EC. A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis.J Theor Biol 1976; 58(2):455-476.
13. Yamaguchi TP, Harpal K, Henkemeyer M et al. fgfr-l is required for embryonic growth and mesodermal patterning during mouse gastrulation. Genes Dev 1994; 8(24):3032-3044.
14. Takada S, Stark KL, Shea MJ er al. Wnt-3a regulates somite and railbud formation in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev 1994; 8(2):174-189.
15. Greco TL, Takada S, Newhouse MM et al, Analysis of the vestigial tail mutation demonstrates that Wnt-3a gene dosage regulates mouse axial development. Genes Dev 1996; 10(3):313-324.
16. Conlon RA, Reaume AG, Rossant J. Notch I is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development 1995; 121(5):1533-1545.
17. Dubrulle J, McGrew MJ, Pourquie O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spariotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 2001; 106(2):219-232.
18. Aulehla A, Wehrle C, Brand-Saberi B er al, Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis. Dev Cell 2003; 4(3):395-406.
19. Dubrulle J, Pourquie O. From head to tail: links between the segmentation clock and antero-posterior patterning of the embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002; 12(5):519-523.
20. Blaumueller CM, Qi H, Zagouras P er al. Intracellular cleavage of Notch leads to a hererodlmeric receptor on the plasma membrane. Cell 1997; 90(2):281-291.
21. Logeat F, BessiaC, Brou C et al. The Notch l receptor is cleavedconstitutively by a furin-like convertase, Proc Narl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95(14):8108-8112.
22. Rebay I, Fleming RJ, Fehon RG et al. Specific EGF repeats of Notch mediate interactions with Delta and Serrate: implications for Notch as a multifunctional receptor. Cell 1991; 67(4):687-699.
23. Fleming RJ. Structural conservation of Notch receptors and ligands. Semin Cell Dev Biol 1998; 9(6):599-607.
24. Hu QD, Ang BT, Karsak M er al. F3/contactin acts as a functional ligand for Notch during oligodendrocyte maturation. Cell 2003; 115(2):163-175.
25. Cui XY,Hu QD, TekayaM et al. NB-3/Notchl Pathway via Deltexl Promotes Neural Progenitor Cell Differentiation into Oligcdendrocytes. J Biol Chern 2004; 279(24):25858-25865.
26. Miyamoto A. Lau R. Hein PW er al. Microfibrillar proteins MAGP-l and MAGP-2 induce Notch l extracellular domain dissociation and receptot activation.J Biol Chern 2006; 281(15):10089-10097.
27. Brou C. Logear F. Gupta N et al. A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: the role of the disintegrin-metalloprotease TACE. Mol Cell 2000; 5(2 ):207-216.
28. Mumm JS. Schroeter EH. Saxena MT et al. A ligand-induced extracellular cleavage regulates gamma-cretase-like proteolytic act ivation of Notch1. Mol Cell 2000; 5(2 ):197-206 .
29. Schroeter EH. Kisslinger JA . Kopan R. Notch-I signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intr acellular domain. Nature 1998; 393 (6683 ):382-386.
30. Okochi M. Steiner H. Fukumori A er al. Presenilins mediate a dual int ramembranous gamma-secretase cleavage of Notch-I. EMBO J 2002; 21 (20 ):5408-5416.
31. De Strooper B. Saftig P; Craessarerts K er aI. Deficiency of presenilin-I inhibits the normal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein. Nature 1998; 391 :387-390.
32. Struhl G. Greenwald I. Presenilin-rnediared transmembrane cleavage is required for Notch signal transduction in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 ; 98(1):229-234.
33. Edbauer D. Winkler E. RegulaJT et al. Reconstitution ofgamma-secretase activity. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5(5):486-488.
34. Li Y-M, Xu M. Lai M-T et al. Photoactivared y-secretase inhibitors directed to the active site covalently label presenilin 1. Nature 2000; 405:689-694.
35. Esler WP. Kimberly WT. Ostaszewski BL et al. Transition-state analogue inhibitors of gamma-secretase bind directly to presenilin-L Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2(7):428-434.
36. Shah S. Lee SF. Tabuchi K et al. Nicastrin functions as a gamma-secrerase-subsrrare receptor. Cell 2005; 122(3):435-447.
37. Jarriault S. Brou C. Logear F et al, Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature 1995; 377 (6547):355-358.
