Perspectives on organizational justice: Concept clarification, social context integration, time and links with morality

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-126

  Fortin, Marion ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43149101038     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: 14682370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00231.x     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York : Academic Press, pp. 267 299.
2. Ambrose, M. Arnaud, A. (2005). Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 59 84.
3. Ambrose, M. Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295 305.
4. Ambrose, M.L. Cropanzano, R. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 266 275.
5. Ambrose, M.L. Schminke, M. (2001). Are flexible organizations the death knell for the future of procedural justice? In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 229 244.
6. Ambrose, M., Hess, R.L. Ganesan, S. (2007). The relationship between justice and attitudes: an examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 21 36.
7. Aryee, S., Chen, Z.X., Sun, L.-Y. Debrah, Y.A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191 201.
8. Bies, R.J. (1986). Identifying principles of interactional justice: the case of corporate recruiting. Paper presented at the Moving Beyond Equity Theory: New Directions in Research on Justice in Organizations, Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
9. Bies, R.J. (1987). Beyond 'voice': the influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 3 14.
10. Bies, R.J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: the sacred and the profane. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. San Francisco : Stanford University Press, pp. 89 118.
11. Bies, R.J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 85 112.
12. Bies, R.J. Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R., Sheppard, B. Bazerman, M. (eds), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1. Greenwich : JAI Press, pp. 43 55.
13. Bies, R.J. Shapiro, D.L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgements: the influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199 219.
14. Bies, R.J. Shapiro, D.L. (1988). Voice and justification: their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676 685.
15. Bies, R.J. Tripp, T.M. (1995). Beyond distrust: 'getting even' and the need for revenge. In Kramer, R.M. Tyler, T.R. (eds), Trust in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA : Sage, pp. 246 260.
16. Bies, R.J. Tripp, T.M. (2001). A passion for justice: the rationality and morality of revenge. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Bies, R.J. Tyler, T.R. (1993). The 'litigation mentality' in organizations: a test of alternative psychological explanations. Organization Science, 4, 352 366.
18. Bies, R.J., Shapiro, D.L. Cummings, L.L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15, 381 399.
19. Blader, S. Tyler, T.R. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 329 354.
20. Blader, S.L. (2002). Bias in justice judgments: outcomes and identity as predictors of process fairness evaluations. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO, August.
21. Blader, S.L. Tyler, T.R. (2000). A four-component model of procedural justice: what makes a process fair in work settings? Paper presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, August.
22. Blader, S.L. Tyler, T.R. (2002). How do employees define procedural justice? Procedural function and source as dimensions of procedural justice evaluations. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON, Canada, April.
23. Blader, S.L., Chang, C.C. Tyler, T.R. (2001). Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 295 311.
24. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. NewYork : Wiley.
25. Bobocel, D.R. Holmvall, C.M. (2001). Are interactional justice and procedural justice different? Framing the debate. In Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D.D. Skarlicki, D.P. (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, CT : IAP, pp. 85 108.
26. Brockner, J. Wiesenfeld, B. (2005). How, when, and why does outcome favorability interact with procedural fairness? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 525 553.
27. Brockner, J. Wiesenfeld, B.M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decision: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189 208.
28. Brockner, J., Ackermann, G. Fairchild, G. (2001). When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating differences. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 170 212.
29. Brockner, J., Konovsky, M.A., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C. Bies, R.J. (1994). The interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on the victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397 409.
30. Brockner, J., Tyler, T.R. Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived unfairness: the higher they are, the harder they fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241 261.
31. Byrne, Z.S. Cropanzano, R. (2001). the history of organizational justice: the founders speak. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3 26.
32. Chen, C.C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: a Sino-US comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408 428.
33. Cohen, R.L. Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In Greenberg, J. Cohen, R.L. (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. New York : Academic Press, pp. 1 41.
34. Cohen-Charash, Y. Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278 321.
35. Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386 400.
36. Colquitt, J.A. Greenberg, J. (2001). Doing justice to organizational justice: forming and applying fairness judgments. In Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D.D. Skarlicki, D.P. (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, CT : IAP, pp. 217 242.
37. Colquitt, J.A. Jackson, C.L. (2006). Justice in teams: the context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 868 899.
