Issues of validity in progressive paradigms of qualitative research

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 731-734

  Holliday, Adrian ^a  

^a CANTERBURY CHRIST CHURCH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944454476     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588292     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
5. Holliday, A. R. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage
6. Miller, S. M., Nelson, M. W., & Moore, M. T. (1998). Caught in the paradigm gap: Qualitative researchers' lived experience and the politics of epistemology. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 337-416.