38. Hsieh D. Henkel 1; Salmon P er al.Truncated mammalian Norch l activates CBF l/RBPJk-repressed genes by a mechanism resembling that of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2. Mol Cd! Biol 1996; 16(3):952-959.
39. Kao HY, Ordentlich P. Koyano-Nakagawa N et al. A histone deacerylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev 1998 ; 12( 15):2269-2277.
40. Oswald F. Tauber B. Dobner T et al. p300 acts as a transcriptional coacrivaror for mammalian Nocch-I . Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21(22):7761 -7774.
41. Wallberg AE. Pedersen K. Lcndahl U et al. p300 and PCAF act cooperatively to mediate transcriptional activation from chromatin templates by notch intracellular domains in vitro . Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22(22):7812-7819.
42. Cole SE. Levorse JM . Tilghman SM et aI. Clock regulatory elements control cyclic expression of Lunatic fringe during somirogenesis. Dev Cell 2002; 3(1 ):75-84.
43. Morales AY,Yasuda Y.Ish-Horowicz D. Periodic Lunatic fringe expression is controlled during segmentation by a cyclic transcriptional enhancer responsive to notch signaling. Dev Cell 2002; 3(1 ):63-74.
44. Iso T. Kedes L. Hamamori Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway.J Cell Physiol 2003; 194(3):237-255.
45. Ronchini C. Capobianco AJ. Induction of cyclin Dl transcription and CDK2 activity by Notch(ic): implication for cell cycle disruption in transformation by Notch(ic). Mol Cell Biol 2001 ; 21 (17 ):5925-5934.
46. Rangarajan A. Talora C. Okuyama R et al. Notch signaling is a direct determinant of keratinocyte growth arrest and entry into differ entiation. EMBO J 2001; 20 (13 ):3427-3436.
47. Krebs LT. Xue Y, Norton CR et al. Characterization of Norchj-deficienr mice: normal embryonic development and absence of genetic interactions with a Norchl mutation. Genesis 2003; 37(3):139-143.
48. Ge W; Martlnowich K. Wu X ct aI. Notch signaling promotes astrogliogenesis via direct CSL-mediated glial gene activation. J Neurosci Res 2002; 69(6):848-860.
49. Paroush Z. Finley RL. Jr. Kidd T ct al. Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesls, segmentation and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins. Cell 1994; 79(5):805-815.
50. Fisher A. Caudy M. The function of hairy-related bHLH repressor proteins in cell fate decisions. Bioessays 1998; 20(4):298-306.
51. Grbavec D. Stifani S. Molecular interaction between TLEI and the carboxyl-terminal domain of HES-l containing the WRPW moti Biochern Biophys Res Commun 1996 ; 223(3):701 -705.
52. Sasai Y. Kageyama R. Tagawa Y et al. Two mammalian helix-loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and Enhancer of split. Genes Dev 1992; 6(12B):2620-263 4.
53. Hirata H. Ohtsuka T. Bessho Y ct al. Generation of structurally and functionally distinct factors from the basic helix-loop -helix gene Hes3 by alternative first exons. J Biol Chern 2000; 275(25):19083-19089.
54. Shawber C. Nofziger D. Hsieh JJ-D et al. Notch signaling inhibits muscle cd! differentiation through a CBF-independent pathway. Development 1996; 122:3765 -3773.
55. Bush G. diSibio G. Miyamoto A et al. Ligand-induced signaling in the absence of furin processing of Notch l. Dev Biol 2001; 229(2):494-502.
56. Nye JS. Kopan R. Vertebrate ligands for Notch. Curr Biol 1995; 5:966-969.
57. Shimizu K. Chiba S. Kumano K et al. Mouse jagged1 physically interacts with nocch2 and other notch receptors. Assessment by quantitative methods. J Biol Chern 1999; 274(46):32961-32969.
58. Shimizu K, Chiba S. Saito T er al. Physical interaction of Delral, Jaggedl and Jagged2 with Norch l and Notch3 receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 276(1):385-389.
59. Shimizu K, Chiba S, Hosoya N ec al. Binding of Delta l, Jaggedl and Jagged2 co Notch2 rapidly induces cleavage. nuclear translocation and hyperphosphorylation of Notch2. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20(18):6913-6922.
60. Shimizu K, Chiba S. Saito T er al. Integriry of intracellular domain of Notch ligand is indispensable for cleavage required for release of the Nocch2 intracellular domain. EMBO J 2002; 21(3):294-302.