38. Colquitt, J.A. Shaw, J.C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 113 152.
39. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O. Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425 445.
40. Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J. Scott, B.A. (2005a). Organizational justice: where do we stand? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 589 619.
41. Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J. Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2005b). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Colquitt, J.A., Noe, R.A. Jackson, C.L. (2002). Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83 109.
43. Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., Judge, T.A. Shaw, J.C. (2006). Justice and personality: using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110 127.
44. Conlon, D.E., Meyer, C.J. Nowakowski, J.M. (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 301 327.
45. Cropanzano, R. Ambrose, M.L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 119 151.
46. Cropanzano, R. Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: tunnelling through the maze. In Cooper, C.L. Robertson, I.T. (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2. New York : Wiley, pp. 317 372.
47. Cropanzano, R. Prehar, C.A. (2001). Emerging justice concerns in an era of changing psychological contracts. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 245 270.
48. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z.S., Bobocel, R. Rupp, D. (2001a). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164 209.
49. Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B. Folger, R. (2005a). Self-interest: defining and understanding a human motive. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 985 991.
50. Cropanzano, R., Paddock, L., Rupp, D.E., Bagger, J. Baldwin, A. (2007). How regulatory focus impacts the process-by-outcome interaction for perceived fairness and emotions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 36 51.
51. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D.E., Mohler Schminke, M. (2001b). Three roads to organizational justice. In Ferris, G.R. (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 19. New York : Elsevier Science, pp. 1 113.
52. Cropanzano, R., Slaughter, J.E. Bachiochi, P.D. (2005b). Organizational justice and black applicants' reactions to affirmative action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1168 1184.
53. Davidson, M. Friedman, R.A. (1998). When excuses don't work: the persistent injustice effect among black managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 154 183.
54. De Cremer, D. Van Hiel, A. (2006). Effects of another person's fair treatment on one's own emotions and behaviors: the moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 231 249.
55. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137 149.
56. Fletchenhauer, D. Huang, X. (2004). Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1015 1029.
57. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: combined impact on 'voice' and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108 119.
58. Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In Schminke, M. (ed.), Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 13 34.
59. Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In Gilliland, S., Steiner, D. Skarlicki, D. (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, CT : IAP, pp. 3 34.
60. Folger, R. Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. London : Sage.
61. Folger, R. Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: justice as accountability. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 1 55.
62. Folger, R. Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115 130.
63. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R. Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 215 245.
64. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J. Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of 'voice' and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253 2261.
65. Fortin, M. Fellenz, M.R. (2007). Hypocrisies of fairness: towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, published online 21 March.
66. French, W. (1964). The Personnel Management Process: Human Resources Administration. BostonMA : Houghton Mifflin.
67. Gillespie, J.Z. Greenberg, J. (2005). Are the goals of organizational justice self-interested? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 179 213.
68. Gilliland, S.W., Benson, I., L. Schepers, D.H. (1998). A rejection threshold in justice. evaluations: effects on judgment and decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 6, 113 131.
69. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J. Cohen, R.L. (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behaviour. New York : Academic Press, pp. 389 435.
70. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9 22.
71. Greenberg, J. (1988). Equity and workplace status: a field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606 613.
72. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399 432.
73. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 79 103.
74. Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288 297.
75. Greenberg, J. (2001a). Studying organizational justice cross-culturally: fundamental challenges. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 365 375.
76. Greenberg, J. (2001b). The seven loose can(n)ons of organizational justice. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 245 272.
77. Greenberg, J. Bies, R.J. (1992). Establishing the role of empirical studies of organizational justice in philosophical enquiries into business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 433 444.
78. Greenberg, J. Cohen, R.L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In Greenberg, J. Cohen, R.L. (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. New York : Academic Press, pp. 437 469.
79. Greenberg, J. Wiethoff, C. (2001). Organizational justice as proaction and reaction: implications for research and application. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 271 302.
80. Guest, D. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: an analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 541 555.
81. Heath, C., Knez, M. Camerer, C. (1993). The strategic management of the entitlement process in the employment relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 75 93.
82. Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81 94.
83. Homans, G.C. (1961). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
84. Hosmer, L.T. Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational justice: a behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15 (1 67 91.
