Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called "post-process"?)

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 85-102

  Pearson Casanave, Christine ^a,b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Case study; L2 writing scholarship; Post process; Sociopolitical perspective; Writing research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038712645     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00002-X     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Anfara V.A. Jr. Brown J.M. Mangione T.L. Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public Educational Researcher 31 (7) 2002 28-38
2. Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. R. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing. 85th yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education (pp. 95-113). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Atkinson D. TESOL and culture TESOL Quarterly 33 1999 625-654
4. Bazerman, C. (1994a). Constructing experience. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1994b). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
6. Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Becker, H. S. (1990). Generalizing from case studies. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 233-242). New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Belcher, D., & Connor, U. (Eds.) (2001). Reflections on multiliterate lives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
9. Benesch S. ESL, ideology, and the politics of pragmatism TESOL Quarterly 27 (4) 1993 705-717
10. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communities: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Blakeslee A.M. Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ Journal of Business and Technical Communication 112 1997 125-169
13. Bloch, J. (2001). Plagiarism and the ESL student: From printed to electronic texts. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 209-228). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14. Buranen, L. (1999). "But I wasn't cheating": Plagiarism and cross-cultural mythology. In L. Buranen & A. M. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world (pp. 63-74). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Buranen, L., & Roy, A. M. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.
16. Canagarajah A.S. Comments on Ann Raimes's "Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing": Up the garden path: Second language writing approaches, local knowledge, and pluralism TESOL Quarterly 272 1993 301-306
17. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Canagarajah, S. (2001). Addressing issues of power and difference in ESL academic writing. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 117-131). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In G. Braine & D. Belcher (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Casanave C.P. Transitions: The balancing act of bilingual academics Journal of Second Language Writing 7 1998 175-203
21. Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacies in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Casanave, C. P., & Vandrick, S. (Eds.) (in press). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Clark, R., & Ivanič, R. (1997). The politics of writing. London: Routledge.
24. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Connor, U. (in press). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly.
26. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: The Falmer Press.
27. Davis K.A. Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research TESOL Quarterly 29 (3) 1995 427-453
28. Denzin, N. K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 313-344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175-199). New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (Eds.). (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Erickson F. Gutierrez K. Culture, rigor, and science in educational research Educational Researcher 31 (8) 2002 21-24
32. Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
34. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. Feuer M.J. Towne L. Shavelson R.J. Scientific culture and educational research Educational Researcher 31 (8) 2002 4-14
36. Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (F. Bradley and T. Trenn, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Flowerdew J. Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar TESOL Quarterly 34 2000 127-150
38. Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 43-66). London: Taylor & Francis.
39. Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Brighton: Falmer Press.
40. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
41. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. London: Longman.
42. Gilbert G.N. The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge Social Studies of Science 6 1976 281-306
43. Gosden H. Verbal reports of Japanese novices' research writing practices in English Journal of Second Language Writing 5 1996 109-128
44. Hairston M. The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing College Composition and Communication 33 1982 76-88
45. Hall, J. K., & Eggington, W. G. (Eds.). (2000). The sociopolitics of English language teaching. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
46. Hamp-Lyons, L. (Ed.). (1991). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Fourth generation writing assessment. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing. (pp. 117-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Hirvela A. Belcher D. Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers Journal of Second Language Writing 10 2001 83-106
49. Horowitz D. Process not product: Less than meets the eye TESOL Quarterly 20 1986 141-144
50. Hyland K. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles Applied Linguistics 17 1996 433-454
51. Hyland K. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse Journal of Pragmatics 30 1998 437-455
52. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
53. Hyon S. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL TESOL Quarterly 30 1996 693-722
54. Ivanič R. I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing Linguistics and Education 6 1994 3-15
55. Ivanič R. Writer identity Prospect 10 1995 8-31
56. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
57. Ivanič R. Camps D. I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing Journal of Second Language Writing 10 2001 3-33
58. Ivanič, R., & Simpson, J. (1992). Who's who in academic writing? In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 141-173). London: Longman.
59. Johns A.M. Interpreting an English competency exam: The frustrations of an ESL science student Written Communication 8 1991 379-401
60. Johns, A. M. (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructed and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
62. Kress, G. (1993). Genre as social process. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 22-37). London: The Falmer Press.
63. Kubota R. Ideologies of English in Japan World Englishes 17 1998 295-306
64. Kubota R. Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT TESOL Quarterly 33 1999 9-35
65. Kubota R. Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms TESOL Quarterly 35 (1) 2001 9-38
66. Kubota, R. (in press). Striving for original voice in publication: A critical reflection. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.). Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Leki, I. (1999). "Pretty much I screwed up": Ill-served needs of a permanent resident. In L. Harklau, K. Losey, & M. Siegal (Eds.), Generation 1.5 meets college composition (pp. 17-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Leki, I. (2001). Hearing voices: L2 students' experiences in L2 writing courses. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 17-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. McCarthy, L. P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 358-378). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
73. McCarthy L.P. Gerring J. Revising psychiatry's charter document DSM IV Written Communication 11 1994 147-192
74. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Mehan, H. (1993). Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 241-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Miller S.M. Nelson M.W. Moore M.T. Caught in the paradigm gap: Qualitative researchers' lived experience and the politics of epistemology American Educational Research Journal 35 (3) 1998 377-416
77. Mlynarczyk, R. W. (1998). Conversations of the mind: The uses of journal writing for second-language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Myers G. The social construction of two biologists' proposals Written Communication 2 1985 219-245
79. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
80. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
81. Pennycook A. Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism TESOL Quarterly 30 1996 201-230
82. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Prior, P. A. (2002). Disciplinarity: From discourse communities to dispersed laminated activity. Paper presented at the 2nd International Knowledge & Discourse Conference, Hong Kong.
84. Ravotas D. Berkenkotter C. Voices in the text: The uses of reported speech in a psychotherapist's notes and initial assessment Text 18 1998 211-239
85. Rosaldo, R. (1987). Where objectivity lies: The rhetoric of anthropology. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 87-110). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
86. Rosaldo, R. (1989/1993). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
87. Santos T. Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL Journal of Second Language Writing 1 1992 1-15
88. Santos, T. (2001). The place of politics in second language writing. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 173-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
89. Slavin R.E. Evidence-based education policies: Transforming education practice and research Educational Researcher 31 (7) 2002 15-21
90. Spack R. The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study Written Communication 14 1997 3-62
91. Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
92. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
93. Sternglass, M. S. (1997). Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
95. Swales, J. M. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Tierney W.G. Get real: Representing reality International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (4) 2002a 385-398
97. Tierney W.G. Writing matters International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (4) 2002b 427-430
98. Trimbur J. Taking the social turn: Teaching writing post-process College Composition and Communication 43 1994 108-118
99. Villanueva, V. (1993). Bootstraps: From an American of color. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
100. White, E. M., Lutz, W. D., & Kamusikiri, S. (Eds.). (1996). Assessment of writing: Politics, policies and practices. New York: Modern Language Association.
101. Zamel V. Writing: The process of discovering meaning TESOL Quarterly 10 1982 67-76