61. Varnum-FinneyB.Wu L. YuM et al. Immobilization of Notch ligand, Delra-I, is required for induction of notch signaling. J Cell Sci 2000; 113 Pc 23:4313-4318.
62. Sun X, Arcavanis-Tsakonas S. Secreted forms of DELTA and SERRATE define antagonists of Notch signaling in Drosophila. Development 1997; 124(17):3439-3448.
63. Hicks C, Ladi E. Lindsell C et al. A secreted Delral-Fc fusion protein functions both as an activator and Inhibitor of Notch I signaling. J Neurosci Res 2002; 68(6):655-667.
64. K1ueg KM. Muskavitch MA. Ligand-receptor interactions and trans-endocytosis of Delta, Serrate and Nocch: members of the Notch signalling pathway in Drosophila. J Cell Sci 1999; 112(Pc 19):3289-3297.
65. Parks AL, Klueg KM, Stout JR et al. Ligand endocytosis drives receptor dissociation and activation in the Notch pathway. Development 2000; 127(7):1373-1385.
66. Sun X, Artavanis-TsakonasS. The intracellular deletions of Delta and Serrate define dominant negative forms of the Drosophila Notch ligands. Development 1996; 122(8):2465-2474.
67. Hukriede NA, Gu Y, Fleming RJ. A dorninanr-negarive form of Serrate acts as a general antagonist of Notch activation. Development 1997; 124(17):3427-3437.
68. Chen MS, Obar RA. Schroeder CC et al. Multiple forms of dynamin are encoded by shibire, a Drosophila gene involved in endocytosis. Nature 1991; 351(6327):583-586.
69. van der Bliek AM. Meyerowitz EM. Dynamin-like protein encoded by the Drosophila shibire gene associated wich vesicular traffic. Nature 1991; 351(6325):411-414.
70. Seugner L, Simpson P, Haenlin M. Requirement for dynamin during Notch signaling in Drosophila neurogenesis. Dev Biol 1997; 192(2):585-598.
71. Deblandre GA, Lai EC. Kintner C. Xenopus neuralized is a ubiquicin ligase that interacts with XDelcal and regulates Notch signaling. Dev Cell 2001; 1(6):795-806.
72. Lai EC, Deblandre GA, Kintner C et al. Drosophila neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that promoces the internalization and degradation of delta. Dev Cell 2001; 1(6):783-794.
73. Itoh M. Kim CH, Palardy G et al. Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta. Dev Cell 2003; 4(1):67-82.
74. Li Y.Baker NE. The roles of cis-inactivation by Notch ligands and of neuralized during eye and bristle patterning in Drosophila. BMC Dev Biol 2004; 4:5.
75. Song R, Koo BK, Yoon KJ er al. Neuralized-2 regulates notch ligand in cooperation with mind bornb-I. J Biol Chern 2006.
76. LaVoie MJ, Selkoe DJ. The Notch ligands. Jagged and Delta. are sequentially processed by alpha- secretase and presenilin/gamma-secrctase and release signaling fragments. J Biol Chern 2003; 278(36):34427-34437.
77. Six E, Ndiaye D, Laabi Yet al. The Notch ligand Deltal is sequentially cleaved by an ADAM protease and gamma-secrerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(13):7638-7643.
78. Ikeuchi T, Sisodia SS. The Notch ligands, Delta l and Jagged2, are substrates for presenilln-dependenr "gamma-secretase" cleavage. J Biol Chern 2003; 278(10):7751-7754.
79. Kiyota T, Kinoshita T. The intracellular domain of X-Serrace-l is cleaved and suppresses primary neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Mech Dev 2004; 121(6):573-585.
80. Pfister S, Przemeck GK. Gerber JK et al. Interaction of the MAGUK family member Acvrinpl and the cytoplasmic domain of the Notch ligand DeltaI. J Mol Biol 2003; 333(2):229-235.
81. Ascano JM. BeverlyLJ, Capobianco AJ. The C-terminal PDZ-ligand ofJAGGED1 is essential for cellular cransformation. J Biol Chern 2003; 278(10):8771-8779.
82. Hock B. Bohme B, Karn T et al. PDZ-domain-mediated interaction of the Eph-related recepror tyrosine kinase EphB3 and the ras-binding protein AF6 depends on the kinase activity of the receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95(17):9779-9784.
