The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees' work attitudes and well-being

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 237-240

  Epitropaki, Olga ^b   Martin, Robin ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033448987     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317999166635     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Basu, R. & Green, S. G. (1995). Subordinate performance, leader-subordinate compatibility, and exchange quality in leader-member dyads: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 77-92.
2. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Cook, J. & Wall, T. D. (1980). New work attitudes measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
5. Dienesch, R. M. & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634.
6. Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quaterly, 6, 219-247.
7. Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E. & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influence on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203-214.
8. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J. & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
9. McClane, W. E. (1991). The interaction of leader and member characteristics in the leader-member exchange (LMX) model of leadership. Small Group Research, 22, 283-300.
10. Smith, W. J. & Harrington, K. V. (1994). Younger supervisor-older subordinate dyads: A relationship of cooperation or resistance? Psychological Reports, 74, 803-812.
11. Tsui, A. S. & O'Reily, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
12. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D. & O'Reily, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
13. Turban, D. B. & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
14. Vecchio, R. P. (1993). The impact of differences in subordinate and supervisor age on attitudes and performance. Psychology and Ageing, 8, 112-119.
15. Warr, P. B. (1996). Employee well-being. In P. B. Warr (Ed.), Psychology at work, pp. 224-253. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
16. Warr, P. B., Cook, J. & Wall, T. D. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129-148.
17. Weiss, H. M. (1977). Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: the role of modelling in organizational socialization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 89-105.