85. International Personality Item Pool : a scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Available at: http://ipip.ori.org/.
86. Jasso, G. Webster, M. Jr. (1997). Double standards in just earnings for male and female workers. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60 (1 66 78.
87. Kim, T.-Y. Leung, K. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall fairness: a cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 83 95.
88. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development. SanFrancisco : Harper & Row.
89. Konovsky, M.A. Pugh, S.D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656 670.
90. Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chuang, Y.C., Berent, M.K. Carnot, C.G. (1993). Attitude strength: one construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132 1151.
91. Lam, S.S.K., Schaubroeck, J. Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1 18.
92. Lamertz, K. (2002). The social construction of fairness: social influence and sense making in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 19 37.
93. Lerner, M.J. (1974). Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In Huston, T. (ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction. NewYork : Academic Press.
94. Lerner, M.J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: a Fundamental Delusion. NewYork : Plenum.
95. Lerner, M.J. (1981). The justice motive inhuman relations: some thoughts of what we know and need to know about justice. In Lerner, M.J. Lerner, S.C. (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. New York : Plenum, pp. 11 35.
96. Lerner, M.J. Miller, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030 1051.
97. Leung, K. (2005). How generalizable are justice effects across cultures? In Greenberg, J. Colquitt, J.A. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 555 586.
98. Leung, K. Tong, K.K. (2004). Justice across cultures: a three-stage model for intercultural negotiation. In Gelfand, M. Brett, J. (eds), The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 313 333.
99. Leventhal, G.S. (1976a). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J., Spence, J.T. Carson, R.C. (eds), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ : General Learning Press, pp. 211 239.
100. Leventhal, G.S. (1976b). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Berkowitz, L. Walster, E. (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York : Academic Press, pp. 91 131.
101. Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K.J., Greenberg, M.S. Willis, R.H. (eds), Social Exchanges: Advances in Theory and Research. New York : Plenum, pp. 27 55.
102. Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J. Fry, W.R. (1980). Beyond fairness: a theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction. New York : Springer, pp. 167 218.
103. Liao, H. Rupp, D.E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242 256.
104. Lind, E.A. (2001a). Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgements as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 56 88.
105. Lind, E.A. (2001b). Thinking critically about justice judgments. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 220 226.
106. Lind, E.A. Tyler, T.R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. NewYork : Plenum.
107. Lind, E.A. Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: towards a general theory of uncertainty management. In Staw, B.M. Kramer, R.M. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24. Boston, MA : Elsevier, pp. 181 223.
108. Lowe, R.H. Vodanovich, S.J. (1995). A field study of distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10 (1 99 115.
109. Lukes, S. (1974). Power - A Radical View, 1st edition. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
110. Lukes, S. (2005). Power - A Radical View, 2nd edition. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
111. MacCoun, R.J. 2005. Voice, control, and belonging: the double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 1, 171 201.
112. Masterson, S.S., Lewis-Mcclear, K., Goldman, B.B. Taylor, S.M. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738 748.
113. McFarlin, D.B. Sweeney, P.D. (2001). Cross-cultural applications of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 67 96.
114. Meara, N.M. (2001). Just and virtuous leaders and organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 227 234.
115. Molm, L.D., Quist, T.M. Wiseley, P.A. (1993). Reciprocal justice and strategies of exchange. Social Forces, 72 (1 19 44.
116. Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N. Martin, C.L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131 141.
117. Naumann, S.E. Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: development and test of a multiple model. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881 889.
118. Olkkonen, M.-E. Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 202 215.
119. Paterson, J.M., Green, A. Cary, J. (2002). The measurement of organizational justice in organizational change programmes: a reliability, validity and context-sensitivity assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 393 408.
120. Patient, D. Skarlicki, D.P. (2007). interactional justice in communicating negative news: the role of communicator empathic concern and moral development. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Philadelphia, August.
121. Pfeffer, J. Langton, N. (1993). The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and turnover among college administrators. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 753 763.
122. Price, K.H., Lavelle, J.J., Henley, A.B., Cocchiara, F.K. Buchanan, F.R. (2006). Judging the fairness of voice-based participation across multiple and interrelated stages of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 212 226.