83. Henrique D, Hirsinger E. Adam J et al. Maintenance of neuroepithelial progenitor cells by Delta-Notch signalling in the embryonic chick retina. Curr Biol 1997; 7(9):661-670.
84. de Celis JF, Bray SJ. The Abruptex domain of Notch regulates negative interactions between Notch, its ligands and Fringe. Development 2000; 127(6):1291-1302.
85. Sakamoto K, Ohara 0, Takagi M et al. Intracellular cell-autonomous association of Notch and its ligands: a novel mechanism of Notch signal modification. Dev Biol 2002; 241(2):313-326.
86. Okajima T, Irvine KD. Regulation of notch signaling by o-llnked fucose. Cell 2002; 111(6):893-904.
87. Okajima T, Xu A, Irvine KD. Modulation of notch-ligand binding by protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 and fringe. J Biol Chern 2003; 278(43):42340-42345.
88. Shi S, Stanley P. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 is an essential component of Notch sigualing pathways. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(9):5234-5239.
89. Chen J, Moloney DJ, Stanley P. Fringe modulation of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling requires the action of beta 4galactosyltransferase-1. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 2001; 98(24):13716-13721.
90. Bruckner K, Perez L, Clausen H et al. Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature 2000; 406(6794):411-415.
91. Moloney DJ, Panin VM, Johnston SH et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 2000; 406(6794):369-375.
92. Hicks C, Johnston SH, diSibio G er al. Fringe differentially modulates Jagged1 and Delta.l signalling through Notch I and Notch2. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2(8):515-520.
93. Weinmaster, Kintner. Modulation of notch signaling during somitogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003; 19:367-395.
94. Panin VM, Shao L, Lei L et al. Notch ligands are substrates for protein 0-fucosyltransferase-1 and Fringe. J Biol Chern 2002; 277(33):29945-29952.
95. Evrard YA, Lun Y, Aulehla A et al. lunatic fringe is an essential mediator of somite segmentation and patterning. Nature 1998; 394(6691) :377-381.
96. Zhang N, Gridley T. Defects in somite formation in lunatic fringe-deficient mice. Nature 1998; 394(6691 ):374-377.
97. Zhang N, Norton CR, Gridley T. Segmentation defects of Notch pathway mutants and absence of a synergistic phenotype in lunatic fringe/radical fringe double mutant mice. Genesis 2002; 33(1):21-28.
98. Aulehla A, Johnson RL. Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation. Dev Biol 1999; 207(1):49-61.
99. Forsberg H, Crozet F, Brown NA. Waves of mouse Lunatic fringe expression, in four-hour cycles at two-hour intervals, precede somite boundary formation. Curr Biol 1998; 8(18):1027-1030.
100. McGrew MJ, Dale JK, Fraboulet S et al. The lunatic fringe gene is a target of the molecular clock linked to somite segmentation in avian embryos. Curr Biol 1998; 8(17):979-982.
101. Barrantes IB, Elia AJ, Wunsch K et al. Interaction between Notch signalling and Lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse. Curr Biol 1999; 9(9):470-480.
102. Dunwoodie SL, Clements M, Sparrow DB et al. Axial skeletal defects caused by mutation in the spondylocosral dysplasia/pudgy gene Dll3 are associated with disruption of the segmentation clock within the presomitic mesoderm. Development 2002; 129(7):1795-1806.
103. Kusumi K, Mimoto MS, Covello KL et al. Dll3 pudgy mutation differentially disrupts dynamic expression of somite genes. Genesis 2004; 39(2):115-121.
104. Dale JK, Maroro M, Dcqueant ML et al. Periodic notch inhibition by lunatic fringe underlies the chick segmentation clock. Nature 2003; 421(6920):275-278.
105. Serth K, Schusrer-Gossler K, Cordes Ret al. Transcriptional oscillation of lunatic fringe is essential for somitogenesis. Genes Dev 2003; 17(7):912-925.
106. Dunwoodie SL, Henrique D, Harrison SM et al. Mouse D1l3: a novel divergent Delta gene which may complement the function of other Delta homologues during early pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development 1997; 124(16):3065-3076.
107. Lissemore JL, Starmer WT. Phylogenetic analysis of vertebrate and invertebrate Delta/Serrate/LAG-2 (DSL) proteins. Mol Phylogenet Evol1999; 11(2):308-319.
