Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct?

Handbook of Organizational Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 59-84

  Ambrose, Maureen L ^a   Arnaud, Anke ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118965975     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
3. Ambrose, M. L., & Hess, R. L. (2001, July). Organizational justice and customer satisfaction. Paper presented at the International Roundtable on Organizational Justice, Vancouver, Canada.
4. Ball, G. A., Trevino, L. K., & Sims, H. P. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 299-323.
5. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296-304.
6. Bobocel, D. R., & Holmvall, C. (2001). Are interactional justice and procedural justice different? Framing the debate. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 85-110). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7. Boldizar, J. P, Perry, D. G., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Gender and reward distributions: A test of two hypotheses. Sex Roles, 19, 569-579.
8. Chatman, J., & Jehn, K. (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of Management Journal, 37, 522-554.
9. Chen, C. C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408-429.
10. Chiu, C. (1990). Distributive justice among Hong Kong Chinese college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 649-657.
11. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
12. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
13. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
14. Cornelius, G. W. (1985). Evaluation fairness and work motivation. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois, Champaign.
15. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In L. T. Robertson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119-151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58, 164-209.
18. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 1-113). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science.
19. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributee justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Dittrich, J. E., & Carrell, M. R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee satisfaction, and department absence and turnover rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 29-40.
21. Drake, D. G., & Lawrence, J. A. (2000). Equality and distribution of inheritance in families. Social Justice Research, 13, 271-290.
22. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
23. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
24. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
25. Garland, H. (1973). The effects of piece-rate underpayment and overpayment on job performance: A test of equity theory with a new induction procedure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 325-334.
26. Giacobbe-Miller, J. K., Miller, D. J., & Victorov, V. I. (1998). A comparison of Russian and U.S. pay allocation decisions, distributive justice judgments, and productivity under different payment conditions. Personnel Psychology, 51, 137-164.
27. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
28. Greenberg, J. (1986b). The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 337-351). New York: Plenum.
29. Greenberg, J. (1988a). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606-614.
30. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
31. Greenberg, I. (2001). Setting the justice agenda: Seven unanswered questions about "w'hat, why, and how." Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 210-219.
32. Greenberg, J., & Ornstein, S. (1983). High status job title as compensation for underpayment: A test of equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 285-297.
33. Hauenstein, N. M. T., McGonigle, T., & Flinder, S. W. (2001). A meta-analysis of the relationship between procedural justice and distributive justice: Implications for justice research. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13, 39-56.
34. Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Participation in task evaluation procedures: The effects of influential opinion expression and knowledge of evaluation criteria on attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research, 1, 235-249.
35. Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K., & Isaka, H. (1988). Universalism in lay conceptions of distributive justice: A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 51-64.
36. Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (1995). Leadership and empowerment: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 48, 127-147.
37. Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
38. Koys, D. J. (1988). Human resource management and a culture of respect: Effects on employees' organizational commitment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 57-69.
39. Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (2002). The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences inorganizationaljusticejudgments. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 89, 906-925.
40. LaTour, S. (1978). Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1531-1545.
41. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
42. Leventhal, G. S. (1976a). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press.
43. Leventhal, G. S. (1976b). Fairness is social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
44. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
45. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167-213). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In M. S. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47. Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (1998). The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and others' unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1-22.
48. Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189-210.
49. Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolutions of conflicts of interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 338-350.
50. Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19-29.
51. Lind, E. A., Lissak., R. E., & Conlon, A. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural justice judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 338-350.
52. Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1989). The perception of justice: Tort litigants' views of trial, court-annexed arbitration, and judicial settlement conferences. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
53. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
54. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. L. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 99-114.
55. Linkey, H. E., & Alexander, S. (1998). Need norm, demographic influence, social role, and justice judgment. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 17, 152-162.
56. Malatesta, R. M., & Byrne, Z. S. (1997, April). The impact of formal and interactional justice on organizational outcomes. Poster session presented for the twelfth annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
57. Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 822-839.
58. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748.
59. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
60. Miller, C. E., & Komorita, S. S. (1995). Reward allocation in task-performing groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 80-91.
61. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational fairness and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
62. Moorman, R. FT, Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351-357.
63. Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Relationship between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533-552.
64. Mowday, R. T. (1987). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.) Motivation and work (4th ed., pp. 89-110). New York: McGraw-Hill.
65. Oldham, G. R., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. L., Stepina, L. P., & Brand, J. F. (1986). Relations between job fact comparisons and employee reactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 28-47.
66. Price, J. L., & Meuller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
67. Pritchard, R. A., Dunnette, M. D., & Jorgenson, D. O. (1972). Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 75-94.
68. Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). Integrating psychological contracts and multifocused organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925-946.
69. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190-1207.
70. Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 3-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71. Shapiro, D. (1993). Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice researchers by re-evaluating what it means to have one's view "considered"; Implications for third-party managers. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Shapiro, D. (2001). The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the "wheels" already invented and the voices of the injustice victims. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 235-242.
73. Singer, M. (1989). Determinants of perceived fairness on selection practices: An organizational justice perspective. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 477-495.
74. Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. R. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119-127.
75. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40.
76. Sweeney, P. D., Me Farlin, D. B., & Cotton, J. L. (1993). Locus of control as a moderator of the relationship between perceived influence and procedural justice. Human Relations, 44, 333-342.
77. Taylor, M. (2001). Reflections on fairness: Continuing the progression of justice research and practice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 243-253.
78. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
79. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
80. Tornblom, K. Y., & Vermunt, R. (1999). An integrative perspective on social justice: Distributive and procedural fairness evaluations of positive and negative outcome allocations. Social Justice Research, 12, 39-64.
81. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
82. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1072.
83. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating the outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493-1503.
84. Wagstaff, G. F., Huggins, J. P., & Perfect, T. J. (1993). Equity, equality, and need in the adult family. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 439-444.
85. Walker, L., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1979). The relationship between procedural and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review, 65, 1401-1420.