The consistency rule and the voice effect: The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 411-428

  Van Den Bos, Kees ^a   Vermunt, Riël ^b   Wilke, Henk A M ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030535782     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<411::AID-EJSP766>3.0.CO;2-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296-304.
2. Crosby, F. (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-112.
3. Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, 38, 643-663.
4. deCarufel, A., & Schopler, J. (1979). Evaluation of outcome improvement resulting from threats and appeals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 662-673.
5. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of 'voice' and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
6. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of 'voice' and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253-2261.
7. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
8. Furby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed.), Justice: views from the social sciences, (pp. 153-203). New York: Plenum.
9. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen (Eds), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press.
10. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
11. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Lawler, E. E., III (1968). Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 596-610.
13. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory?: New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg and R. H. Willis (Eds), Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 27-54). New York: Plenum.
14. Leventhal, G. S., & Whiteside, H. D. (1973). Equity and the use of reward to elicit high performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 75-83.
15. Lind, E. A. (1992, March). The fairness heuristic: Rationality and 'relationality' in procedural evaluations. Paper Presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economies, Irvine, CA.
16. Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural justice, disputing, and reactions to legal authorities (ABF Working Paper No. 9403). Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
17. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Early, P. C (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
18. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & De Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
19. Lind, E. A., Maccoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants' evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system. Law and Society Review, 24, 953-996.
20. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
21. Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979). Participation in decision-making: One more look. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 265-339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22. Pritchard, R. A. (1969). Equity theory: A review and a critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 176-211.
23. Schweiger, D. M., & Leana, C. R. (1986). Participation in decision making. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 147-166). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
24. Stevens, J. P. (1990). Intermediate statistics: a modern approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
27. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
29. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
30. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego: Academic Press.
31. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.