108. Qi H, Rand MD, Wu X et al. Processing of the notch ligand delta by the metalloprotease Kuzbanian. Science 1999; 283(5398):91-94.
109. Bland CE, Kimberly P, Rand MD. Notch-induced proteolysis and nuclear localization of the Delta ligand. J Biol Chern 2003; 278(16):13607-13610.
110. Ikeuchi T, Sisodia SS. Cell-free generation of the notch 1 intracellular domain (NICD) and APP-CTfgamma: evidence for distinct intramembranous "gamma-secrctase" activities. Neuromolecular Med 2002; 1(1):43-54.
111. Koo BK, Lim HS, Song R et al. Mind bomb 1 is essential for generating functional Notch ligands to activate Notch. Development 2005; 132(15):3459-3470.
112. Harris RJ, Spellman MW. O-linked fucose and other posttranslational modifications unique to EGF modules. Glycobiology 1993; 3(3):219-224. Role ofDelta-Like-3 in Mammalian Somitogenesis and Vertebral Column Formation 111
113. Ladi E, NicholsJT, Ge W et al. The divergent DSL ligand Dll3 does not activate Notch signaling but cell autonomously attenuates signaling induced by other DSL ligands.J Cell Biol 2005; 170(6):983-992.
114. Hrabe de Angelis M. Mcintyre J2nd, Gossler A. Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue DIll. Nature 1997; 386(6626):717-721.
115. Kusumi K, Sun ES, Kerrebrock AWet al. The mouse pudgy mutation disrupts Delta homologue D 113 and initiation of early somite boundaries. Nat Genet 1998; 19(3):274-278.
116. Bulman MP, Kusumi K, Frayling TM et al. Mutations in the human delta homologue, DLL3, cause axial skeletal defects in spondylocostal dysostosis. Nat Genet 2000; 24(4):438-441.
117. Bettenhausen B, Hrabe de Angelis M, Simon D et al. Transient and restricted expression during mouse embryogenesis of Dill, a murine gene closely related to Drosophila Delta. Development 1995; 121(8):2407-2418.
118. Pourquie 0, Tam PP. A nomenclature for prospective somites and phases of cyclic gene expression in the presomitic mesoderm. Dev Cell 2001; 1(5):619-620.
119. Gruneberg H. Genetical studies on the skeleton of the mouse XXIX Pudgy. Genet Res 1961; 2:384-393.
120. Shinkai Y,Tsuji T, Kawamoto Yet al. New mutant mouse with skeletal deformities caused by mutation in delta like 3 (d1l3) gene. Exp Anim 2004; 53(2):129-136.
121. Sparrow DB. Clements M, Withington SL et al. Diverse requirements for Notch signalling in mammals. Int J Dev Biol 2002; 46(4):365-374.
122. Aoyama H, Asamoto K. The developmental fate of the rostral/caudal half of a somite for vertebra and rib formation: experimental confirmation of the resegrnentation theory using chick-quail chimeras. Mech Dev 2000; 99(1-2):71-82.
123. Saga Y, Takeda H. The making of the somite: molecular events in vertebrate segmentation. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2(11):835-845.
124. Takahashi Y. Inoue T, Gossler A ec al. Feedback loops comprising Dill. Dll3 and Mesp2 and differential involvement of Psenl are essential for rostrocaudal patterning of somites. Development 2003; 130(18):4259-4268.
125. Takahashi Y,Koizumi K. Takagi A et al. Mesp2 initiates somite segmentation through the Notch signalling pathway. Nat Genet 2000; 25(4):390-396.
126. Saga Y, Hata N, Koseki H et al. Mesp2: a novel mouse gene expressed in the presegmented mesoderm and essential for segmentation initiation. Genes Dev 1997; 11(14):1827-1839.
127. Nomura-Kitabayashi A, Takahashi Y, Kitajima S et al. Hypomorphic Mesp allele distinguishes establishment of rostrocaudal polarity and segment border formation in somirogenesis. Development 2002; 129(10):2473-2481.
128. Jouve C, Palmeirim I, Henrique D et al. Notch signalling is required for cyclic expressionof the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm. Development 2000; 127(7):1421-1429.
129. Bessho Y, Sakata R, Komatsu S et al. Dynamic expression and essential functions of Hes7 in somite segmentation. Genes Dev 2001; 15(20):2642-2647.
