For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 427-443

  Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944466061     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00315.x     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353-366.
2. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
3. Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Banks, J. A. (1998). The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multi-cultural society. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 4-17.
5. Bigelow, M., & Tarone, E. (2004). The role of literacy level in second language acquisition: Doesn't who we study determine what we know? TESOL Quarterly. 38, 689-700.
6. Blake, R. J., & Zyzik, E. C. (2003). Who's helping whom? Learner/heritage speakers' networked discussions in Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 24, 519-544.
7. Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33, 1-17.
8. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in SLA. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9. Breen, M. P. (2001). Postcript: New directions for research on learner contributions. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 172-182). New York: Pearson/Longman.
10. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 29-47.
11. Burbules, N. C. (2004). Ways of thinking about educational quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4-10.
12. Byrnes, H. (Ed.). (2005). Perspectives: The No Child Left Behind Act and teaching and learning languages in U.S. schools. Modern Language Journal, 89, 248-282.
13. Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2004). Dangerous discourses II [Special issue]. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2).
14. Casanave, C. P. (2003). Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called "post-process"?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 85-102.
15. Chapelle, C. (2005). Graduate-level research methods textbooks: Options and issues. Modern Language Journal, 89, 482-488.
16. Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism: Postructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Cherryholmes, C. H. (1999). Reading pragmatism. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Chinen, K., Donato, R., Igarashi, K., & Tucker, G. R. (2003). Looking across time: Documenting middle school Japanese FLES students' attitudes, literacy and oral proficiency. Learning Languages, 8(2), 4-10.
19. Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 9-26.
21. Cook, V. (Ed.). (2002). Portraits of the L2 user. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
22. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170.
23. Corson, D. (1997). Critical realism: An emancipatory philosophy for applied linguistics? Applied Linguistics, 18, 166-188.
24. Crookes, G. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: A socioeducational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 93-116.
25. Crookes, G. (2005). Resources for incorporating action research as critique into applied linguistics graduate education. Modern Language Journal, 89, 467-475.
26. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 367-380.
28. Donato, R., Antonek, J. L., & Tucker, G. R. (1996). Monitoring and assessing a Japanese FLES program: Ambiance and achievement. Language Learning, 46, 497-528.
29. Dörnyei, Z., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2001). Motivation and second language acquisition (Tech. Rep. No. 23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
30. Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's "i + 1": Incommensurable constructs, incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-442.
31. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: An educational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 69-92.
33. Ferguson, C. A. (1998). Long-term commitments and lucky events. In E. F. K. Koerner (Ed.), First person singular III: Autobiographies of North American scholars in the language sciences (pp. 39-57). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
34. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.
36. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417.
37. Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their after-math: A "historical" sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
38. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (Rev. ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. González, N. (2004). Disciplining the discipline: Anthropology and the pursuit of quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 17-25.
40. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Rev. ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
41. Greene, J. C., & Caracelli V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New directions for evaluation, No. 74 (pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Gregg, K. R., Long, M. H., Jordan, G., & Beretta, A. (1997). Rationality and its discontents in SLA. Applied Linguistics, 18, 538-558.
43. Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3-15.
44. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published in 1981)
45. Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329-350.
46. Hatch, E. (1978). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 123-143.
47. Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
48. Higgins, C. (2003). "Ownership" of English in the outer circle: An alternative to the NS-NNS dichotomy. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 615-644.
49. Holliday, A. (2004). Issues of validity in progressive paradigms of qualitative research. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 731-734.
50. House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
52. Howe, K. R., & Moses, M. (1999). Ethics in educational research. Review of Research in Education, 24, 21-60.
53. Hudson, R. (2004). Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, 40, 105-130.
54. Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2001). Age and L2 learning: The hazards of matching practical "implications" with theoretical "facts": Comments on Stefka H. Marinova-Todd, D. Bradford Marshall, and Catherine Snow's "Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning." TESOL Quarterly. 35, 151-170.
55. Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second, language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
56. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Johnson, K. E. (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 765-771.
58. Johnson, M. (2004). A philosophy of second language acquisition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
60. Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Kachru, B. B. (1992). Models for non-native Englishes. In B. B. Kachru (Ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed., pp. 48-74). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
62. Kamil, M. L. (1995). Critical issues: Some alternatives to paradigm wars in literacy research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 243-261.
63. Kindler, A. L. (2002). Survey of the states, limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 1999-2000 summary report. Washington, DC: The George Washington University and National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.
64. Kinginger, C. (2001). i + 1 ≠ ZPD. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 417-425.
65. Knight Abowitz, K. (2000). A pragmatist revisioning of resistance theory. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 877-907.
66. Kondo-Brown, K. (2001). Heritage language students of Japanese in traditional foreign language classes: A preliminary empirical study. Japanese Language and Literature, 35, 157-180.
67. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 84, 311-326.
68. Kunnan, A. (Ed.). (2000). Fairness and validation in language assessment: Selected papers from the 19th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Orlando, Florida. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Lantolf, J. (1996). SLA theory building: "Letting all the flowers bloom!" Language Learning, 46, 713-749.
70. Lantolf, J., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity Theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). London: Longman.
71. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). CA for SLA? It all depends. Modern Language Journal, 88, 603-607.
72. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
73. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175-181.
75. Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (1997). The idealised native speaker, reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 543-560.
76. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2004). Dangerous discourses I [Special issue]. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1).
77. Lindemann, S. (2002). Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States. Language in Society, 31, 419-441.
78. Long, M. H. (1993). Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories. Applied Linguistics, 14, 225-249.
79. López, J., & Potter, G. (Eds.). (2001). After postmodernism: An introduction to critical realism. New York: Athlone.
80. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
81. Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 9-34.
82. Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Missing the point: A response to Hyltenstam and Abrahamsson. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 171-176.
83. Markee, N. (1997). Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers' professional cultures? Modern Language Journal, 81, 80-93.
84. Markee, N. (Ed.). (2004). Classroom talks [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 88(4).
85. Martin, J. R. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 116-126.
86. Matsuda, P. K., Canagarajah, A. S., Harklau, L., Hyland, K., & Warschauer, M. (2003). Changing currents in second language writing research: A colloquium. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 151-179.
87. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33 (1), 3-11.
88. McNamara, T. F. (2003). Tearing us apart again: The paradigm wars and the search for validity. EUROSLA Yearbook, 3, 229-238.
89. Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.
90. Miele, F. (1995). Interview with Robert Sternberg on The bell curve [Electronic version]. Skeptic, 3(3), 72-80.
91. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323-347.
92. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
93. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
94. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
95. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717-761). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
96. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589-613.
97. Ortega, L. (1999). Language and equality: Ideological and structural constraints in foreign language education in the U.S. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives in language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 243-266). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
98. Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77-109). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
99. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-576.
100. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re) construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-177). New York: Oxford University Press.
101. Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253-269.
102. Pennycook, A.(Ed.). (1999). Critical approaches to TESOL [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3).
103. Pennycook, A. (2004). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784-807). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
104. Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
105. Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 429-452.
106. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Rajagopalan, K. (2004). The philosophy of applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 397-420). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
108. Rampton, B. (1999). Dichotomies, difference, and ritual in second language learning and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 20, 316-340.
109. Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 196-213.
110. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin Books.
111. Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54, 525-582.
112. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
113. Schutz, A. (2004). Rethinking domination and resistance: Challenging postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 15-23.
114. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
115. Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133-158.
116. Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209-239.
117. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
118. Sharwood Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. New York: Longman.
119. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Longman.
120. Shohamy, E. (2004). Reflections on research guidelines, categories, and responsibility. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 728-731.
121. Siegel, J. (2003). Social context. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 178-223). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
122. Silva, T., & Leki, I. (2004). Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing studies - Past, present, and future. Modern Language Journal, 88, 1-13.
123. Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2000). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds. ), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-896). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
124. Spada, N. (2005). Conditions and challenges in developing school-based SLA research programs. Modern Language Journal, 89, 328-338.
125. Spolsky, B. (1990). Introduction to a colloquium: The scope and form of a theory of second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 609-616.
126. Sridhar, S. N. (1994). A reality check for SLA theories. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 800-805.
127. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). A call for an end to the paradigm wars in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 221-231.
128. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an "expert student"? Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5-9.
129. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
130. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
131. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation in the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 486-506.
132. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
133. Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal, 89, 393-409.
134. Tucker, G. R. (2000). Concluding thoughts: Applied linguistics at the juncture of millennia. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 241-249.
135. U.S. Institute of International Education. (2003). Open Doors 2003. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.opendoors.iienetworki.org
136. Valdés, G. (2005). Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized? Modern Language Journal, 89, 410-426.
137. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Vidich, A. J., & Lyman, S. M. (2000). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In N. K. Benzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 37-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
139. Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Modern Language Journal, 88, 331-350.
140. Whiteside, A. (2004, May). Documenting the undocumented: Some challenges of research in immigrant communities. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
141. Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Discourses of enquiry and conditions of relevance. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990. Linguistics, language teaching, and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice, and research (pp. 37-48). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
142. Yates, L. (2005). Introducing new researchers to qualitative research: Some current options for textbooks. Modern Language Journal, 89, 475-482.
143. Zuengler, J., & Cole, K. M. (2004, May). Problematizing and pluralizing "sociocultural theory." Colloquium convened at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference, Portland, OR.