The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1190-1207

  Schminke, Marshall ^b   Ambrose, Maureen L ^a   Noel, Terry W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031256491     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/256932     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2: 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
2. Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. 1978. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42: 93-104.
3. Bies, R. 1985. Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting. Paper presented as part of the symposium "Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations," at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
4. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & B. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 1: 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. 1988. Voice and justification: The influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 676-685.
6. Brady, F. N. 1985. A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/ society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10: 568-576.
7. Brady, F. N. 1990. Ethical managing: Rules and results. New York: Macmillan.
8. Brady, F. N., & Wheeler, G. E. 1996. An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 927-940.
9. Brockner, J., Greenberg, J., & Brockner, A. 1986. Layoffs, equity theory, and work performance: Further evidence of the impact of survivor guilt. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 373-384.
10. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., & DeWitt, R. L. 1992. Layoffs, job insecurity, and survivors' work effort: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 413-425.
11. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. 1996. An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 189-208.
12. Folger, R. 1986. Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations: 145-162. New York: Plenum.
13. Folger, R. 1987. Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1: 143-159.
14. Gilligan, C. 1977. In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47: 481-516.
15. Gilliland, S. W. 1994. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 691-701.
16. Greenberg, J. 1986. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 340-342.
17. Greenberg, J. 1988. Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 606-613.
18. Greenberg, J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16: 399-432.
19. Greenberg, J. 1991. Using explanations to manage impressions of performance appraisal fairness. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4: 51-60.
20. Greenberg, J. 1993. The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management: 79-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. 1987. A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12: 222-234.
22. Joy, V.L., & Witt, L. A. 1992. Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice and distributive justice relationship. Group and Organization Management, 17: 297-308.
23. Kohlberg, L. 1984. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
24. Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. 1991. The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 698-707.
25. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Early, P. 1990. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 952-959.
26. Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. 1985. Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 19-29.
27. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
28. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 626-637.
29. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. 1989. A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 424-432.
30. Mowday, R. T. 1983. Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In R. Steers & L. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (3d ed.): 91-113. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Oldham, G. R., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. L., Stepina, L. P., & Brand, J. F. 1986. Relations between job fact comparisons and employee reactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38: 28-47.
33. Oldham, G. R., Nottenburg, G., Kassner, M. K., Ferris, G., Fedor, D., & Masters, M. 1982. The selection and consequences of job comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29: 84-111.
34. Rasinski, K. A. 1987. What is fair is fair - Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 201-211
35. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36. Rest, J. R. 1986. Moral development: Advances in theory and research. New York: Praeger.
37. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. 1993. Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 23-40.
38. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Trevino, L. K. 1992. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17: 647-676.
40. Tyler, T. 1990. Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Tyler, T. 1988. What is procedural justice? Law and Society Review, 22: 301-335.
42. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 25: 115-192. New York: Academic Press.
43. Tyler, T. R., & Schuller, R. 1990. A relational model of authority in work organizations: The psychology of procedural justice. Unpublished manuscript, American Bar Foundation, Chicago.
44. Vecchio, R. P. 1981. An individual-differences interpretation of the conflicting predictions generated by equity theory and expectancy theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 470-481.
45. Velasquez, M. G. 1992. Business ethics: Concepts and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46. Witt, L. A., & Broach, D. 1993. Exchange ideology as a moderator of the procedural justice-satisfaction relationship. Journal of Social Psychology, 133: 97-103.