Predicting Team Performance: Testing a Model in a Field Setting

Journal for Specialists in Group Work

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 185-197

  Kline, Theresa J B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345888555     PISSN: 01933922     EISSN: 15496295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01933920108415737     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bagozzi, R., and Yi, Y., 1990. Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices:The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75:547–560.
2. Campbell, J., 1982. Editorial:Some remarks from the outgoing editor. Journal of Applied psychology, 67:691–700.
3. Crampton, S., and Wagner, J., 1994. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research:An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79:67–76.
4. Douglas, T., 1983. Groups:Understanding people gathered together, London:Tavistock.
5. Gladstein, D. L., 1984. Groups in context:A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29:499–517.
6. Guzzo, RA., and Shea, G. P., Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology., 2nd ed. Edited by:Hough, M. D., and Dunnette, L. M., Vol. 3, pp.269–313. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologista Press.
7. Guzzo, RA., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., and Shea, G. P., 1993. Potency in groups:Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32:87–106.
8. Hackman, J. R., The design of work teams. Handbook of organizational behavior. Edited by:Lorsch, J. W., pp.315–342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
9. Hallam, G. L., and Campbell, D. P., Selecting team members? start with a theory of team efectiveness. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. May. Montreal, Quebec, Canada
10. Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., and Hogan, J., 1994. What we know about leadership:Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49:493–504.
11. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., and Wolf, G., 1993. Rwg:An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78:306–309.
12. Kline, T. J.B., 1999a. Remaking teams:The revolutionary research-based guide that puts theory into practice, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
13. Kline, T. J.B., 1999b. The Team Player Inventory (TPI):Reliability and validity of a measure of predisposition towards team working environments. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 24:102–112.
14. Kline, T. J.B., and MacLeod, M., 1997. Predicting organizational team performance. Organization Development Journal, 15:77–84.
15. Kline, T. J.B., and McGrath, J. L., 1998. Development and validation of five criteria for evaluating team performance. Organization Development Journal, 16:19–27.
16. Ledford, G. E., Lawler, E. E., and Mohrman, S. A., 1988. “The quality circle and ita variations.”. In Productivity in organizations, Edited by:Campbell, J. P., and Campbell, R. J., 255–294. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
17. Morgan, G., 1997. Zmaginization:New mindsets for seeing, organizing and managing, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
18. Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H., 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed., New York:McGraw-Hill.
19. Pedhazur, E. J., 1982. Multiple regression in behavioral research:Explanation and prediction, 2nd ed., Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20. Podsakoff, P. M., and Organ, D. W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research:Problem and prospects. Journal of Management, 12:531–544.
21. Shea, G. P., and Guzzo, R. A., 1987a. Group effectiveness:What really matters?. Sloan Management Review, 28:25–31.
22. Shea, G. P., and Guzzo, R. A., 1987b. “Groups as human resources.”. In Research in personnel and human resources management, Edited by:Ferris, K. M., and Rowland, G. R., Vol. 5, 323–356. Greenwich, CT:JAI.
23. Spector, P. E., 1994. Using self-report questionnaires in OB research:A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15:385–392.
24. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., and Futrell, D., 1990. Work teams:Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45:120–133.
25. Watson, W., Michaehen, L. K., and Sharp, W., 1991. Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76:803–809.
26. Weldon, E., and Weingart, L. R., 1993. Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32:307–334.
27. Williama, L., and Brown, B., 1994. Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research:Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57:185–209.
28. Zander, A. W., and Medow, H., 1963. Individual and group levels of aspiration. Human Relations, 16:89–105.
29. Zander, A. W., and Newcomb, T., 1967. Group levels of aspiration in United Fund campaigns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9:157–162.