130. Bessho Y, Hirata H, Masamizu Y er al. Periodic repression by the bHLH factor Hes7 is an essential mechanism for the somite segmentation clock. Genes Dev 2003; 17(12):1451-1456.
131. Leimeister C, Dale K, Fischer A er al. Oscillating expression of c-Hey2 in the presomitic mesoderm suggeststhat the segmentation clock may use combinatorial signaling through multiple interacting bHLH factors. Dev Biol 2000; 227(1):91-103.
132. Turnpenny PD, Bulman MP, FraylingTM et al.A gene for autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis maps to 19q13.I-q13.3. AmJ Hum Genet 1999; 65(1):175-182.
133. Turnpenny PD. Whittock N, Duncan J et al. Novel mutations in DLL3, a somitogenesis gene encoding a ligand for the Notch signalling pathway, cause a consistent pattern of abnormal vertebral segmentation in spondylocostal dysosrosis.J Med Genet 2003; 40(5):333-339.
134. Whittock NY, Ellard S, DuncanJ er al. Pseudodominant inheritance of spondylocostal dysosrosis type 1 caused by two familial delta-like 3 mutations. Clin Genet 2004; 66(1):67-72.
135. Bonafe L, Giunta C, Gassner M ct al. A cluster of autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis caused by three newly identified DLL3 mutations segregating in a small village. Clin Genet 2003; 64(1):28-35.
136. Karlstrom H, Beatus P, Dannaeus K er al. A CADASIL-mutated Notch 3 recepror exhibits impaired intracellular trafficking and maturation but normal ligand-induced signaling. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(26):17119-17124.
137. Whittock NY, Sparrow DB, Wouters MA et al. Mutated MESP2 Causes Spondylocostal Dysostosis in Humans. AmJ Hum Genet 2004; 74(6):1249-1254.
138. SparrowDB, Chapman G, Wouters MA et al. Mutation of the LUNATIC FRINGE gene in humans causes spondylocostal dysostosis with a severe vertebral phenotype. AmJ Hum Genet 2006; 78(1):28-37.
139. Strirnmer K, von Haeseler A. Q!:artet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 1996; 13:964-969.
140. Jones DT, Taylor WR. Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Cornput Appl Biosci 1992; 8(3):275-282.
141. Thompson JD. Higgins DG. Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity ofprogressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting. position-specificgap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22(22):4673-4680.
142. Williams R. Lendahl U. Lardelli M. Complementary and combinatorial patterns of Notch gene family expression during early mouse development. Mech Dev 1995; 53(3):357-368.
143. Reaume AG. Conlon RA. Zirngibl R et al. Expression analysis of a Notch homologue in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 1992; 154(2):377-387.
144. Swiatek PJ. Lindsell CE, del Arno FF et al. Notch I is essential for postimplantation development in mice. Genes Dev 1994; 8(6):707-719.
145. Hamada Y,Kadokawa Y.Okabe M et al. Mutation in ankyrin repeats of the mouse Notch2 gene induces early embryonic lethality. Development 1999; 126(15):3415-3424.
146. McCright B. Gao X. Shen L et al. Defects in development of the kidney. heart and eye vasculature in mice homozygous for a hypomorphic Notch2 mutation. Development 2001; 128(4):491-502.
147. Shirayoshi Y.YuasaY, Suzuki T et al. Proto-oncogene of int-B, a mouse Notch homologue. is expressed in endothelial cells during early embryogenesis. Genes Cells 1997; 2(3):213-224.
148. Krebs LT. Xue Y. Norton CR et al. Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev 2000; 14(11):1343-1352.
149. Shutter JR, Scully S. Fan W et al. D1l4. a novel Notch ligand expressed in arterial endothelium. Genes Dev 2000; 14(11):1313-1318.
150. Xue Y, Gao X. Lindsell CE et al. Embryonic lethality and vascular defects in mice lacking the Notch ligand Jagged1. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8(5):723-730.
151. Jiang R, Lan Y, Chapman HD et al. Defects in limb. craniofacial and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice. Genes Dev 1998; 12(7):1046-1057.
152. Aoyama H, Asamoto K. Determination of somite cells: independence of cell differentiation and morphogenesis. Development 1988; 104(1):15-28.
153. Baron M. An overview of the Notch signalling pathway. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2003; 14(2):113-119.