123. Reb, J., Goldman, B., Kray, L.J. Cropanzano, R. (2006). Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. Personnel Psychology, 59, 31 64.
124. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S.J. Bebeau, M.J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 644 659.
125. Roberson, Q.M. (2006). Justice in teams: the activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 177 192.
126. Roch, S.G. Shanock, L.R. (2006). Organizational justice in an exchange framework: clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management, 32, 299 322.
127. Rupp, D.E. Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925 946.
128. Sampson, E.E. (1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45 64.
129. Saunders, M. Thornhill, A. (2006). Forced employment contract change and the psychological contract. Employee Relations, 28, 449 467.
130. Saunders, M.N., Thornhill, A. Lewis, P. (2002). Understanding employees' reactions to the management of change: an exploration through an organizational justice framework. Irish Journal of Management, 23 (1 85 108.
131. Schminke, M. Ambrose, M.L. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190 1207.
132. Schmitt, M. (1998). Gerechtingkeit und Solidaritaet im wiedervereinigten Deutschland. In Reichle, B. Schmitt, M. (eds), Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit und Moral. Weinheim : Juventa, pp. 87 99.
133. Schmitt, M., Neumann, R. Montada, L. (1995). Justice sensitivity. Social Justice Research, 8, 385 407.
134. Shapiro, D.L. (2001). The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the 'wheels' already invented and the voices of the injustice victims. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 235 242.
135. Shapiro, D.L. Kirkman, B.L. (1999). Employees' reaction to the change to work teams: the influence of 'anticipatory' injustice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 51 66.
136. Shapiro, D.L. Kirkman, B.L. (2001). Anticipatory injustice: the consequences of expecting injustice in the workplace. In Greenberg, J. Cropanzano, R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, pp. 152 178.
137. Shaw, J.C., Wild, E. Colquitt, J.A. (2003). To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444 458.
138. Sheppard, B.H., Lewicki, R.J. Minton, J.W. (1992). Organizational Justice: The Search for Fairness in the Workplace. Lexington, MA : Lexington Books.
139. Singer, M. (1993). Fairness in Personnel Selection. Aldershot : Avebury.
140. Skitka, L.J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588.
141. Skitka, L.J. Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: a test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419.
142. Skitka, L.J., Winquist, J. Hutchinson, S. (2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16, 309 341.
143. Sweeney, P.D. McFarlin, D.B. (1993). Workers' evaluation of the 'ends' and the 'means': an examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23 40.
144. Tax, S.S., Brown, S.W. Chandrashekaran, M. (1998). Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62, 60 76.
145. Taylor, M.S. (2001). Reflections on fairness: continuing the progression of justice research and practice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 243 253.
146. Thibaut, J. Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
147. Turillo, C.J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J.J., Umphress, E. Gee, J. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 839 865.
148. Tyler, T.R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: a test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333 344.
149. Tyler, T.R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 301 335.
150. Tyler, T.R. Bies, R.J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: the interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. (ed.), Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 77 98.
151. Tyler, T.R. Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia, PA : Psychology Press.
152. Tyler, T.R. Blader, S. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 813 838.
153. Tyler, T.R. Blader, S. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349 361.
154. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D.D. Skarlicki, D.P. (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, CT : IAP, pp. 63 108.
155. Van den Bos, K. (2002). Assimilation and contrast in organizational justice: the role of primed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 866 880.
156. Van den Bos, K. Lind, E.A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others' treatment: self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324 1333.
157. Van den Bos, K. Lind, E.A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In Zanna, M.P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 34. Boston, MA : Elsevier, pp. 1 60.
158. Van den Bos, K., Burrows, J.W., Umphress, E., Folger, R., Lavelle, J.J., Eaglestone, J., et al 2005). Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference in social justice: the influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors. Social Justice Research, 18, 99 120.
159. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R. Wilke, H.A.M. (1996). The consistency rule and the voice effect: the influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 411 428.
160. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H.A.M., Lind, E.A. Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493 1503.
161. Watson, G.W. (2003). Ideology and the symbolic construction of fairness in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16, 154 168.
162. Zohar, D. (1995). The justice perspective of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 487 495.