Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 329-348

  Pennycook, Alastair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944435445     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587668     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). From critical research practice to critical research reporting. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 321-331.
3. Christie, F. (1996). The role of a functional grammar in development of a critical literacy. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (pp. 47-57). Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.
4. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: Falmer Press.
5. Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault's methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.
6. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
7. Fairclough, N. (Ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness. London: Longman.
8. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
10. Gee, J. P. (1994). Orality and literacy: From the savage mind to ways with words. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice (pp. 168-192). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
11. Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
12. Jewell, J. (1998). A transgendered ESL learner in relation to her class textbooks, heterosexist hegemony and change. Melbourne Papers in Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-21.
13. Lee, A. (1997). Questioning the critical: Linguistics, literacy and curriculum. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 409-432). St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
14. Luke, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Ed.), Literacy in society (pp. 308-338). London: Longman.
15. Misson, R. (1996). What's in it for me? Teaching against homophobic discourse. In L. Laskey & C. Beavis (Eds.), Schooling and sexualities: Teaching for a positive sexuality (pp. 117-129). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University, Deakin Centre for Education and Change.
16. Morgan, B. (1998). The ESL classroom: Teaching, critical practice, and community development. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
17. Pennycook, A. (1997a). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 35-53). London: Longman.
18. Pennycook, A. (1997b). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253-269.
19. Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
20. Rizvi, F. (1993). Children and the grammar of popular racism. In C. McCarthy & W. Crichlow (Eds.), Race, identity, and representation in education (pp. 126-139). New York: Routledge.
21. Schenke, A. (1996). Not just a "social issue": Teaching feminist in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 155-159.
22. Spivak, G. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.
23. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.